General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Edelbrock Torker vs. Edelbrock Performer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 21st, 2013, 06:28 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
69CutlassAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cazenovia, NY
Posts: 206
Edelbrock Torker vs. Edelbrock Performer

I have a 455 with .472 Edelbrock Cam and lifters, 750 cfm Edelbrock carb, headers and a few other small upgrades and soon a set of C heads with a lot of performance mods. Which intake would be a better choice. I already have the Performer. Any experiences?
69CutlassAlex is offline  
Old July 22nd, 2013, 09:07 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
The Performer is your best bet compared to the Torker single plane. The Torker will not work with Ram Air setups according to the Edelbrock sight.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 22nd, 2013, 10:07 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
For your application I would run the performer especially since you already have it. If you were running more cam like around 230 or more at .050 then I would run the Torker.
chadman is offline  
Old July 29th, 2013, 01:59 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
69CutlassAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cazenovia, NY
Posts: 206
I am looking to put in a bigger cam. Looking at either .49 or .51 lift. The Edelbrock performer RPM range is Idle-5500. Any cam that is bigger than the .472 which I already have has an RPM Start Range of 1500 or higher. I would assume that putting a bigger cam with a higher RPM range with my current Edelbrock performer would be a bad idea? Thanks all
69CutlassAlex is offline  
Old July 29th, 2013, 02:48 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
Is your engine going to run at 6500+ rpm? If not then the Performer is the manifold for you.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 29th, 2013, 05:59 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
69CutlassAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cazenovia, NY
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Is your engine going to run at 6500+ rpm? If not then the Performer is the manifold for you.
Even if I put a bigger cam in? My main concern is the initial overlap. Having a idle-5500 intake and a 1500-6500 cam. Is that slight offset bad? Don't you typically want a match RPM Operating range?
69CutlassAlex is offline  
Old July 29th, 2013, 06:39 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,524
It's a package, here is a good article but read the whole thing:

http://www.enginelabs.com/engine-tec...or-dual-plane/
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 30th, 2013, 04:47 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
For what you are doing there will not be an appreciable difference. If you were looking for better times at the drag strip I would go with the Torker but for a mild street car you won't notice a "seat of the pants" difference. You said you are looking to change cams but only listed possible lift numbers. It's more the duration @ .050 and the LSA that determine the "attitude" so to speak of the cam much more so than the lift.
chadman is offline  
Old July 30th, 2013, 08:18 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
69CutlassAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cazenovia, NY
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by chadman
For what you are doing there will not be an appreciable difference. If you were looking for better times at the drag strip I would go with the Torker but for a mild street car you won't notice a "seat of the pants" difference. You said you are looking to change cams but only listed possible lift numbers. It's more the duration @ .050 and the LSA that determine the "attitude" so to speak of the cam much more so than the lift.
ok thanks, Currently Ive got so much torque I don't know what to do with, so im looking to up my midrange performance. My Current Cam is(duration/lift/lobeseperation)214° / 224°.472" / .496"112°
I also read that the camshaft and the Intake don't have to be exactly matched when it comes to RPM operation range but its good to have it within 500-1000 RPMs.
69CutlassAlex is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
classicjoe
Parts For Sale
2
May 5th, 2013 06:28 PM
rhurstolds74
Parts For Sale
4
January 20th, 2013 03:39 PM
455cutlass1969
Big Blocks
1
April 9th, 2012 11:13 AM
70Cutlass_408
Small Blocks
2
June 24th, 2011 07:55 AM
alek72us
Big Blocks
11
March 1st, 2011 05:50 PM



Quick Reply: Edelbrock Torker vs. Edelbrock Performer



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 PM.