Bigs and littles wheel tire combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 24th, 2015, 06:10 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
Bigs and littles wheel tire combo

So, I've always liked the bigs/littles (drag car) look for wheels and tires. I have the fronts figured out (15X4 wheels with Mickey Thompson radial front runners). I have a stock height (not lowered) '69 442 with the stock rear end (not narrowed). What do you think I can fit for the largest wheel/tire combo in the rear? I'm pretty sure 15X8 wheels and a 275/60-15 combo will fit easily. Is anyone running bigger in a stock setup? Include wheel offset/backspacing if you can. Photos would be good too.

Thanks
Joel C
huskerala is offline  
Old March 24th, 2015, 06:38 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
1970Olds442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 25
I’m running 15 x 8 Cragar S/S (4.5” backspace) in the front, I like smaller tires up front, but not quite as small as you want to run, with 215 60 15’s.

On the rear, thanks to advice from Brian Trick, I have 15 x 10 Cragar S/S with 5.5” backspacing and run 325 50 15’s.These fit with no modifications to the trunk or body.I did have to make some changes to the exhaust I was running, but the exhaust on the car when I got it was pretty crappy and needs to be replaced anyhow.

Hope this helps.

Ray
1970Olds442 is offline  
Old March 24th, 2015, 07:19 PM
  #3  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
15x8 with a 275/60/15 in the rear and 15x5 with a 26 in. tall m/t sportman front runners. I lowered my car about 2 inches in the front.





Last edited by coppercutlass; March 24th, 2015 at 07:23 PM.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old March 25th, 2015, 07:01 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Using 70 and up cars as examples is comparing apples to oranges. The 68-69 cars have different quarters and won't take as much tire. A 275/60 on a 15x8 with 4.5" backspace fits on a 68-69 without issues. I know a guy who is running the 295/55 on a 15x8 as well.
chadman is offline  
Old March 25th, 2015, 07:42 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
More

Originally Posted by chadman
Using 70 and up cars as examples is comparing apples to oranges. The 68-69 cars have different quarters and won't take as much tire. A 275/60 on a 15x8 with 4.5" backspace fits on a 68-69 without issues. I know a guy who is running the 295/55 on a 15x8 as well.
Just make sure to have the 4.5" BS. I had 275 60 15s on 15 x 8" rims with 4.25" BS on my gold 69 442 and cut a sidewall while turning and passing from a street into a parking lot. The extra BS proved to be imperative.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old March 25th, 2015, 02:59 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
70olds455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 211
I am running 275 60 on 15x8 weld draglites. I also have a set of cragar 15x10 deep dish rims with drag radials which still fits with no issues.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
PA220150.jpg (78.0 KB, 91 views)
70olds455 is offline  
Old March 25th, 2015, 03:02 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Fyi

Originally Posted by 70olds455
I am running 275 60 on 15x8 weld draglites. I also have a set of cragar 15x10 deep dish rims with drag radials which still fits with no issues.
Fit of wheels and tires on a 1970 is not applicable to the 68/69 models.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old March 26th, 2015, 06:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
Backspacing issues

Thanks for the advice guys. I was just on Cragar's website and the issue I see is that they're only listing the 15X8's with 4 1/4 backspacing....no 4 1/2's

You're certain the 4 1/4's won't work???
V/R
huskerala is offline  
Old May 18th, 2015, 03:08 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cpcbuckshot442@aol.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: new jersey
Posts: 15
rear tires

I have a71 442 with 15 by 8 rims 4.5 back space and have 295-65-15 they fit
cpcbuckshot442@aol.com is offline  
Old May 18th, 2015, 05:42 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
yes but....

Originally Posted by cpcbuckshot442@aol.com
I have a71 442 with 15 by 8 rims 4.5 back space and have 295-65-15 they fit

Please see above. The fit of rims & tires on 70-72 is NOT applicable to the 68-69 body style.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2015, 12:43 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
A lot of time the rear was not 100% centered from side to side so measure first.
Like others have said 68/69 differ from other years
What fits 64-65 66-67 68-69 70-72 [ 70-72 cutlass supreme or convert quarter panel differs this may also effect tire size for these years ] 73- As the body style changes so does tire fitment.

