Drum to Disk disappointment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 14th, 2017, 04:59 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Drum to Disk disappointment

Short while ago I got this kit assembled to my -69 Cutlass:

https://www.summitracing.com/int/par...123-1/reviews/


and I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. The stopping power was better with original power drum setup. At the same time I have swapped the engine with cam, having 12hg vacuum at idle. Less than with stock engine, did not measure vacuum with that. Also, this kit has smaller booster(9" compared to 11") than original was. What can I do to improve the situation? Go back with original booster, will it fit? Smaller sized master cylinder, I think this one is 1,1/8". Electric vacuum pump? What do you recommend. I would have assumed this kit to be at least equal to drums, but it's not.
slade69 is offline  
Old July 14th, 2017, 06:41 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
Is your proportioning valve adjusted correctly so you have all 4 brakes operating? Is your brake pedal rod in the lower hole and adjusted for full travel? While most power brake systems are designed to run on 13in of vacuum, the brakes should still be ok at 12. Do you have good pedal or is it spongy and still needing to be bled some more? Did you bench bleed the master cylinder?
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 14th, 2017, 02:54 PM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by slade69
At the same time I have swapped the engine with cam, having 12hg vacuum at idle. Less than with stock engine, did not measure vacuum with that. Also, this kit has smaller booster(9" compared to 11") than original was.
So you have a double whammy.

Vacuum booster power depends on two things (besides pedal pressure), the area of the diaphragm and the vacuum pressure. Area goes with radius squared. The 11" booster has nearly 50% MORE area than the 9" and thus nearly 50% more pressure. Dropping the idle vacuum from about 17" to 12" ALSO drops pressure by about another 40%, so you have maybe 40% of the original booster force.

The other issue is hydraulic system master and slave cylinder areas. the smaller the M/C and the larger the wheel cylinders, the lower the pedal effort (or the higher the braking force for a give pedal pressure). What are the caliper piston diameters on those aftermarket calipers? Stock were 2.75". Smaller will reduce braking force.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 14th, 2017, 03:37 PM
  #4  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
For some reason I thought it was a double diaphram booster. Unfortunately it is not.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 10:32 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Is your proportioning valve adjusted correctly so you have all 4 brakes operating? Is your brake pedal rod in the lower hole and adjusted for full travel? While most power brake systems are designed to run on 13in of vacuum, the brakes should still be ok at 12. Do you have good pedal or is it spongy and still needing to be bled some more? Did you bench bleed the master cylinder?


Adjusting the proportion valve seems not make dramatical change how the brakes feel. Pedal rod is in the lower hole. Changing it to upper hole might help some, by increasing the leverage. Pedal is not soft or spongy. I did not bench bleed the M/C. I'm bleeding with vacuum pump through bleeding screws. I really don't understand the meaning of bench bleed, you have to bleed it anyhow when you have everything assembled.
slade69 is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 10:46 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
So you have a double whammy.

Vacuum booster power depends on two things (besides pedal pressure), the area of the diaphragm and the vacuum pressure. Area goes with radius squared. The 11" booster has nearly 50% MORE area than the 9" and thus nearly 50% more pressure. Dropping the idle vacuum from about 17" to 12" ALSO drops pressure by about another 40%, so you have maybe 40% of the original booster force.

The other issue is hydraulic system master and slave cylinder areas. the smaller the M/C and the larger the wheel cylinders, the lower the pedal effort (or the higher the braking force for a give pedal pressure). What are the caliper piston diameters on those aftermarket calipers? Stock were 2.75". Smaller will reduce braking force.

All your points are facts. It does not feel like air in the system, pedal is hard, just the pedal-force needed to stop the car is too much. I have to investigatete possibility to use original drum booster with this kit.. And maybe smaller diameter M/C, 1" is what I'm thinking of. The wheel calipers have 71mm (2,75") pistons. I do not understand why almost every conversion kit has smaller than stock booster.
I have never unassembled M/C. Are the pistons for front and rear circuits same or different in size?
slade69 is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 10:55 AM
  #7  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,521
Originally Posted by slade69
Adjusting the proportion valve seems not make dramatical change how the brakes feel. Pedal rod is in the lower hole. Changing it to upper hole might help some, by increasing the leverage. Pedal is not soft or spongy. I did not bench bleed the M/C. I'm bleeding with vacuum pump through bleeding screws. I really don't understand the meaning of bench bleed, you have to bleed it anyhow when you have everything assembled.
Besides that the upper hole is for manual brakes only, you can't put the rod in the upper hole as the angle is too great and it will break the booster seal. Bench bleeding the master cylinder means bleeding it before installing. The master cylinder is mounted at an angle and may trap air.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 10:55 AM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by slade69
I have to investigatete possibility to use original drum booster with this kit..
I've done plenty of swaps and just reused the original booster. The disc M/C bolts right up.

