Valve to Throat Ratio - Edelbrock Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 19th, 2014, 05:30 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DJackson1357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Valve to Throat Ratio - Edelbrock Heads

Greetings all, this is my first post on these forums after lurking here for a while.

I'm currently going through a set of Edelbrock heads that I purchased about a year ago. The previous owner looks like they started to port around the pushrod area, but the work doesn't look very good. I was going to smooth out / clean up that area, then do some work in the bowl area and call them good.

Does anyone have a good recommendation for the valve to throat ratio on the Edelbrocks? I've seen numbers of 92% posted in the ProComp porting thread from February, 89.5% from an old Mondello article, 90% as the general rule, and I think 88-89% was mentioned in the cast iron head porting thread. Is there much difference between 90% and 92%? Should the exhaust throat % be smaller than intake?

Following the clean up the heads will get a good valve job and probably back cut intake valves.

The heads will be going on the 455 in my dad's 85 Delta 88. The rest of the engine is unknown pistons (180 PSI cranking compression), generic 214/224 camshaft, Edelbrock Performer intake, repop W/Z manifolds and a full 2.5" exhaust with X pipe. The rest of the combo will stay the same with the Edelbrock heads.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
DJackson1357 is offline  
Old October 19th, 2014, 05:40 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Welcome!!!
90% is about right but there are others here that can confirm that one way or another.
But I will tell you that the guys that do all my headwork, Champion Race heads, tell me that the stock intake valve is too small to begin with. On all the Edelbrocks I've been using I have the intake valve size increased to 2.125 right off the bat. An otherwise stock Edelbrock head with the 2.125 intake flows 271@.600. Not bad for no work.

Any reason for the generic cam? There are better inexpensive grinds out there for your build. And you'd be better served to put more lift in it. Otherwise those heads will be wasted imo.

Thanks!

Last edited by cutlassefi; October 19th, 2014 at 10:01 AM.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 19th, 2014, 07:29 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
The 90% figure will work just fine. 90% is the general figure so you can use that for the exhaust valve ratio also.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old October 19th, 2014, 01:08 PM
  #4  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
On all the Edelbrocks I've been using I have the intake valve size increased to 2.125 right off the bat.
Mark,

That's great info. What size exhaust are you using with that intake? No problems with clearances with the stock valve centerlines? Thanks.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old October 19th, 2014, 02:33 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Hey joe,
No problems whatsoever. I'm using the supplied 1.68 exhaust.
The guys at Champion recommended that change right away. It helps flow all the way thru, from .100 to .650 lift. After that it plateaus. The stock port will only handle so much at that point.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 21st, 2014, 02:18 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
DJackson1357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Welcome!!!
90% is about right but there are others here that can confirm that one way or another.
But I will tell you that the guys that do all my headwork, Champion Race heads, tell me that the stock intake valve is too small to begin with. On all the Edelbrocks I've been using I have the intake valve size increased to 2.125 right off the bat. An otherwise stock Edelbrock head with the 2.125 intake flows 271@.600. Not bad for no work.

Any reason for the generic cam? There are better inexpensive grinds out there for your build. And you'd be better served to put more lift in it. Otherwise those heads will be wasted imo.

Thanks!
From what you and Joe mentioned I'll shoot for 90% on the intake and exhaust. I appreciate the input. The 2.125" valve sounds like a good deal, but not sure if I want to spend the extra money on the valves. Will have to think on that one.

The generic 214/224 came in the engine when I purchased it. Basically picked up a whole car to get a rebuilt 455 and TH-400. Then the TH-400 blew up. I swapped the engine into my dad's Delta and pretty much left everything as is minus pulling the heads to check everything.

The Edelbrocks are going on because I got a what I think is a good deal on them ($900 assembled with head bolts, pushrods, and rockers) and they might help a few issues I have. The C heads on there were cracked and repaired, the crossover isn't filled and I can't run any more than 32 degrees of total timing without pinging. I figure the Edelbrocks will fix all those issues in one shot.

PM sent regarding the camshaft.
DJackson1357 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RAMBOW
Parts For Sale
12
March 20th, 2017 06:58 PM
crank shaft
General Discussion
33
January 29th, 2014 03:20 PM
Hawk1061
Big Blocks
2
April 2nd, 2013 06:44 PM
f-85
Parts For Sale
5
March 29th, 2013 07:39 AM
rcdynamic88
Big Blocks
3
February 18th, 2010 07:46 AM



Quick Reply: Valve to Throat Ratio - Edelbrock Heads



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:46 PM.