Last edited by Bernhard; June 3rd, 2015 at 12:47 AM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2015, 01:04 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by huskerala
Thanks for the advice guys. I was just on Cragar's website and the issue I see is that they're only listing the 15X8's with 4 1/4 backspacing....no 4 1/2's

You're certain the 4 1/4's won't work???
V/R
ms


Cragar will make custom back spacing on some of there billet wheels
Cragar ss direct fit billet original wheel for example.
Bernhard is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2015, 07:46 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Rallye469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,877
A lot of time the rear was not 100% centered from side to side so measure first.
^This.
I needed to at a .25" spacer on one side to fit the 15X10 with 5.5" of BS on mine.
Although I'm pretty sure my car was clocked on the passenger quarter at one point.

That said, I'm pretty sure '69's don't have as much room as the '70's do.
I doubt you'd fit the 325's without some modifications.

-Pete
Rallye469 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 01:09 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
Went with Cragars

15x6" in the front, 205/75-15's
15x8" in the rear with 4.25 BS, 275/60-15's

Photos won't load!
huskerala is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 01:28 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Fyi

Originally Posted by huskerala
15x6" in the front, 205/75-15's
15x8" in the rear with 4.25 BS, 275/60-15's

Photos won't load!

Just wait and see. Mine bolted on & looked fine too. Be very careful going over anything but smooth roads. Good Luck. Hope you don't come back & say You told me so when you cut the sidewall like I did with that same combo on my 69 442.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 01:54 PM
  #16  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
I had 205's but they are too big and wide . Had mickey thompson sportmans 26.00 x 7.00 great tire but sucked on the stree. Now I have 160 85 15's and they are skinny and ride great and even with the car lowered in the front almost 2 inches the slightly smaller diameter. Of the radials didn't cause any clearance issues and I have a steep driveway .
coppercutlass is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 02:10 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
I had 205's but they are too big and wide . Had mickey thompson sportmans 26.00 x 7.00 great tire but sucked on the stree. Now I have 160 85 15's and they are skinny and ride great and even with the car lowered in the front almost 2 inches the slightly smaller diameter. Of the radials didn't cause any clearance issues and I have a steep driveway .
You can't compare your car to his.His car is different when it comes to tire fitment. The 68/69 are not like 70,71,72.JMO
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 03:17 PM
  #18  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
I was talking about the fronts and ground clearance .
coppercutlass is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 03:29 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
I was talking about the fronts and ground clearance .
Well a shorter tire doesn't give ground clearance with front end lowered 2 inches.So i guess you lost me there.On a side note why would you lower your ride height? If your car was a custom hotrod/streetrod i could see it but most just look dumb when it is a 70/72 cutlass.Now if you're going for the rake look i might understand. Maybe dumb isn't the right way to say it.More like it doesn't look right for the type of car.JMO

Last edited by wr1970; July 16th, 2015 at 03:48 PM.
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 03:46 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Pics to help

This is what my 69 442 looked like with the 225 70 15s up front & 275 60 15s out back. Rear rims are 15 x 8" with 4.25" BS. 1st time out with the car on this set up is when the driver's rear cut the sidewall. I replaced the cut tire & moved the rims to my 1970 W-31 & never had a problem on that car because of the more generous wheel wells on the 70-72 model.


A stock height 68/69 A body with stock rear differential is a tight fit for anything bigger than 255 60 15s. I learned the hard way.


DSCN1298_zpsba61a43f.jpg















Last edited by oldsmobiledave; July 16th, 2015 at 03:50 PM.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 04:22 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Oldsmobiledave nice pictures and cool cars. That exhaust pipe is close to your tire in the picture anyways it appears like it.Looks like it needed to move a little.Is that a factory type fitment or custom? Thanks for sharing the pictures.
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 04:53 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Fyi

Originally Posted by wr1970
Oldsmobiledave nice pictures and cool cars. That exhaust pipe is close to your tire in the picture anyways it appears like it.Looks like it needed to move a little.Is that a factory type fitment or custom? Thanks for sharing the pictures.


Just the angle of the pic. There was lots of room. Exhaust was on the car when I purchased it.


Sold this car 15 months ago & miss it dearly.


