350 oiling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 27th, 2019, 12:05 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
redbaron442455's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Whittier California
Posts: 89
350 oiling

hello olds gurus,

I am helping my father get his 70 cutlass convertible going again (350 4bl) and due to my busy work schedule and my fathers impatience, he took his 350 to a local engine re-builder that his car buddies recommended, I made him a laundry list of things to do to the engine, two of them being open up the oil drain holes in the heads and use oil restricted push rods along with a high volume oil pump, so i got the call the motor is back home, and i was told the original push rods were "fine" and they couldn't open up the drain holes because its "too close to water" but they did put in the high volume pump.

what do you think my chances are of the oil pan getting sucked dry? should I put a standard oil pump instead of the high volume?
it has the stock oil pan, mild cam, #6 heads with big block valves, 9.5 CR and will be entirely street driven but im sure he will like to show off more often then necessary haha

any input is appreciated,




redbaron442455 is offline  
Old January 27th, 2019, 12:47 PM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,300
First, how will the car be used? If this is anything other than a drag car, the stock oiling system is fine. Olds built tens of millions of these 350 motors. They did not have a massive oiling failure problem.
Second, you will NEVER suck the oil pan dry. That is yet another urban myth about Oldsmobiles that won't die. (Hint, the motors in Supremes aren't offset, either).
Third, find a shop that has a clue. Smoothing and opening the drainback holes is both common and a smart thing to do. They are not "too close to water", the shop just didn't want to do the work. Same with the pushrods, though again, with a stock or nearly stock motor, this probably isn't a big concern.
Fourth, don't believe everything you read on the web. Most people have no clue about Olds motors.

Good luck with the car. With the motor that far apart, I hope you replaced the stock timing set with the nylon cam gear.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 27th, 2019, 02:18 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
redbaron442455's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Whittier California
Posts: 89
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
First, how will the car be used? If this is anything other than a drag car, the stock oiling system is fine. Olds built tens of millions of these 350 motors. They did not have a massive oiling failure problem.
Second, you will NEVER suck the oil pan dry. That is yet another urban myth about Oldsmobiles that won't die. (Hint, the motors in Supremes aren't offset, either).
Third, find a shop that has a clue. Smoothing and opening the drainback holes is both common and a smart thing to do. They are not "too close to water", the shop just didn't want to do the work. Same with the pushrods, though again, with a stock or nearly stock motor, this probably isn't a big concern.
Fourth, don't believe everything you read on the web. Most people have no clue about Olds motors.

Good luck with the car. With the motor that far apart, I hope you replaced the stock timing set with the nylon cam gear.
thank you for your input,
please correct me if I am wrong but my understanding was the stock oiling system is fine, but when you put a high volume pump your pushing more oil thru the system, and the oil drains in the heads cant drain fast enough, so that's why the drains should be opened up and or restrict oil to the rockers with restricted push rods, doing this prevents the valve covers from filling up with oil, which I have seen happen, mostly in boats, but something i would correct anyway. Also other advantages would be to reduce the drop in oil pressure at hot idle, allows larger bearing clearances, and the use of a lighter weight oil that's all that seems to be on the auto parts shelf nowadays,

the car will not be raced, mostly cruised around to car shows, occasionally burn rubber to show off, just wanting to build a solid long lasting motor.
redbaron442455 is offline  
Old January 27th, 2019, 04:22 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by redbaron442455
thank you for your input, please correct me if I am wrong but my understanding was the stock oiling system is fine, but when you put a high volume pump your pushing more oil thru the system, and the oil drains in the heads cant drain fast enough, so that's why the drains should be opened up and or restrict oil to the rockers with restricted push rods, doing this prevents the valve covers from filling up with oil, which I have seen happen, mostly in boats, but something i would correct anyway. Also other advantages would be to reduce the drop in oil pressure at hot idle, allows larger bearing clearances, and the use of a lighter weight oil that's all that seems to be on the auto parts shelf nowadays,

the car will not be raced, mostly cruised around to car shows, occasionally burn rubber to show off, just wanting to build a solid long lasting motor.
1. The thing that would be nice would be replacing the nylon cam gear, assuming that hasn't been done.
2. Your Dad's buddies may know a good rebuilder.
3. The high volume oil pump probably won't scavenge the oil pan completely dry.
3. Your Dad is just driving the car with a motor that has survived "kids", and its NOT a boat.
..........Just my two cents worth


