General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Pontiac V8 oddity - RH bank is fwd of LH bank

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6th, 2014, 10:02 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Pontiac V8 oddity - RH bank is fwd of LH bank

Weird that they would do that
I assume they number the cylinders the same as Olds- 1357 front to back LH side, and 2468 front to back RH side. If so, the the most fwd rod on the crank is the #2 rod, not #1, which just seems not right, to me.




Never you mind why I was looking at other brands.
Octania is offline  
Old May 6th, 2014, 12:13 PM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,265
Originally Posted by Octania
Weird that they would do that
I assume they number the cylinders the same as Olds- 1357 front to back LH side, and 2468 front to back RH side. If so, the the most fwd rod on the crank is the #2 rod, not #1, which just seems not right, to me.
I've never worked on a Poncho, so I never noticed that before, but I did know that Brand F has always had the passenger side bank forward of the driver's side and calls the front passenger side cylinder No. 1 (of course, Ford also calls the front driver's side cylinder No. 5, so go figure...).
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 6th, 2014, 12:40 PM
  #3  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
Ford had 2 different firing orders for later vs early v8's also. Talk about confusing.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 8th, 2014, 09:55 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Right...
Neither of those seem to me like the RIGHT way to do things.
First foremost rod and cylinder is #1, then #2... etc.

I just noticed Pontiac evidently put the distributor on the wrong side of the cam, like Chevy, such that the gear is forced upwards against the distributor body. The right way to do it is to push the gear DOWN against a boss in the engine block to carry the thrust load... like -oh- who did that? Yeah, OLDSMOBILE.
Octania is offline  
Old May 8th, 2014, 02:45 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Summerof84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 255
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Ford had 2 different firing orders for later vs early v8's also. Talk about confusing.
I got a good deal on an Econoline van due to a no start. Guess why?
Summerof84 is offline  
Old May 8th, 2014, 03:28 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
I learned the hard way back in the 80's after stripping all the pollution stuff, doing cam, intake, 4V carb and headers on my 82 Mustang. I used my old books not realizing they changed the firing order. After hours and hours of fighting backfiring, sputtering, and spitting a buddy showed me the error of my ways.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 8th, 2014, 03:35 PM
  #7  
Big Daddy No Bucks
 
ThePackRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 891
Yep .....

Low-po vs high output 302's in that era used a different firing order.
ThePackRat is offline  
Old May 10th, 2014, 04:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
isn't the firing order and cylinder numbering cast into the parts like Olds does?
Octania is offline  
Old May 10th, 2014, 07:35 PM
  #9  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
No, that would have been too easy.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 10th, 2014, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
brown7373's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, FL
Posts: 1,124
Every manufacturer does some things we question. Like why did Olds have the lower water pump bolts screw into little more than sheet metal? Many get stripped out and require removal of timing cover, lift engine off mounts and remove oil pan to remove the timing cover to repair. Yes, you can tap a slightly larger (metric) bolt into the stripped hole, but that is a really just a Band-Aid.
brown7373 is offline  
Old May 10th, 2014, 10:06 PM
  #11  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Starting to worry about ya Chris You've been dabbling in quite a bit of Poncho stuff lately Have you done relinquished, dismantled and deciphered any and all Oldsmobiles up there in your area and the well run dry on Oldses?
GAOldsman is offline  
Old May 10th, 2014, 10:26 PM
  #12  
Phantom Phixer
 
Charlie Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 4,661
If I remember right, nailvalve Buicks (53-66) also had the right hand bank foremost on the block. And the right front cylinder was numbered 1 and the rest on that bank were 3,5,&7.

Last edited by Charlie Jones; May 10th, 2014 at 10:29 PM.
Charlie Jones is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 09:41 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
mzbk2l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Superstition Mountain, AZ
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by Octania
Right...
Neither of those seem to me like the RIGHT way to do things.
First foremost rod and cylinder is #1, then #2... etc.

I just noticed Pontiac evidently put the distributor on the wrong side of the cam, like Chevy, such that the gear is forced upwards against the distributor body. The right way to do it is to push the gear DOWN against a boss in the engine block to carry the thrust load... like -oh- who did that? Yeah, OLDSMOBILE.
Of course, Pontiac had the "air gap intake" and adjustable valve trains when Olds was still baking oil to the bottom of the crossover and requiring serious mods to change valvetrain geometry. I guess if we took the best of everything from each division, we'd end up with... a modern LS-series engine?
mzbk2l is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 09:50 AM
  #14  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,265
Originally Posted by mzbk2l
Of course, Pontiac had the "air gap intake" and adjustable valve trains when Olds was still baking oil to the bottom of the crossover and requiring serious mods to change valvetrain geometry.
Really? Go look at a 1949 303 Olds V8 sometime...

That predates the Poncho V8 by a few years.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 12:15 PM
  #15  
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
s i 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Ford had 2 different firing orders for later vs early v8's also. Talk about confusing.
302 and 351 winsor has different firing order also, you can run the same cam but have to run the wires different.
s i 442 is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 12:21 PM
  #16  
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
rustyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Margate, England
Posts: 2,513
Simca (France), and Jaguar (UK) for reasons best known to themselves decided that #1 cylinder would be at the flywheel end, the main bearing caps were numbered back to front as well. I had a nightmare at work year ago when I had to reassemble a Simca engine someone else had stripped down. I couldn't figure why the engine wouldn't turn when I put the main bearing caps on, the bearings were the right size, the crankshaft had been ground properly. After half a day someone familiar with these engines showed me my error, or I might still be trying to fit the damn thing.......


Roger.
rustyroger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VikingBlue
General Discussion
8
October 15th, 2014 10:47 AM
Octania
Small Blocks
17
October 28th, 2013 02:01 PM
HARDLUCK88
Vista Cruiser & Wagons
26
March 10th, 2010 05:52 PM
Andrew240
Toronado
5
December 22nd, 2007 01:54 PM
1965T5
Cars For Sale
0
August 25th, 2006 01:39 PM



Quick Reply: Pontiac V8 oddity - RH bank is fwd of LH bank



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM.