350 or 455

Old September 3rd, 2007, 10:38 PM
  #1  
Red69CutlassS
Thread Starter
 
Gert3116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Billings
Posts: 47
350 or 455

I have 69 Cutlass S that came with an olds 350 and I am planning on either rebuilding that engine or finding a 455 and rebuilding that. Can you get decent power out of the 350 without spending 2 or 3 thousand on parts. Also I can't find a repair manual like a Chiltons for my car. Can anyone give me a few suggestions?
Gert3116 is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2007, 11:42 PM
  #2  
Tom Servo's Stunt Double
 
texasred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 889
It costs almost as much to go through a 350 as a 455. If you can get your hands on a non-smogger (pre 73) for fairly cheap, go for it. TH400 (stock with 455s) transmission uses a shorter driveshaft. You can keep your TH350 transmission and driveshaft, if you have the transmission built up.

Forget Chiltons. Get a Chassis Service Manual, Fisher Body Manual and Assembly Manual. Available as reprints from Year One, or go ebay. Best money I spent on my car!

C.J.
texasred is offline  
Old September 4th, 2007, 08:10 PM
  #3  
Red69CutlassS
Thread Starter
 
Gert3116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Billings
Posts: 47
But can you make a 350 fairly hot or is it not worth it to put that much money into it.
Gert3116 is offline  
Old September 8th, 2007, 05:59 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
$tryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belle River Ontario
Posts: 46
Short answer, yes. But, nothing beats cubic inches!!!!!!!


Bigger is better!
$tryker is offline  
Old September 8th, 2007, 06:05 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,862
If he goes to a 455 will he have to consider modifying the front suspension? I would think that a 455 would outweigh a 350 by enough that worn springs might sag with the added weight. Anybody ever have this problem?
Olds64 is offline  
Old September 8th, 2007, 06:23 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
$tryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belle River Ontario
Posts: 46
With a worn out suspension, that may be a possibility. I pulled the original 330 from my drop top, and replaced it with the BBO, utilizing an 8 quart pan and had no problems. All that was required was a front end alignment. Good thought.
$tryker is offline  
Old September 10th, 2007, 07:54 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Redog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,145
Originally Posted by Olds64
If he goes to a 455 will he have to consider modifying the front suspension? I would think that a 455 would outweigh a 350 by enough that worn springs might sag with the added weight. Anybody ever have this problem?
This is why I put the 350 in My Delta instead of the 455, replacing the old 307
Redog is offline  
Old September 28th, 2007, 05:22 PM
  #8  
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,468
I think they should weigh about the same. Especially if you put on new aluminum deelybobbers.

The problem is usually always with exhaust clearances.
J-(Chicago) is offline  
Old September 29th, 2007, 05:56 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Redog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,145
But at $1500 top $1800 a pop, that's up to you, if you have that kind of money to spend.

I've read that my 350 weighed in at 560 lbs from the factory and the 307 was about 420 lbs. Since I swapped manifolds I dropped 38 lbs off that 560 down to a slimmer 522 lbs.

The car weighed in at 3990 to 4010 with the 307, and 4050 to 4070 with the 350, pending on how much gas was in the tank
Redog is offline  
Old September 29th, 2007, 08:52 AM
  #10  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by Olds64
If he goes to a 455 will he have to consider modifying the front suspension? I would think that a 455 would outweigh a 350 by enough that worn springs might sag with the added weight. Anybody ever have this problem?
In stock condition, the weigh difference is less than 100 lbs. Sit on the front fender and that's how much difference it will make.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 29th, 2007, 11:33 AM
  #11  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,862
Sit on the front fender and that's how much difference it will make.
I think if I sit on the front fender it would make a bit of a difference. I weigh in at nearly 300lbs.
Olds64 is offline  
Old September 29th, 2007, 01:53 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
64Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Union City Calif.94587
Posts: 2,383
BBO or SBO, it depends on what you plan to do with the car. With gas now days BBO is not great on gas. But if you hop up the SBO, mileage will not matter. You have the small block now, do it. Big block OLDS, lots of power.

