Tricky question: Does front bench center arm rest have vinyl or fabric as pictured?
#1
Tricky question: Does front bench center arm rest have vinyl or fabric as pictured?
I'm pretty excited that my 1972 front bench seat is being redone in the next few days after the others are complete. I decided to put a front bench with center arm rest into my Vista Cruiser, but am using the cloth option that was offered (only in gold). I don't know if that option was ever available with a center arm rest, but if it wasn't, I was wondering if it would have been covered in vinyl or the same plain fabric that runs along the lower portion of the seat back. I have attached two pictures from Oldsmobile brochures, but it's not clear whether all surfaces on the arm rest were the same material and which material that was. One shows the arm rest up and the other with it down.
I have two ways of looking at it that make some sense to me. My upholsterer says that compared to the plain blue fabric, vinyl would wear better and not get dirty as easy from having a sweaty arm rest on it all the time. To me, it looks from both pictures like the material, at least on the horizontal (upper and lower) surface is the same fabric as on the lower part of the seat back. It also would make sense to me that that strip of cloth (fabric) running from one end of the lower seat back to the other end without being interrupted by one short of vinyl instead of one continuous piece of fabric.
Apparently, the sides of the seat backs and all surfaces of the headrests should be made of vinyl. It makes some sense that the sides of the center arm rest and possibly the top would be made with vinyl. I just can't get past that fabric strip getting broken up be vinyl on the bottom of the arm rest (which is part of the seat back when it's folded up)...
Does anybody know for sure how these bench seats were originally done, either because they had Olds cars with this similar seat and fabric design or because they have first hand knowledge? I can't say for sure, but I would think that full size Olds models and maybe two door Cutlass models came with such a front bench seat and upholstery design...
Finally, my upholsterer tells me that I really can't use the carpet that is normally found at the bottom of the back of the front bench seat back, as shown in my third picture because the folding bench seats lower seat frame is built a little differently than on a solid bench seat where the seat back comes all the way to the floor instead of only to the inside of the lower bench seat frame and that the carpet would be difficult to get round the edges of the lower frame and wouldn't hold up to the opening and closing of the seat back (which wouldn't really happen very often since it's going into a 4 door car (I'm mostly interested in the center arm rest feature instead of the folding seats.
Thanks!, Tom
Here are some pictures of my second and third row bench seats not installed yet in the back of my VC. I'm happy how they finally turned out after a lot of gentle coaxing with my very stubborn upholsterer (what does it matter if the front bench seat has 27 or 28 or 20 pleats?...)
I have two ways of looking at it that make some sense to me. My upholsterer says that compared to the plain blue fabric, vinyl would wear better and not get dirty as easy from having a sweaty arm rest on it all the time. To me, it looks from both pictures like the material, at least on the horizontal (upper and lower) surface is the same fabric as on the lower part of the seat back. It also would make sense to me that that strip of cloth (fabric) running from one end of the lower seat back to the other end without being interrupted by one short of vinyl instead of one continuous piece of fabric.
Apparently, the sides of the seat backs and all surfaces of the headrests should be made of vinyl. It makes some sense that the sides of the center arm rest and possibly the top would be made with vinyl. I just can't get past that fabric strip getting broken up be vinyl on the bottom of the arm rest (which is part of the seat back when it's folded up)...
Does anybody know for sure how these bench seats were originally done, either because they had Olds cars with this similar seat and fabric design or because they have first hand knowledge? I can't say for sure, but I would think that full size Olds models and maybe two door Cutlass models came with such a front bench seat and upholstery design...
Finally, my upholsterer tells me that I really can't use the carpet that is normally found at the bottom of the back of the front bench seat back, as shown in my third picture because the folding bench seats lower seat frame is built a little differently than on a solid bench seat where the seat back comes all the way to the floor instead of only to the inside of the lower bench seat frame and that the carpet would be difficult to get round the edges of the lower frame and wouldn't hold up to the opening and closing of the seat back (which wouldn't really happen very often since it's going into a 4 door car (I'm mostly interested in the center arm rest feature instead of the folding seats.
Thanks!, Tom
Here are some pictures of my second and third row bench seats not installed yet in the back of my VC. I'm happy how they finally turned out after a lot of gentle coaxing with my very stubborn upholsterer (what does it matter if the front bench seat has 27 or 28 or 20 pleats?...)