OLDSter Ralph is offline  
Old January 27th, 2019, 04:23 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,827
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Third, find a shop that has a clue. Smoothing and opening the drainback holes is both common and a smart thing to do. They are not "too close to water", the shop just didn't want to do the work. Same with the pushrods, though again, with a stock or nearly stock motor, this probably isn't a big concern.
Fourth, don't believe everything you read on the web. Most people have no clue about Olds motors.
X2. Bearing clearances should be built around .001 per 1.00” of journal diameter. Then go from there.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 27th, 2019, 07:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by redbaron442455
when you put a high volume pump your pushing more oil thru the system
This is another very big misconception that I hate seeing. That is only true if the High Volume pump is also a higher pressure pump. You can only pump a certain amount of oil (or any other liquid) through a hole at a certain pressure. If the oil pressure is the same then a high volume pump will not pump a drop more oil through the engine if all of the clearances etc are the same. It is pressure that pushes the oil through the engine, not volume.

Like Joe said, Oldsmobile built millions of these engines and they ran just fine for many many miles. No need to reinvent the wheel.
BillK is offline  
Old January 27th, 2019, 11:02 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Inline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Chicago suburbs, Finland
Posts: 1,882
I chose bigger oilpan just for the sake of having more oil to dilute between changes, and in theory keeping it better between those.
Inline is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 01:32 AM
  #8  
Hookers under Hood
 
76olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,543
I agree with inline, get a bigger oil pan for piece of mind if you feel the need and do oil changes before the viscosity gets too high.

Eric
76olds is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 08:40 AM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,300
And again, for a nearly stock engine, a larger pan is yet another unnecessary expense. Literally TENS OF MILLIONS of Olds 350s were made, and they lived just fine with the stock pan. If you are worried about the oil between changes, you are not changing the oil often enough. Hey, but at least the larger pan will reduce ground clearance and force you to pay for a mini starter. Geeze, this is a nearly stock 350. Don't make unnecessary "improvements" that inflict collateral damage.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 10:15 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Inline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Chicago suburbs, Finland
Posts: 1,882
Yes, those wonderful V8's from dinosaur age maybe lasted 100k before total rebuild, same time Europeans made twice the miles. What a great design and victory of craftmanship. They aint so great that they cant be improved. Weird thing that same age european 2 liters had same oil volume than these big V8's. Weird..
Inline is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 10:38 AM
  #11  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,300
Originally Posted by Inline
Yes, those wonderful V8's from dinosaur age maybe lasted 100k before total rebuild, same time Europeans made twice the miles. What a great design and victory of craftmanship. They aint so great that they cant be improved. Weird thing that same age european 2 liters had same oil volume than these big V8's. Weird..
Wow, seriously? Five quarts appears to be the "standard" for most displacements, whether a four cylinder or a V8. Frankly, most newer engines have gone to LESS oil in the pan, primarily to reduce windage losses in the name of efficiency. I'll note that an old racer's trick is to use a 6 qt pan and only put five quarts in it for exactly this reason. I'm not aware of a lot of 1960s vintage Euro motors that go 200K miles without major work. On the other hand, the cast iron pushrod 454 in my Chevy truck has 285K miles on it with no engine work whatsoever. I only replaced the timing chain at 150K as a preventative measure. The rest of the engine is untouched.