Geno..
64Rocket is offline  
Old September 29th, 2007, 07:05 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
shaks 442 clone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hayward, california
Posts: 235
Originally Posted by 64Rocket
BBO or SBO, it depends on what you plan to do with the car. With gas now days BBO is not great on gas. But if you hop up the SBO, mileage will not matter. You have the small block now, do it. Big block OLDS, lots of power.

Geno..
and what setup are you running geno?

and im talking from front bumper to taillights
shaks 442 clone is offline  
Old September 30th, 2007, 06:36 AM
  #14  
Past Administrator
 
Oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Posts: 10,008
Originally Posted by Olds64
I think if I sit on the front fender it would make a bit of a difference. I weigh in at nearly 300lbs.
He is not fat, just tall........
I'm fat
Oldsguy is offline  
Old September 30th, 2007, 08:50 AM
  #15  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,862
BBO or SBO, it depends on what you plan to do with the car. With gas now days BBO is not great on gas. But if you hop up the SBO, mileage will not matter. You have the small block now, do it. Big block OLDS, lots of power.
I wouldn't worry about gas mileage. Like 64 Rocket said if you have an Olds 350 you might as well rebuild that. If you put mild performance parts in it to make a strong street motor you will get respectable milelage for a muscle car as long as you keep your foot out of it. Any of these cars we drive get poor gas mileage compared to the cars of today. Actually, the gas mileage of today's cars is poor as well but that is another story...
Olds64 is offline  
Old October 1st, 2007, 04:00 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
yogi442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Blaine Wa
Posts: 81
350 weighs in at 560lbs, 455 comes in at 640lbs stock weight. I did not changes to front end of my 76 Cutlass when converting nor to my 66 442 when installed 455.
yogi442 is offline  
Old October 1st, 2007, 07:49 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
GoldOlds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chatham-Kent, Ontario
Posts: 117
80 pounds, that's it?!? Damn, I bet they'd weigh the same (more or less) if you put alumn. heads on the SBO.
From what I've heard, the 350 SBO is a motor with good potential without having to go wild with cam lift/dur, compression, etc. Some might even say it responds as well to mods as a 350 Chevy . . . others would say that's crazy. didn't one of the hot rod mags do a GM 350 shootout (Chev vs. Pontiac vs. Olds vs. Buick or something like that)? If so, I'd LOVE to read that article...

- GoldOlds
GoldOlds is offline  
Old October 2nd, 2007, 05:52 PM
  #18  
dar83501
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
One of the hot rod mags did a Buick-Pontiac-Oldsmobile 455 shootout, but I don't know what the results are. I know they started with an olds motor, but I don't know if it's gotten any farther than that or not. Not that it matters, cause we all know the olds motor would win.

Personally, I'd rather go big block 455 than sb350. But that's because I have a 455 project going on.

No Replacement For Displacement brother!

Oh yeah, and edit:

My philosophy is, if you're gonna build a muscle car, you'd better not care about gas mileage. It's a muscle car. If you can afford to build a muscle car, you better count on affording the gas it needs too. They're not designed to be economical, they're designed to be fun! Who says you can't have too much of a good thing?

Last edited by dar83501; October 2nd, 2007 at 05:56 PM.
 
Old October 2nd, 2007, 11:30 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
yogi442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Blaine Wa
Posts: 81
my 76 Cutlass came stock with 350. We did a mild build 60 over with Edelbrock intake and 260 comp cam and it performed great. But there is still no excuse for cubic inches and finally built a 455 for it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
006_3.jpg (80.9 KB, 10 views)
yogi442 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gearheads78
Parts For Sale
6
February 29th, 2012 08:11 PM
dharlett
Parts For Sale
0
September 23rd, 2009 03:30 PM
Jokers69
Parts Wanted
1
October 5th, 2006 03:00 AM
<Eddie>
Big Blocks
2
November 1st, 2005 07:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 350 or 455



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 PM.