1970 Cutlass Supreme Headers
#1
1970 Cutlass Supreme Headers
I have read many posting regarding headers for a 1970 cutlass supreme convertible. I have been working on my olds for the post year and finally beginning to reassemble – pic’s to come. This weekend I installed the motor and a set of hooker headers. Both the website and the technical line for hooker said they would not fit but as posted - wrong. The header went on without a problem. It took less than thirty minutes without the need for a big hammer, cutting or modifying.
Thanks to those who have posted in the past. Without your input I would have passed on the install.
Thanks to those who have posted in the past. Without your input I would have passed on the install.
#2
Can you get me the specifics as to what header those are? I am looking for some for my 71 cutlass supreme. I am having a hard time finding any. Also are they a full length header? I have a set of hedmans on there now that hang to low and it needs to be fixed, so i'm looking for a nice high and tight set up. If i need to get a new starter to do so I will. Do you have a high torque low pro starter or not? Thanks for any help you can give me. Scott
#3
Scott, any headers that will fit the Cutlass S or 442 models will fit the Supreme. There have been several threads discussing the bad information out there including from the dealers who sell them. I've had a couple different brands and they all seem to hang down lower than the crossmember. John
#5
Happy for you. I just dropped my rebuilt 350 in my 70 convertible. My new Flowtech coated headers slid right into place, but the motor mount rubber is contacting. I have the motor mounts out now and will be grinding rubber this evening.
Last edited by Bayou Olds; February 8th, 2011 at 12:55 PM.
#7
Headers
I used Flowtech 31150FLT headers. I got them through Summit Racing. I think I paid $275-$279. They are $285 right now.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-img-9203.html
The link is a picture of the headers before I ground the rubber and tightened.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-img-9203.html
The link is a picture of the headers before I ground the rubber and tightened.
Last edited by Bayou Olds; February 14th, 2011 at 06:18 PM. Reason: to add link
#14
One more time: There is NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER in the frame, trans, engine or location of a Cutlass Supreme and the same year Cutlass. The only difference is the rear roofline, and if that causes a problem for your header installation, you're doing something wrong. Summit is clueless. Assuming your car has the original TH350, that trans is EXACTLY the same width as every other TH350 ever made.
Might the problem be the backdrive linkage, and not the actual transmission?
Feel free to post photos of your "too wide" transmission. Others here will post photos of their Cutlass Supremes with headers installed.
#15
The only thing I see on the application notes is that these headers will not fit auto trans with column shift. This would be due to interference with the backdrive linkage as Joe mentioned above, but even that doesn't make much sense to me as the floor shift cars have the backdrive linkage for the ignition lock feature. As for as I know, the backdrive linkage is the same between floor shift and column shift cars, but I have never owned a column shift cat so I am just going by what I have read on the net.
Last edited by Fun71; March 29th, 2015 at 01:00 PM.
#16
The only thing I see on the application notes is that these headers will not fit auto trans with column shift. This would be due to interference with the backdrive linkage as Joe mentioned above, but even that doesn't make much sense to me as the floor shift cars have the backdrive linkage for the ignition lock feature. As for as I know, the backdrive linkage is the same between floor shift and column shift cars, but I have never owned a column shift cat so I am just going by what I have read on the net.
The frame is the same
The body in this area is the same
the engine and trans are the same
There is NO reason that anything that fits a Cutlass or 442 will not fit a Cutlass Supreme.
It is the second greatest Olds Myth right after the Solid Main Web 403.
Kill it.
#17
Chris, I agree with you. My point was how can it fit a floor shift car but not fit a column shift car if both cars have the same backdrive linkage?
Anyway, I have a set of Heddman headers on my car and they do not interfere with the backdrive linkage.
Anyway, I have a set of Heddman headers on my car and they do not interfere with the backdrive linkage.
#18
Speaking from past experience hooker 3901hkr headers for a small block fit with no modification to anything. The only thing I can say about them is the drivers side might be tight at the lower control arm area. The 3902hkr for big blocks require the shift linkage rod to be flipped and a little bend/ twist to be put in it. This is on 70-72 a body.
#19
And as Chris noted, the backdrive linkage can be bent to clear. It just isn't a complete bolt-in operation. Header manufacturers don't know the skill of the installer and tend to err on the side of conservatism. Of course, as noted above, SOME manufacturers can actually route the pipes to clear anyway. Go figure.
#20
Yeah, but if you look at the different years for application, the notes make no sense. At least on the Summit site. There is no difference between the 31150FLT and the 11150FLT headers other than the coating. Yet the applications are different and conflicting.
#21
Headers
I installed a set of stainless headers on my 72 Supreme with auto floor shift, they are Pro Comp part# PC5035. It was a very frustrating job I had to try 3 different brand mini starters because of fit issues and the passenger side hangs really low so I have to be extra careful when pulling in anywhere. If I have to do it again I'll buy those W & X repro 350 manifolds.
#22
I installed a set of stainless headers on my 72 Supreme with auto floor shift, they are Pro Comp part# PC5035. It was a very frustrating job I had to try 3 different brand mini starters because of fit issues and the passenger side hangs really low so I have to be extra careful when pulling in anywhere. If I have to do it again I'll buy those W & X repro 350 manifolds.
And just so we're all on the same page, ALL full length headers hang lower than stock manifolds. It's not possible to get equal length tubes any other way. Either one is willing to put up with the compromises to get the performance, or one should stick to stock manifolds. And I would suggest closely comparing aftermarket SBO manifolds to stock before plunking down $300. Your money, your choice.
#23
You're right Joe when we talk about headers we should just put Cutlass because there is no difference, I think it is the way they advertise them when you do a search. I read somewhere the factory used a block off plate on the cross over to run dual exhaust? I just can't wait to start cruising.
#24
#25
Flowtech are a poor header. I had ceramic peel and rust pin holes everywhere after a year. They were A body headers in a 1/2 ton. Hedman and Sanderson make Shorty headers for those years.
#26
Flow tech headers fit just fine on my 70 cutlass convertible. They are a little close to the shifter cable but nothing to get in a twist about. Also have ample clearance around the back drive linkage too.
#27
Obviously you people don't have a clue
Before you make disparaging remarks look at the posts. I have been running the same Flotech headers for about 4 years with ZERO issues, that is other than tightening header bolts, but that is expected. I think your issue is address in a response above "requires more effort to work around", than you or your "mechanic" brother in law wants to put in. I have not posted here in a while, but this place can be a wealth of knowledge for those who want to listen. BTW that is a Cutlass Supreme I drive that appears in my profile pic. Again ZERO issues for 4 years..............
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TOONLOVESCHERYL
Chassis/Body/Frame
1
April 7th, 2011 10:38 AM