Last edited by tcolt; April 19th, 2019 at 09:09 AM.
#2
Boy, those seats look nice Tom. My 71 Supreme convertible had all vinyl on the seat and arm rest, which wouldn't look right with your completed seats. The Vista I had I put a seat out of a 72 Cutlass Supreme in it. It had been reupholstered before I got it with a cloth type material but not like the original type your seats have.The seat had what appeared to be original vinyl arm rest but it had a hole in it. ( the whole seat only cost $10. at a swap meet) Anyway the wife made a vinyl cover for it. It was good enough for that car. I'll try to find a pic of it. Looks like you are making good progress on your Vista! Greg. Sorry can't find pics.
#3
Thanks Greg. I'm not sure whether I understood right that your 71 came with all vinyl seats in the first place so that the center arm rest would have also been all vinyl?... And it sounds like the '72 also had a vinyl arm rest? Just checking :-)... I'm a little **** about trying to make choices that the factory might have made or offered in their various different models. Tom
#4
My 70 Cutlass Supreme convertible bench seat has cloth material on the bottom and back side. Everything else is vinyl. Its a good thing that its cloth because when the top is down on a hot sunny day, I dont have to burn my *** sitting on a hot vinyl seat.
#6
Thanks Koda
Just to be sure. In your experience the center arm rests were always all vinyl on all sides, even if that nice fabric strip along the bottom doesn't look quite as nice because it is interrupted? I wonder why Oldsmobile did that when the rest of the seat is covered in cloth? Can you tell from the pictures that we are looking at vinyl and not cloth? To my eyes it looks almost the opposite..
I'm not clear on your seat Ely. Did you mean the "bottom and back side" of your seat are cloth or of the arm rest? You obviously are not sitting on the vinyl center arm rest. What about leaning your back against it or putting your arm on it on a hot day? I'm just trying to make sure I understand correctly and I want to do it as Oldsmobile would have done it even if it doesn't make sense.
Thank, Tom
Just to be sure. In your experience the center arm rests were always all vinyl on all sides, even if that nice fabric strip along the bottom doesn't look quite as nice because it is interrupted? I wonder why Oldsmobile did that when the rest of the seat is covered in cloth? Can you tell from the pictures that we are looking at vinyl and not cloth? To my eyes it looks almost the opposite..
I'm not clear on your seat Ely. Did you mean the "bottom and back side" of your seat are cloth or of the arm rest? You obviously are not sitting on the vinyl center arm rest. What about leaning your back against it or putting your arm on it on a hot day? I'm just trying to make sure I understand correctly and I want to do it as Oldsmobile would have done it even if it doesn't make sense.
Thank, Tom
#7
I look at the seat,from right to left and left to right, you have fabric...vinyl gap...fabric...vinyl gap (armrest when up) then fabric..vinyl gap and fabric. just looks symetricly right to me. and the back is probably all vinyl showing
#8
I'm not saying that it isn't vinyl, since the pictures aren't that great, but I was just hoping that Koda or someone could confirm that the arm rests only came in all vinyl. Top, sides and bottom. It's very possible that vinyl is the only correct answer and I'm also very interested in your view and understanding what sequence you are referring too, since I obviously couldn't follow it. (You started out with fabric on both ends, so you must not be counting the sides, but I lost where the long fabric band cross the complete seat backs switches over to vinyl except where the arm rest starts?... I'm not counting the vinyl piping) I agree that the back of the seat back would be vinyl, except that the standard bench seat would have had a band of carpet along the bottom 10 inches or so to reflect the carpeting on the door panels. I'd like to use that same idea on my "modified" bench seat, even though the back of the seat bottom is seen from that view instead of just the seat back...
Thanks, Tom
#11
There are some conflicting opinions here. Here's my answer - both. With the armrest folded up, the face would be cloth to match the plain cloth of the seat backs. This cloth will face down when the armrest is folded.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
If you look at the pictures you posted, the top-when-up/front-when-down area has seam where the cloth and vinyl meet.
I had a '67 98 with a brocade and vinyl interior. The face of the armrest was brocade, matching the seat back inserts. When folded, the part you rest your arm on was vinyl to match the seat bolsters. Your car should be the same.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
If you look at the pictures you posted, the top-when-up/front-when-down area has seam where the cloth and vinyl meet.