And again, I'll restate what you've conveniently missed from my prior posts. For the OP's car that is a near stock 350 in a lightly used Cutlass, there is no need to make these mods. The risk of collateral damage by throwing together unmatched parts is far greater than the potential benefit. Nowhere does it say that the engines can't be improved. What it says is that 1) for the OP's intended use, mods are an unnecessary expense, and 2) mods need to be carefully selected and matched to the application and to each other to achieve benefits. The questions being asked are of the "I read on the interwebs..." type.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 06:14 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by Inline
Yes, those wonderful V8's from dinosaur age maybe lasted 100k before total rebuild
I just did the 307 out of my Wifes Riviera last year. It had 220K miles on it and if the plastic timing gear had not given up it would still be running. The bearings and crankshaft looked good enough to put right back in the way they were if I had wanted to. The cylinder bores had less than .001" wear on them. I bored it anyway because I could Switched it over to a hydraulic roller and I expect it will outlive me. The "old" school engines lasted every bit as long as some of the new ones if they were cared for. No they were not as efficient or small but they would last.
BillK is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 06:55 PM
  #13  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
I ran a 350 with a totally "stock" oiling system and big block pan spun it past 6300 rpm regularly at the track and usually drove well above 3300 RPM. Car ran 12.20's and it was heavily abused before it got sold and went on to live life in another drag car.

Last edited by coppercutlass; January 28th, 2019 at 06:58 PM.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 28th, 2019, 11:15 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
redbaron442455's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Whittier California
Posts: 89
Sorry for the misunderstanding, my question was will I run into problems because the motor was built mostly stock WITH a high volume oil pump, I am concerned that I will run into problems because it has a high volume pump and not the other modifications to accommodate it.
redbaron442455 is offline  
Old January 29th, 2019, 06:17 AM
  #15  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,300
Originally Posted by redbaron442455
Sorry for the misunderstanding, my question was will I run into problems because the motor was built mostly stock WITH a high volume oil pump, I am concerned that I will run into problems because it has a high volume pump and not the other modifications to accommodate it.
You have nothing to be concerned about. Run the motor. You'll be fine.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old February 6th, 2019, 12:04 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
JohnnyBs68S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,195
So, just so I understand, is the only advantage of a "high-volume" oil pump that it will better maintain oil pressure after XXX,000 miles (or when idling) as the bearing clearances increase due to wear compare to a "standard volume" oil pump?
JohnnyBs68S is offline  
Old February 6th, 2019, 01:17 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Inline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Chicago suburbs, Finland
Posts: 1,882
In short and crude, normal vs high-volume oil pumps difference, given same set oil pressure, is that high-volume simply delivers more oil per revolution of pump-gears. In theory, it reaches set-pressure faster, like in idle it have slight advantage on idling oil-pressure. Reality might not be so different. And if your engine gets really worn, or has really loose clearances, it will keep it on set pressure farther than normal pump due to added volume per revolution of oil-pump. Plus slight parasitic pumping loss vs normal volume pump, again due to added volume you just pump through by-pass back to oilpan.

I dont take any part for suggesting for either one.


Last edited by Inline; February 6th, 2019 at 01:19 PM.
Inline is offline  
Old February 9th, 2019, 08:59 AM
  #18  
elB
Registered User
 
elB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: E TN
Posts: 18
The only time I've ever had actual experience with these engines "sucking the pan dry" is on a circle track race car that goes round and round at 3000-4000RPMs constantly as the pickup can get uncovered if the pan isn't baffled and runs low on oil. Unless your engine is built for this purpose, there's no real reason to use the high voltage oil pump or worry about it and it's one of those hot rodder rumors that hasn't gone away. Personally I'd be more worried that the engine has oil starvation issues from lack of regular checking of the oil level...
elB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deadeyejedi
Big Blocks
11
March 14th, 2018 06:08 PM
David DeCan
Big Blocks
24
January 15th, 2016 07:05 PM
Brian F
Big Blocks
35
May 31st, 2009 08:35 PM
442 Guatemala
Big Blocks
25
May 10th, 2009 05:04 PM
bennymac
Big Blocks
26
April 27th, 2007 04:51 AM



Quick Reply: 350 oiling



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:58 PM.