UMI vs Currie 'Currectrac' rear LCA's...
#1
UMI vs Currie 'Currectrac' rear LCA's...
At present I have the Hotchkis TVS kit, but I don't like the rigidity (at least look/feel wise so far) of the rear LCA's (1302's). I am concerned about 'binding'.
I recently ordered the Currie Currectrac rear LCA's (yet to arrive), but looking more at the UMI poly/joint boxed arms @ http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=375 (pn #4041)... they look more appealing being steel.
Opinions on which is/might be better? I notice UMI puts the joint on the 'axle' side, whereas most others seem to put the joint on the 'frame' side when the opposite end is a poly or whatever type std. bushing.
I recently ordered the Currie Currectrac rear LCA's (yet to arrive), but looking more at the UMI poly/joint boxed arms @ http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=375 (pn #4041)... they look more appealing being steel.
Opinions on which is/might be better? I notice UMI puts the joint on the 'axle' side, whereas most others seem to put the joint on the 'frame' side when the opposite end is a poly or whatever type std. bushing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldzy
Suspension & Handling
5
June 19th, 2011 07:56 PM
oldzy
Suspension & Handling
0
January 2nd, 2011 04:20 PM