I had a '67 98 with a brocade and vinyl interior. The face of the armrest was brocade, matching the seat back inserts. When folded, the part you rest your arm on was vinyl to match the seat bolsters. Your car should be the same.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
Last edited by Oldsfan; April 18th, 2019 at 05:59 PM.
#12
There are some conflicting opinions here. Here's my answer - both. With the armrest folded up, the face would be cloth to match the plain cloth of the seat backs. This cloth will face down when the armrest is folded.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
If you look at the pictures you posted, the top-when-up/front-when-down area has seam where the cloth and vinyl meet.
I had a '67 98 with a brocade and vinyl interior. The face of the armrest was brocade, matching the seat back inserts. When folded, the part you rest your arm on was vinyl to match the seat bolsters. Your car should be the same.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
If you look at the pictures you posted, the top-when-up/front-when-down area has seam where the cloth and vinyl meet.
I had a '67 98 with a brocade and vinyl interior. The face of the armrest was brocade, matching the seat back inserts. When folded, the part you rest your arm on was vinyl to match the seat bolsters. Your car should be the same.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
#14
There are some conflicting opinions here. Here's my answer - both. With the armrest folded up, the face would be cloth to match the plain cloth of the seat backs. This cloth will face down when the armrest is folded.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
The backs of the front seat should be covered in vinyl. When sitting in the back seat, with the armrest folded up, the rearward facing portion should be vinyl to match the seat backs. With the armrest folded, this vinyl will face up and you will rest your arm on it, and it will match the vinyl on the armrests on the doors. The "beauty panel" attached to the seat frame and the armrest sides will also be vinyl, like the sides of the seat backs.
Are you saying you're installing a coupe seat in the your wagon? Coupes would have had carpeting on the frame. I'm thinking sedans and wagons may not have had any carpet at all on the front seat. It may have been vinyl from top to frame.
On the other hand, I don't want to do it if Oldsmobile never used that same logic of mixing the fabrics, which is why I followed up with OldsOlds8 and Koda and asked if they could give a little more details to their answers. I hope you still can, especially since I think you are now saying that Oldsmobile DID? use that approach on a 66 Cutlass Supreme where they put cloth on the bottom arm rest panel and vinyl on top?....
Also, what part is the "beauty panel" that you referred too and yes. The factory set-up for the wagon front bench seat had carpet along the bottom rear seat back to mimic the carpet on the door panels (I believe..?). I posted a picture of this above. This is a feature I would also like to keep on my "converted-use" folding bench seat even though my upholsterer thinks the carpet makes it more prone to tearing where the carpet is because of the movement of the seat back. He also says that carpet wasn't used on the folding front bench seats. I disagree, because I've seen a picture of a folding bench seat where only the visible, rear portion of the seat bottom had carpeting on it and my seats would rarely be folded anyway. Mostly, I think it is just extra work for him.
Thanks, Tom
Last edited by tcolt; April 19th, 2019 at 01:47 PM.
#15
Here's a photo of a '72 Supreme sedan front seat. Only shows the armrest folded down. Clearly the top part in vinyl. You can see the seam at the front edge where the vinyl meets the cloth.
Show the following image to your upholstery guy. I was looking for a picture like this. It does show carpet on the bottom. Also shows the plain cloth going up over the back of the seat. I didn't know it did that. The problem with the carpet may be that there isn't enough of your existing carpet to wrap over the top of the frame and meet the seat cushion material. You can also see the beauty panel I referred to. I don't know the technical term for it. It attaches to the divider between the seat and the base of the armrest. It covers the gap when the armrest is folded down.
Here is a '72 Supreme sedan with the armrest raised. The face of the armrest looks more like it matches the plain cloth on the seat backs than it does the vinyl on the inner sides of the seat backs.
Show the following image to your upholstery guy. I was looking for a picture like this. It does show carpet on the bottom. Also shows the plain cloth going up over the back of the seat. I didn't know it did that. The problem with the carpet may be that there isn't enough of your existing carpet to wrap over the top of the frame and meet the seat cushion material. You can also see the beauty panel I referred to. I don't know the technical term for it. It attaches to the divider between the seat and the base of the armrest. It covers the gap when the armrest is folded down.
