UMI vs Currie 'Currectrac' rear LCA's...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 7th, 2011, 12:11 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
oldzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 1,450
UMI vs Currie 'Currectrac' rear LCA's...

At present I have the Hotchkis TVS kit, but I don't like the rigidity (at least look/feel wise so far) of the rear LCA's (1302's). I am concerned about 'binding'.

I recently ordered the Currie Currectrac rear LCA's (yet to arrive), but looking more at the UMI poly/joint boxed arms @ http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=375 (pn #4041)... they look more appealing being steel.

Opinions on which is/might be better? I notice UMI puts the joint on the 'axle' side, whereas most others seem to put the joint on the 'frame' side when the opposite end is a poly or whatever type std. bushing.
oldzy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jims2000lt
Parts For Sale
0
August 7th, 2013 07:59 PM
oldzy
Suspension & Handling
5
June 19th, 2011 07:56 PM
oldzy
Suspension & Handling
0
January 2nd, 2011 04:20 PM
BerBer5985
Suspension & Handling
17
September 24th, 2009 11:26 AM



Quick Reply: UMI vs Currie 'Currectrac' rear LCA's...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:08 PM.