Here is what it looked like with the repo 83-84 HO rims & 235 60 15s up front & 255 60 15s out back (how it was when I bought it & when I sold it).





oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 06:44 PM
  #23  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
well wr1970 im confused . i drag race the car so lowering the front and removing any unsprung weight is very basic race car stuff to get better traction through weight transfer . Any who here is a pic . Wr1970 this whole thread is called bigs and littles by hot rod definitions this is the look.





coppercutlass is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 06:55 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
well wr1970 im confused . i drag race the car so lowering the front and removing any unsprung weight is very basic race car stuff to get better traction through weight transfer . Any who here is a pic . Wr1970 this whole thread is called bigs and littles by hot rod definitions this is the look.





I am not going to argue the point of the lower the car front is basic race car stuff.I will say that weight transfer of unsprung weight helps.I also know springs the expand quicker with 90/10 shocks help more than most know.I also have been drag racing.Go check out my junk in my album.Oh and my street car/race car is fast enough.I am on the reference full throttle list twice with two different cars.I wasn't trying to doubt what you were doing just asking why.If i stepped on your toes that wasn't my intention.
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 07:35 PM
  #25  
Beer Connoisseur
 
70cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Daly City, California
Posts: 2,090
Originally Posted by wr1970
Well a shorter tire doesn't give ground clearance with front end lowered 2 inches.So i guess you lost me there.On a side note why would you lower your ride height? If your car was a custom hotrod/streetrod i could see it but most just look dumb when it is a 70/72 cutlass.Now if you're going for the rake look i might understand. Maybe dumb isn't the right way to say it.More like it doesn't look right for the type of car.JMO
Dang, I guess this is not the right look after all.

70cutty is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 07:41 PM
  #26  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
wr1970 i have the trick springs and the 90/10's all the tricks i guess . The whole the front of the car being lower in the front helping hook was explained to me years ago by an old olds racer. Everyone has their prefrence . I didnt take offense in anyway .
coppercutlass is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 08:06 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by 70cutty
Dang, I guess this is not the right look after all.

No offence but the stance that oldsmobile dave has on both those cars pictures is what i am talking about they look good. Not to say your car doesn't look good and i never said your car didn't look good. My preference is hotrod streetrod rake look.Regular street car none race is more what the pictures dave showed. My album shows streetrod look as well as rake on two of my toys.
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 08:21 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
wr1970 i have the trick springs and the 90/10's all the tricks i guess . The whole the front of the car being lower in the front helping hook was explained to me years ago by an old olds racer. Everyone has their prefrence . I didnt take offense in anyway .
Trying not to hijack this thread but i was told to take off sway bar on the front and to tell you the truth i think it is bs.I did do it but the car in my opinion is no faster and i see no difference in weight transfer. I am thinking about putting it back on.My 1967 has the sway bar on and it hooks real good.The 67 doesn't have trick springs like the 1970 442 does.It just has the 90/10 3 way adjustables like the 1970. the 70 has rear sway bar the 67 doesn't.I'm just saying different cars react differently and set up depends on hp of the combo. Soon i will run the seventy in drive down the track looking for mid elevens.It is tagged a street legal and drove on the street and well as drove to the track. Best time was 12.50 with a 461ci now has a 468.Cheers
wr1970 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2015, 10:45 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
RocketKid70's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Southwest Michigan
Posts: 59
I think they ALL look good!
RocketKid70 is offline  
Old August 19th, 2015, 06:58 PM
  #30  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
huskerala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC but originally from Nebraska
Posts: 59
After a few weeks of running my 4.25 BS 15x8's and 275/60-15's, I haven't had any fit issues. I do have the option of putting more air in the rear shocks but I'm running them at 25 psi. I'm not a big fan of air shocks but they were on the car when I bought it. I was also able to ID what rearend is in the car and it is an original Old 8.5" "12 bolt", non-W27.
huskerala is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jensenracing77
General Discussion
11
February 21st, 2015 04:34 PM
odddoylerules
Small Blocks
34
April 21st, 2014 07:54 AM
Kid64
Wheels and Tires
11
December 14th, 2012 05:03 PM
pops1958
Wheels and Tires
0
September 4th, 2011 08:36 PM
montvaleplace
General Questions
1
March 5th, 2011 06:48 AM



Quick Reply: Bigs and littles wheel tire combo



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 AM.