Here is a '72 Supreme sedan with the armrest raised. The face of the armrest looks more like it matches the plain cloth on the seat backs than it does the vinyl on the inner sides of the seat backs.
#16
Well, I have until 1/14/2020 to buy a new computer. I did the disk repair last week, and have had no problems since. Tonight I notice the Microsoft logo down by the Firefox, Google, and Chrome tabs on the bottom of the screen where I log on/off. I wonder why that's there, as I haven't gone to Microsoft for anything. Well, it's a notification telling me that Windows 7 will no longer be supported after 1/14/2020 and that I need to back up my files and buy a new P.C. with Windows 10 installed, along with a tutorial featuring several ways to back up my files in order to move them to the new P.C. that I will be apparently buying after all.
#17
I was wondering the same thing, but it looks like this person might not be such a computer wizard or he fell asleep on his keyboard :-) It could also be a rogue Russian hacker trying to sow discord among Oldsmobile lovers and drive the company into extinction... Oh wait...
#18
Thanks for those cool pictures Oldsfan. I especially love the blue ones, which are exactly the same pattern as mine. Where are they from and how do you know for sure what year they are? I had been searching for proof that this pattern came not only in the full size models, but also the Cutlass Supreme which makes it legit for my VC in my eyes too (analogous to the gold color which was available in the VC :-) If the pictures are from an Olds brochure what did they call the fabrics? As far as the seem between the cloth and the vinyl at the front edge of the arm rest, it looks pretty thick. It seems like there could be piping there? I don't know what to say about the two-tone padding at the top and back of the blue seat backs. Could it be a special Supreme upgrade?
Hey Koda. If you want I'd still love to hear what you say about the other ideas. Your comments are important to me and I'm interested if you're certain that vinyl was the only available fabric for the arm rests or if you owned one. Do you agree that the pictures seem to support the partial cloth too?...
Thanks, Tom
Hey Koda. If you want I'd still love to hear what you say about the other ideas. Your comments are important to me and I'm interested if you're certain that vinyl was the only available fabric for the arm rests or if you owned one. Do you agree that the pictures seem to support the partial cloth too?...
Thanks, Tom
#20
Those pics Oldsfan posted are so cool. Those interiors look so inviting! Love the 4 door hardtops. But that brings up another question. (Not related to you question, Tom- I don't want to hijack your thread but I am curious). What did Olds do when using the seat with the center arm rest in a 4 door? I know when it was used in the 2 door either side can unlatch and swing forward to allow access to the rear seat. But in a 4 door? They probably used the same seat but made the seat back stationary?? If you look at the pics of the 4 door seats they have the stainless steel covers on the sides covering the hinge arms. When I put the 2 door seat in my Vista I just left the seat backs swingable, which I assume that's what you plan to do, Tom?
#21
Greg, my 67 442 came missing the driver's side seat back. I used, for now, a 70 split bench with armrest donor that I personally removed from a 4 door Cutlass Supreme 70. It was the same seat as the 2 door version and the back tilt worked as I folded it to get it out the front door. The wagons, on the other hand, had a solid seat back, to my knowledge, and of a lower trim level. As a automotive engineer, another thing we should consider is whether or not one could install a non folding bench in a 4 door in one piece on an assembly line. I have a feeling they took the Vista seat in through the back.
Tcolt, here's the issue and what with which I disagreed with Oldsfan above. We need to discuss trim levels. Olds trim went F85, Cutlass S (and there may be things for post cars and wagons here), Cutlass Supreme, the various 88s, then the 98, and I think the Toronado was top dog. Seat and door panel patterns are a very cheap way to make a big visual difference in the interior with very little cost impact and no functional impact. Your wagon did not come with a center armrest, and you want to put one in, and that's fine. If you redo all the seats, you can do whatever you want. If you want to adapt a trim pattern to your existing, I would shoot for a Cutlass S level trim, as I believe that is similar to the Vista trim. The Cutlass Supreme was a notch above, and we should note that Cutlass Supreme meant different things over the years. I am not a 98 expert, so I do not take issue with some statements that the 98 had a cloth front to the armrest. The various Cutlasses did not.
In the pictures linked above by Oldsfan, one can see that, even in the Cutlass Supreme, the armrest was all vinyl. I recommend you go all vinyl for multiple reasons. First, you will be touching this part with your elbow and your hand a lot, and it is easier to clean. Second, you will have to do pleats on the cloth to get it to be taut, and it will look odd unless done perfectly. Third, doing vinyl right is cheaper and easier than cloth. Fourth, it is the way Olds did it, if you want to look like a stock option.
