Oldsmobile 350 engine, remanufactured long block, includes many extras -$1,000
#1
Oldsmobile 350 engine, remanufactured long block, includes many extras -$1,000
This is a complete oldsmobile 350 motor built by reputable Oldsmobile machine shop, cost me $1,500 just for the engine. I have all documentation and cam card. Stock rebuild with all new parts, valves have hardened valve seats for unleaded fuel. Inludes new oil pan, timing cover, 4 barrel intake manifold, electronic distributor, valve covers, oil pump, water pump, starter, and fuel pump. Everything you need to drop it in your car. I can also sell seperately pulleys and brackets for accessories. This motor has been sitting in a plastic bag since received so it is still new. I'm asking $1,000 for everything. I have well over $2,500 in the motor and parts.
Robert
(817)seven-one-eight-0220
Robert
(817)seven-one-eight-0220
#2
Some more information about the engine would help generate interest.
Heads?
compression rato
list any important machine work performed i.e. zero decked, align bore, etc.
Looks like a good price as you can't touch a complete rebuilt engine for that price point.
Good Luck Sir.
Heads?
compression rato
list any important machine work performed i.e. zero decked, align bore, etc.
Looks like a good price as you can't touch a complete rebuilt engine for that price point.
Good Luck Sir.
#4
As far as specs go, it's a stock rebuild. Every single spec will be what it was stock for a 68 model cutlass. It was done by S&S engine remanufacturing. I've got the paperwork from S&S. It's a Remanufactured engine part number 35041.
#7
Here is the link on their website. The info on here is all I know. This is the website I bought it from.
http://www.rebuiltautoengines.com/ol..._4-engine.html
http://www.rebuiltautoengines.com/ol..._4-engine.html
#9
Then it is not "... a stock rebuild. Every single spec will be what it was stock for a 68 model cutlass."
A '68 Cutlass would have #5 heads. #6 or #7 would be similar enough to be considered within the bounds of a "stock rebuild." #8 heads have a much larger combustion chamber, and no chance of obtaining the same compression, unless seriously decked.
Unless your builder specified that the heads, pistons, and block had been cc'd to the '68 spec., and described how, one could not conclude that this was a "stock" '68 rebuild.
- Eric
A '68 Cutlass would have #5 heads. #6 or #7 would be similar enough to be considered within the bounds of a "stock rebuild." #8 heads have a much larger combustion chamber, and no chance of obtaining the same compression, unless seriously decked.
Unless your builder specified that the heads, pistons, and block had been cc'd to the '68 spec., and described how, one could not conclude that this was a "stock" '68 rebuild.
- Eric
#10
I'm not trying to deceive anyone. The parts were chosen by S&S and the motor was put together by S&S. I ordered it off their website. It is supposed to be a stock reman motor. If you want every number or part to be a perfect match for your car, then this motor isn't for you. Rebuild your stock motor or source parts. This is an engine for a driver that needs a motor, or for someone on a tight budget. I'm including a ton of parts to complete the motor, all new. My loss, someone else gain. I'm selling because I sold my car and no longer need the motor.
#11
I'm not trying to say that you are. You may just not know the differences in specifications.
But the fact is that without specific information to the contrary, indicating machine work that is not usually done, the presence of #8 heads, which have very different combustion chamber volumes than #s 5, 6, and 7 have, means that this engine is NOT built to 1968 specifications, which called for either 9:1 or 10.25:1 compression ratio, depending on whether the engine was a 2bbl or a 4bbl (as I asked before).
This is not a question of "every number or part" being "a perfect match," but of whether the engine is, as you say, built to 1968 specifications, or whether it is built to other specifications. The answer to this question may be important to a potential buyer.
I'm trying to help you here, because if someone bought this engine expecting a 10.25:1 motor, and received an 8:1 motor, they might be a bit peeved.
- Eric
But the fact is that without specific information to the contrary, indicating machine work that is not usually done, the presence of #8 heads, which have very different combustion chamber volumes than #s 5, 6, and 7 have, means that this engine is NOT built to 1968 specifications, which called for either 9:1 or 10.25:1 compression ratio, depending on whether the engine was a 2bbl or a 4bbl (as I asked before).
This is not a question of "every number or part" being "a perfect match," but of whether the engine is, as you say, built to 1968 specifications, or whether it is built to other specifications. The answer to this question may be important to a potential buyer.
I'm trying to help you here, because if someone bought this engine expecting a 10.25:1 motor, and received an 8:1 motor, they might be a bit peeved.
- Eric
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
auto_editor
Vista Cruiser & Wagons
1
April 10th, 2011 09:21 AM
BerBer5985
Small Blocks
2
August 12th, 2009 10:29 AM