J heads... dead horse!
November 17th, 2018, 07:49 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
J heads... dead horse!
Well I know it's kind of a dead issue to build or modify a set of J heads because of the low cost of more desirable castings, but I decided to find out for myself. I have a set of c, ga, and J castings at the shop. Visual inspection the J ports are very different. They are much smaller and they have a very high short side. I hope to answer many questions about the job heads. I have some good numbers but unfortunately it takes a bit of skilled porting to get there. I will post pics and numbers soon.
November 17th, 2018, 10:49 AM
#4
Out of Line, Everytime😉
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,909
They can flow great with porting but are horrible to start with, same goes for 4A or any later "#A" heads. Heads like 8's can be improved greatly on the exhaust side with a bowl hog, J heads and 4A heads need hours of port work, not an easy fix. It will interesting to see before and after numbers and include the time spent on them.
November 18th, 2018, 08:40 PM
#5
72 Cutlass Ponca City OK
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Ponca City, OK
Posts: 155
I just priced having the local NAPA do a basic valve job and surfacing on a set of heads, no porting, etc. $460 a set, plus any springs, parts, or guides. It makes aluminum heads start to look very tempting.
November 18th, 2018, 09:09 PM
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
They are overpriced in my opinion. Not to take away from your point. I charge 225.00 to do a " valve job "and mill up to .005.
Last edited by ChevyZ06; November 18th, 2018 at 09:10 PM. Reason: Spelling
November 18th, 2018, 09:50 PM
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
From what I can tell so far it looks like the J intake port is a copy or the small block olds head intake port. The port work that I have done is all in the bowl area with some guide boss reshaping. I will try to post the flow numbers from a set of C castings for reference soon.
November 19th, 2018, 06:54 AM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 762
Awesome improvements for just bowl porting and guide boss reshaping!
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
Last edited by Battenrunner; November 19th, 2018 at 07:03 AM.
November 19th, 2018, 09:59 AM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Braceville, Ohio
Posts: 1,972
In my opinion, the NAPA Shop is to high. There's a fine line in charging, too much and they go Aluminum heads, too less and you won't be able to keep the lights on. Around where I live, we had lots of machine shops, not anymore. My main shop I used, the owner that I've known from school (1956) passed away. One nearby shop is closing before the end of the year. 2 others have closed in the last 5 years. The two I still use aren't getting any younger, both mid 50s. Nobody rebuilds Chevrolet heads anymore and that was the shops bread and butter. If I had other cores (C, E, G) I'd choose one of those. Jmo.
November 19th, 2018, 10:59 AM
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
Awesome improvements for just bowl porting and guide boss reshaping!
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
November 19th, 2018, 11:05 AM
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
In my opinion, the NAPA Shop is to high. There's a fine line in charging, too much and they go Aluminum heads, too less and you won't be able to keep the lights on. Around where I live, we had lots of machine shops, not anymore. My main shop I used, the owner that I've known from school (1956) passed away. One nearby shop is closing before the end of the year. 2 others have closed in the last 5 years. The two I still use aren't getting any younger, both mid 50s. Nobody rebuilds Chevrolet heads anymore and that was the shops bread and butter. If I had other cores (C, E, G) I'd choose one of those. Jmo.
November 19th, 2018, 11:09 AM
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
Awesome improvements for just bowl porting and guide boss reshaping!
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
They picked up 32-36 cfm across the board from .400 lift and up
once you get the shortblock built, you should run the car on the chassis dyno and compare the stock and ported heads HP and torque numbers
November 19th, 2018, 03:42 PM
#18
Ben
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,824
Engine machine shops are a dying art. It makes me sad too. There are many reasons for the decline. I do have a set of Cs and a set of Ga heads at the shop. But I really wanted to explore the potential of the J heads, mostly because of the countless internet forum post with people asking about the J heads and getting the same answers.
about 18 years ago I had a set of J's worked over by a machine shop, all new guts & ported. About $800 worth- simply because I already had them and was too lazy to try and find better castings at the time. Put them on the stock 455 with plans to build a better bottom end eventually, but sold the car.
about 3 years later the car came up for sale again, I saw it and contemplated buying it back- spoke to the new owner (not the guy i sold it to) he said the 455 had spun a bearing and he had found and installed a 403 in a wrecking yard to replace it..
I asked what happened to the heads that had been on the 455 and he told me he junked em with the engine because they were J's... and everyone knows J is for junk.
Doh!
November 19th, 2018, 04:24 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 762
Well, the problem is the stigma surrounding the J heads.
You can port and rebuild sets of J heads and have them on sleepers or sell them to someone who doesn’t think J is for Junk.
The tough part is getting someone else to get past that Olds Rumor mill that the J’s aren’t good and getting paid a good price for them.
You will have to prove it with Dyno numbers comparing J’s to other heads.
I would like to see what you could do for power with a mild lift, long duration cam and these heads.
You can port and rebuild sets of J heads and have them on sleepers or sell them to someone who doesn’t think J is for Junk.
The tough part is getting someone else to get past that Olds Rumor mill that the J’s aren’t good and getting paid a good price for them.
You will have to prove it with Dyno numbers comparing J’s to other heads.
I would like to see what you could do for power with a mild lift, long duration cam and these heads.
November 19th, 2018, 04:39 PM
#21
'72 Cutlass ragtop
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 941
interesting read - I just this weekend picked up a complete '73 455 with J heads, appearing thus far unmolested. I'd be very interested to see how a properly modified set of J heads would perform against other more popular option factory heads but I guess I'm part of that hesitant group that wouldn't readily spend retail money to take a chance on them, based on everything I've read to date.
November 19th, 2018, 05:29 PM
#22
Out of Line, Everytime😉
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,909
What about the even worse side, the exhaust side? Now there is some serious grind time. My 4A and 5A heads were bloody awful even compared to 8 heads on the exhaust side. Aren't the 8 heads a better starting point and also have BBO sized chambers?
November 19th, 2018, 07:14 PM
#23
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
One thing to remember is that most NA engines only need around 65% to 75% intake to exhaust flow ratio. So with my math at 220 cfm intake we would need around 165 cfm max on the exhaust side. I haven't tested them yet but I think that shouldn't be a problem. I am not saying that the J heads are great and everyone should use them. I am simply trying to see if the J heads have any potential and what they might work well on. I port many different cylinder head castings. There is always a favorite but some times the favorite is not the best for the application. Think about Chevrolet Big Block. There are three intake ports to choose from. Peanut port, big oval, and rectangular port. If we used a cylinder head based on flow numbers alone than every Rat engine would have Rectangular ports on it. I don't want to get ahead of myself but I think that a nice ported set of J heads in some applications might out perform the C castings. Thats not a negative statement against C heads, just making the point for careful selection of parts . In a street engine, if you have a choice of two heads that flow close to the same numbers than the one with the smaller volume is the better performer. Now thats my opinion.
November 20th, 2018, 04:25 PM
#31
Out of Line, Everytime😉
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,909
Funny the intake stock was crappier than I thought and the exhaust is better stock than I thought, go figure. I didn't realize J heads had the stupid lip under the exhaust valve like #8 heads. They end up around what stock big valve castings flow, not bad.
Last edited by olds 307 and 403; November 20th, 2018 at 04:30 PM.
November 20th, 2018, 05:53 PM
#32
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
If I have time tonight I am going to flow test one of the stock C castings that I have to give us a good reference point. My bench is very stingy. 220 on my bench is 245 on others.
November 20th, 2018, 06:06 PM
#34
Registered User
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 762
Your bench is stingy!!!
I remember spending lots of time comparing what a similar head flows on your bench to what a magazine or other head porter showed. Your bench always made us work extra hard to get good numbers!!
As a side note, I know this guy personally and he is an awesome person, machinist, auto-tech teacher, and performance engine builder for all types of engines. He has just now come around to the dark side and decided to spend some time on Oldsmobile stuff.
I remember spending lots of time comparing what a similar head flows on your bench to what a magazine or other head porter showed. Your bench always made us work extra hard to get good numbers!!
As a side note, I know this guy personally and he is an awesome person, machinist, auto-tech teacher, and performance engine builder for all types of engines. He has just now come around to the dark side and decided to spend some time on Oldsmobile stuff.
November 20th, 2018, 06:56 PM
#35
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
Your bench is stingy!!!
I remember spending lots of time comparing what a similar head flows on your bench to what a magazine or other head porter showed. Your bench always made us work extra hard to get good numbers!!
As a side note, I know this guy personally and he is an awesome person, machinist, auto-tech teacher, and performance engine builder for all types of engines. He has just now come around to the dark side and decided to spend some time on Oldsmobile stuff.
I remember spending lots of time comparing what a similar head flows on your bench to what a magazine or other head porter showed. Your bench always made us work extra hard to get good numbers!!
As a side note, I know this guy personally and he is an awesome person, machinist, auto-tech teacher, and performance engine builder for all types of engines. He has just now come around to the dark side and decided to spend some time on Oldsmobile stuff.
November 20th, 2018, 08:57 PM
#36
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Tyler Texas
Posts: 86
Stock C heads with back-cut 2.00 valve 1.678 exhaust valve
.50 29 na
.100 66 59
.150 101 83
.200 133 105
.250 156 121
.300 171 131
.350 187 141
.400 199 150
.450 208 157
.500 215 161
.550 222 165
.50 29 na
.100 66 59
.150 101 83
.200 133 105
.250 156 121
.300 171 131
.350 187 141
.400 199 150
.450 208 157
.500 215 161
.550 222 165
November 21st, 2018, 06:17 AM
#39
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
This is a stock G head tested on a 4.155 bore @ 28 inches, small valve.
200/122 .300/172 .400/196 .500/209 .550/215 .600/220 .700/226.
200/122 .300/172 .400/196 .500/209 .550/215 .600/220 .700/226.
Last edited by VORTECPRO; November 21st, 2018 at 06:23 AM.
November 26th, 2018, 12:19 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Dead horse won't really be beat until we see a dyno shootout for who can build the most powerful J headed 455 with stock stroke 
. Maybe make it worth the time with a $500 - $1,000 buy in.
That would be entertainment.
. Maybe make it worth the time with a $500 - $1,000 buy in.That would be entertainment.