However, it's an armrest. You can source another one and have them done both ways, if you like, then swap as needed, so I recommend that if unsure. I may even have a 72 armrest loose from that seat I mentioned to Greg.
Tcolt, here's the issue and what with which I disagreed with Oldsfan above. We need to discuss trim levels. Olds trim went F85, Cutlass S (and there may be things for post cars and wagons here), Cutlass Supreme, the various 88s, then the 98, and I think the Toronado was top dog. Seat and door panel patterns are a very cheap way to make a big visual difference in the interior with very little cost impact and no functional impact. Your wagon did not come with a center armrest, and you want to put one in, and that's fine. If you redo all the seats, you can do whatever you want. If you want to adapt a trim pattern to your existing, I would shoot for a Cutlass S level trim, as I believe that is similar to the Vista trim. The Cutlass Supreme was a notch above, and we should note that Cutlass Supreme meant different things over the years. I am not a 98 expert, so I do not take issue with some statements that the 98 had a cloth front to the armrest. The various Cutlasses did not.
In the pictures linked above by Oldsfan, one can see that, even in the Cutlass Supreme, the armrest was all vinyl. I recommend you go all vinyl for multiple reasons. First, you will be touching this part with your elbow and your hand a lot, and it is easier to clean. Second, you will have to do pleats on the cloth to get it to be taut, and it will look odd unless done perfectly. Third, doing vinyl right is cheaper and easier than cloth. Fourth, it is the way Olds did it, if you want to look like a stock option.
However, it's an armrest. You can source another one and have them done both ways, if you like, then swap as needed, so I recommend that if unsure. I may even have a 72 armrest loose from that seat I mentioned to Greg.
#22
Tom - those pics are not from brochures, but from cars for sale on the web. Here is the blue one:
http://smclassiccars.com/oldsmobile/...engine-ac.html
And here is the covert gold one:
https://www.connorsmotorcar.com/vehi...mobile-cutlass
It is hard to tell how the seam is where the cloth meets the vinyl. I've contacted a guy who is a member of the Olds clubs. He's got a '72 Supreme sedan. I've asked him a few questions about his armrest and asked if he could provide a few good pictures of it.
I looked online for a '72 Vista with the covert gold cloth interior and couldn't find any. I would imagine they didn't sell many with that trim. I would imagine it would show the dirt pretty quick, and that's probably not what people wanted in a station wagon. The Vistas I did see with the vinyl interior showed the same detail on the top of the seat back panel, but, naturally in vinyl. I guess it's going to be your call whether to use cloth or vinyl. No one will ever know what is correct. If your going to do the armrest like a Supreme sedan, then I would do the seat back upper panel the same as a Supreme sedan as well - plain cloth.
Koda - if you would care to peruse the '72 sales brochure, you will see that the Vista Cruiser does in fact share an interior with the Cutlass Supreme hardtop sedan. It is not identical because the sedan had to give up a few buttons and a few pleats to make room for the folding armrest.
http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/North...ure/index.html
In the photo of the blue interior, the armrest appears all-vinyl because we can only see the top and sides - which are vinyl. We can't see the face. That is why I included the [not very good] photo of the covert interior with the armrest up. Look at it closely. The material on the face of the armrest matched the plain cloth on the seat faces, not the lighter vinyl on the inside sides of the seat backs. And there are no pleats - it is smooth to match the plain cloth. Do not confuse the armrest on a Supreme sedan with the one in a Supreme coupe or convertible. Convertible were all-vinyl to begin with. Coupes had a different upholster pattern with a broad vinyl strip in the middle of the seat cushion, which was mimicked by an all-vinyl armrest. Supreme sedans are a different animal.
http://smclassiccars.com/oldsmobile/...engine-ac.html
And here is the covert gold one:
https://www.connorsmotorcar.com/vehi...mobile-cutlass
It is hard to tell how the seam is where the cloth meets the vinyl. I've contacted a guy who is a member of the Olds clubs. He's got a '72 Supreme sedan. I've asked him a few questions about his armrest and asked if he could provide a few good pictures of it.
