What's wrong with this picture ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 22nd, 2013, 05:20 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blackpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 642
What's wrong with this picture ?

Does anybody do ANY research on where things go before attempting a resto ? See pics. Here's the link too - http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1971-...item27cf1e9863
Attached Images
Blackpage is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 10:37 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
m371961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sistersville, WV
Posts: 2,163
You only look at one side of the car at a time.
m371961 is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 12:11 PM
  #3  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Originally Posted by Blackpage
Does anybody do ANY research on where things go before attempting a resto ? See pics. Here's the link too - http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1971-...item27cf1e9863
Well you could start a list of what's wrong, but the seller doesn't claim the car is a restoration - just that the PO had bodywork done before; then lists what he's done to it. The obvious flaws and repairs needed would be bargaining tools for the buyer. No way that car is going to be in the high retail category because you don't stand 20 feet away and look at the interior. I do believe the seller is not trying to hide anything based on the pics though.

Some proof reading of the ad reveals some wording problems too, but they are easy to work around.
Allan R is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 12:13 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
woodie582's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Santa Rosa Ca
Posts: 398
Can't see where he claims to have done a "resto"?
woodie582 is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 12:48 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
Looks like a decent 40yr old car with an OK paintjob. There is some mudwork in the driver's 1/4. Not sure where else,but that is the most obvious from a glance.
507OLDS is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 01:04 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Blackpage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 642
I wasn't talking about the seller in particular. I'm talking about the person that decided where to apply the body side and chrome trims. It looks hideous.
Blackpage is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 01:14 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
vette442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: McMurray, PA
Posts: 1,781
The stock stainless trim is in the right place for a 70-71 Supreme (except for the missing fender piece).

The pieces up higher on the sides are aftermarket stick-on vinyl side protection trim - I've seen that on numerous 70-71 Supremes, even in really old pics from when the cars were fairly new. The lower side stainless trim offers no protection for the middle and upper half of the side body panels, so it's pretty likely that the trim was stuck on to that car many years ago, more for dent protection than for whether it was correct.

I agree it isn't very attractive, but it's not like they put the factory pieces in the wrong place.

Terry
vette442 is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 05:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
those vinyl door gaurds were real popular in the late 70s early 80s. I remember everyone buying them to help prevent door dings. Must admit they do look hideous now but back then they were the "in" thing

Last edited by stevengerard; January 22nd, 2013 at 06:00 PM.
stevengerard is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 05:35 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
White_Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Spokane Washington
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by vette442
The pieces up higher on the sides are aftermarket stick-on vinyl side protection trim - I've seen that on numerous 70-71 Supremes, even in ...
Man, I remember that stuff sold at auto stores in a "kit". Came in a roll with finished end pieces for like 20 bucks. It was a door ding protector that looked worse than a few dings.

What I remember is seeing owner installs where it was angular or most common, looked like a snake trail, all wiggly!! Buy hey, it came in burgundy for the classy man.
White_Knuckles is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 03:21 PM
  #10  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Well the good thing about that stuff is you can peel it off carefully and just polish the paint underneath. Better than that aluminum rail with vinyl inserts that you'd have to drill holes for riveting.
Allan R is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 06:11 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
Spray some WD40 on it, that will help get it off (seriously it works)
I was partial to the stainless door edge guards, not that chrome plastic crap
TripDeuces is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 06:32 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,502
I think the 2 differant mirrors would drive me nuts looking at. I would have to change that.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MDchanic
Non-Olds Engines
17
May 23rd, 2013 08:20 PM
joe_padavano
General Discussion
14
March 5th, 2013 05:26 PM
kjr442
General Discussion
21
July 25th, 2011 02:11 PM
MDchanic
General Discussion
21
November 3rd, 2010 12:48 PM
don71
Small Blocks
5
March 23rd, 2008 02:27 PM



Quick Reply: What's wrong with this picture ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 PM.