I looked online for a '72 Vista with the covert gold cloth interior and couldn't find any. I would imagine they didn't sell many with that trim. I would imagine it would show the dirt pretty quick, and that's probably not what people wanted in a station wagon. The Vistas I did see with the vinyl interior showed the same detail on the top of the seat back panel, but, naturally in vinyl. I guess it's going to be your call whether to use cloth or vinyl. No one will ever know what is correct. If your going to do the armrest like a Supreme sedan, then I would do the seat back upper panel the same as a Supreme sedan as well - plain cloth.
Koda - if you would care to peruse the '72 sales brochure, you will see that the Vista Cruiser does in fact share an interior with the Cutlass Supreme hardtop sedan. It is not identical because the sedan had to give up a few buttons and a few pleats to make room for the folding armrest.
http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/North...ure/index.html
In the photo of the blue interior, the armrest appears all-vinyl because we can only see the top and sides - which are vinyl. We can't see the face. That is why I included the [not very good] photo of the covert interior with the armrest up. Look at it closely. The material on the face of the armrest matched the plain cloth on the seat faces, not the lighter vinyl on the inside sides of the seat backs. And there are no pleats - it is smooth to match the plain cloth. Do not confuse the armrest on a Supreme sedan with the one in a Supreme coupe or convertible. Convertible were all-vinyl to begin with. Coupes had a different upholster pattern with a broad vinyl strip in the middle of the seat cushion, which was mimicked by an all-vinyl armrest. Supreme sedans are a different animal.
#23
Well Tom I think you have your answer already. But I do have some experiences different than has been discussed here. I know these cars have been around for decades so its always possible things were changed before I got them. About 15 years ago I dismantled a 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop. It has the arm rest bench seat, it has the side stainless pieces just like the seat backs that tilt forward, but the seat backs are fixed. Then I picked up a ratty 1970 Supreme seat like the gold colored one shown in this thread. The arm rest face is cloth with vinyl on the back, but it doesn't have the pattern the seat does. The color is (was) the same, but no pattern. This seat is thrashed but the bones are good so I saved it as a possible core to rebuild.
OK, I just went out to take pictures and found the arm rest does have the cloth with the pattern on it underneath the vinyl that folds when it is raised or lowered.
Front seat from 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop
OK, I just went out to take pictures and found the arm rest does have the cloth with the pattern on it underneath the vinyl that folds when it is raised or lowered.
Front seat from 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop
#24
Those are some terrific and helpful pictures and I'm sure they will help Tom and his upholstery guy to get the armrest upholstered correctly. I'd have never guessed that they used pattern cloth on the underside of that filler panel. A person learns something every day...
#26
It does seem odd that all the cloth wouldn't have been patterned, and this may have been recovered over the years. But if recovered they did a good job as the seams and welting (?) all look good.
#27
These are all great responses guys, as I hoped for. Thanks especially to those who dug out parts and pictures to make their points and to the debate of each. I'm having a hard time this late at night and already under heavy medication to wrap my head all around it, but I do see fabric and vinyl and a piece of piping at the border junction line between the two. So, patterned fabric is yet another trim step combined with vinyl? That shouln't affect my likely choice of plain fabric with vinyl much except I have good pictures to show my upholsterer now on how it all goes together (problem is, he forgets to look at them and screws something up anyway.) He already glued the vinyl on the buttons with special glue and half of them already wrinkled around the edges or fell off completely. I'm nervous he can't come up with a better system that wouldn't be as subject to the hot interior temps. I thought those buttons were made up of two pieces and that the base button somehow received a cap and they both pinched the vinyl between the edges so it couldn't go anywhere. He says the vinyl was glued to the buttons at the factory too, but I've never seen any wrinkle around the edges. I think it might have been heat molded on.... He also says he couldn't get the correct size buttons anywhere. Meanwhile I'm paying him for every mistake he makes because I don't want to lose him now that it's finally starting to come together the way I want. Still, buttons peeling in a few months (or now) could ruin a $1200 upholstery job (so far)...
Thanks, Tom
Thanks, Tom
Last edited by tcolt; April 21st, 2019 at 02:04 PM.
#28
Excellent pictures John. I don't think I can understand the controversy. Does this arm rest not use vinyl at all? Is the patterned fabric visible from the outside much or just "hidden" filler/ cover pieces? Is the first picture of the top of the arm rest vinyl or where do we see vinyl? I guess, I could see some years special designs with vinyl together with the patterned fabric... What does the picture of the black seat show us?
Last edited by tcolt; April 27th, 2019 at 10:41 AM.
#29
Well Tom I think you have your answer already. But I do have some experiences different than has been discussed here....
Then I picked up a ratty 1970 Supreme seat like the gold colored one shown in this thread. The arm rest face is cloth with vinyl on the back, but it doesn't have the pattern the seat does. The color is (was) the same, but no pattern. This seat is thrashed but the bones are good so I saved it as a possible core to rebuild.
OK, I just went out to take pictures and found the arm rest does have the cloth with the pattern on it underneath the vinyl that folds when it is raised or lowered.
Front seat from 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop
Then I picked up a ratty 1970 Supreme seat like the gold colored one shown in this thread. The arm rest face is cloth with vinyl on the back, but it doesn't have the pattern the seat does. The color is (was) the same, but no pattern. This seat is thrashed but the bones are good so I saved it as a possible core to rebuild.
OK, I just went out to take pictures and found the arm rest does have the cloth with the pattern on it underneath the vinyl that folds when it is raised or lowered.
Front seat from 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop
Thanks again! Tom
#31
Hi Tom
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, its been a busy week. Here's a few views of the front bench seat I pulled out of the 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop. I wonder if it made a difference being a 4 door hardtop or 4 door post car? John
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, its been a busy week. Here's a few views of the front bench seat I pulled out of the 1968 Cutlass 4 door hardtop. I wonder if it made a difference being a 4 door hardtop or 4 door post car? John
#32
Thank you so much John.
Your pictures will definitely help my upholsterer to get those little details "right" or at least in keeping what would or could (or should?) have been found on Vista Cruiser in 1972. You've always gone out of your way to help me with pictures and two really nice doors that I used to replace some pretty good original doors that had a few dents.
Others have helped also, beginning with helping me select and build my first 200R4 transmission, 4 barrel conversion and carburetor questions, selecting colors and paint for my wagon and, more recently, figuring out which of several blue "fancy" fabrics to use on my upholstery.
I'm not even sure that I can get my upholsterer to do the level of detail that your pictures provide to me in terms of how the seems run and how the carpet sections were patterned on the bottom of the seat, following the carpet accents on the door panels. Maybe it seems silly to go to that level of detail, but to me, the satisfaction of knowing that I have something that makes as much sense as possible is worth a couple of extra hours spent on answering those questions.
Thanks again! Tom
P.S. I wonder what keeps your seat backs from folding forward?... I'm afraid I don't have a clue about any differences between a 4 door post and non-post Cutlass :-)...
Your pictures will definitely help my upholsterer to get those little details "right" or at least in keeping what would or could (or should?) have been found on Vista Cruiser in 1972. You've always gone out of your way to help me with pictures and two really nice doors that I used to replace some pretty good original doors that had a few dents.
Others have helped also, beginning with helping me select and build my first 200R4 transmission, 4 barrel conversion and carburetor questions, selecting colors and paint for my wagon and, more recently, figuring out which of several blue "fancy" fabrics to use on my upholstery.
I'm not even sure that I can get my upholsterer to do the level of detail that your pictures provide to me in terms of how the seems run and how the carpet sections were patterned on the bottom of the seat, following the carpet accents on the door panels. Maybe it seems silly to go to that level of detail, but to me, the satisfaction of knowing that I have something that makes as much sense as possible is worth a couple of extra hours spent on answering those questions.
Thanks again! Tom
P.S. I wonder what keeps your seat backs from folding forward?... I'm afraid I don't have a clue about any differences between a 4 door post and non-post Cutlass :-)...
#33
My upholsterer and I are trying to figure out why the blue fabric on the upper portion of the back of the seat back looks so light. Is it vinyl or is it the same plain cloth as on the front of the seat back? Somehow vinyl would make more sense, but in some of the pictures it looks closer to the fabric and in others it looks closer to the vinyl on the headrest and sides of the seat. Allan, don't you have a 19722 Coupe, similar to either the Cutlass or Supreme cars pictured here?
Also, is that piping that runs horizontally halfway down the seat back, below the double stitch seem or just another single stick fold?..
Thanks, Tom
Also, is that piping that runs horizontally halfway down the seat back, below the double stitch seem or just another single stick fold?..
Thanks, Tom
#34
Tom, its kinda shredded but here's some pictures of the seat backs I've got. It is the same cloth without the pattern that runs over the top, from the piping above the pattern sections to the piping on the back. I'm also including some photos of the double stitch from the backside. Not sure what the purpose is for this, maybe your upholstery guy does. Let me know if you need close-ups of anything on these seat backs. I also have the seat bottom if there's anything there you want to see too. John
#35
Wow John! I am so lucky that you really seem to have everything in stock :-)... Is this from a 1972 Cutlass or Cutlass Supreme? I wonder what the logic was of having cloth along the top of the seat back, then vinyl and then carpet along the bottom. Except, if the door panels top edge is covered with cloth too? It seems like it could get pretty dirty from kids ice cream hands hanging onto the seat back :-)... Is there any chance a lessor equipped model might have used vinyl instead of the plain cloth? My upholsterer said he's done many of these and they always used vinyl across the entire seat back. I didn't believe him, since he has a bad memory and is interested in continuing and using vinyl instead of starting over with this cloth.
The piping that your finger is pointing at seems smaller than the piping along the outer edges. Is that right? I would imagine the double stitch is only for decorative purposes?
Thanks, Tom
The piping that your finger is pointing at seems smaller than the piping along the outer edges. Is that right? I would imagine the double stitch is only for decorative purposes?
Thanks, Tom
Last edited by tcolt; June 18th, 2019 at 07:20 PM.
#36
Hi Tom
I got this seat as a core to rebuild with a bunch of other parts. Sorry, I don't remember what year it came out of, but it does have the pattern in the cloth like your photos do. Yes, the horizontal piping is much smaller than the piping that goes on the side of the seat, maybe half the size? Most of the bench seats I've had were all vinyl, so I'm thinking this may have come out of a Supreme, the seat backs tilt forward so I believe it came from a 2 door car. I think its going to be up to you if you want to use cloth or vinyl for this panel. Odds are only one in a thousand people would know what it came with from the factory, maybe less than that! Most people will be focused on the front as the patterned cloth is really pretty material. My 2 cents, but if I can provide any other photos don't hesitate to ask. John
I got this seat as a core to rebuild with a bunch of other parts. Sorry, I don't remember what year it came out of, but it does have the pattern in the cloth like your photos do. Yes, the horizontal piping is much smaller than the piping that goes on the side of the seat, maybe half the size? Most of the bench seats I've had were all vinyl, so I'm thinking this may have come out of a Supreme, the seat backs tilt forward so I believe it came from a 2 door car. I think its going to be up to you if you want to use cloth or vinyl for this panel. Odds are only one in a thousand people would know what it came with from the factory, maybe less than that! Most people will be focused on the front as the patterned cloth is really pretty material. My 2 cents, but if I can provide any other photos don't hesitate to ask. John
#37
Tom, you asked if the seat back photos I shared were from a 1972. I can eliminate 1970 as I've got a set of door panels that came from a 1970 Cutlass Supreme 4 door hardtop. These may be the same color, but the pattern is different. So can you compare your pattern with the shredded seat? If its the same then its likely from the same year as your car. Here's a few photos of the 1970 cloth pattern. John
#38
The funny thing is that these door panels look like the material on my seats. It's a little hard to tell because the contrast of the gold color vs the blue seems to make the shapes appear different, but I'd say my seat fabric looks like what you are showing on this gold door panel. I think you're saying that would make it a 1972 fabric? The pictures of your shredded seats look like they have more of a random floral pattern, wouldn't you agree? But, just as important the pictures I have of the blue front seat in a 1972 Cutlass Supreme definitely match the material I used for my seats so unless somebody is selling a Cutlass that also borrowed fabrics from a 1970 line-up to use in this 1972 Cutlass, I think I should be ok. I know that nobody will know the difference or care, but I've come so far now that it would bug me to finish with something that I know is wrong. I'll probably have to bite the bullet and order an extra yard of the plain fabric at $115 a yard to do it right.
Thanks, Tom
Thanks, Tom
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tcolt
General Discussion
8
February 18th, 2018 05:27 PM
4-ever-olds
Parts For Sale
7
November 14th, 2017 05:56 PM