And maybe smaller diameter M/C, 1" is what I'm thinking of.
That will help.

I do not understand why almost every conversion kit has smaller than stock booster.
I don't understand why people buy kits with smaller than stock boosters. This is high school physics.

I have never unassembled M/C. Are the pistons for front and rear circuits same or different in size?
Yes, for these M/Cs. Very few use different size pistons due to the added cost of manufacturing with a step in the bore. The Astro vans were one such application.

And the reason why you want to bench bleed is that when installed in the car, the M/C can be at an angle that traps air in the end of the bore. On the bench is is presumably flat. Of course, jacking the car so the M/C is flat does the same thing.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 10:59 AM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Besides that the upper hole is for manual brakes only, you can't put the rod in the upper hole as the angle is too great and it will break the booster seal.
Unfortunately, I've seen gorillas do exactly that - and worse!
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 15th, 2017, 11:57 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
edzolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Red Oak, Texas
Posts: 2,960
Originally Posted by slade69
Adjusting the proportion valve seems not make dramatical change how the brakes feel.
Is the proportioning valve plumbed correctly. They will not work if the pressure is plumbed into the wrong side. Also the reason these kits come with the smaller diaphragm, is they are cheaper and sometimes there is no room for the larger booster. Is the "bullet" inserted in the master cylinder if it needs it?

Last edited by edzolz; July 15th, 2017 at 11:59 AM.
edzolz is offline  
Old July 16th, 2017, 06:08 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
seansolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Hebron, indiana
Posts: 418
You can purchase or rent a Brake Pressure psi tool, this tool can be used to symmetrically balance Left to Right Disc, Left to Right Drum or all Four Disc or all four Drum. You may have to check with the recommended PSI requirements per the Kit you are using. This tool can find mechanical or human error with the system and eliminates the guess work out of the equation.
Hope this helps.
Sean
seansolds is offline  
Old July 18th, 2017, 01:46 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Thanks for the comments! Because I'm pretty sure there is nothing assembled wrong, I'll start to change components one by one to see the effect. The first one will be smaller diameter M/C. Going from 1.125" to 1". Starting with M/C first, because I'd like to keep the new 9" booster.


If there is something to learn here, DON'T belive in kits sold. I was trying to let myself easy and purhase a kit with everything needed, assuming the part combination is already figured out to work well together. I was wrong. Should have figure out what is really needed and buy everything separately.
slade69 is offline  
Old July 19th, 2017, 05:22 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano

And the reason why you want to bench bleed is that when installed in the car, the M/C can be at an angle that traps air in the end of the bore. On the bench is is presumably flat. Of course, jacking the car so the M/C is flat does the same thing.

I' about to change the M/C to a smaller one, and still wondering the bench bleed procedure. Ok, the M/C when assembled is at angle, and you should bench bleed it level. But how the heck you prevent air going in the M/C after bench bleed and during assembly?
slade69 is offline  
Old July 19th, 2017, 06:57 AM
  #14  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by slade69
But how the heck you prevent air going in the M/C after bench bleed and during assembly?
Physics. With the M/C filled and the the cap and rubber seal in place, there is no vent to allow air into the reservoir, so there is no way for fluid to leak out. Same principle as when you put your finger over the end of a straw and pull it out of the glass full of soda - the soda stays in the straw.

Will some fluid dribble out? Yeah, but very little. Certainly plugs in the outlet ports will help.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 19th, 2017, 12:25 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
1970greensupreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Haven CT
Posts: 239
If you could get two 2000 psi gauges your gonna ultimately want about 1500-1700 psi in front and 800-1000 in rear on a hard stop. Start there. The rear pressure won't be linier, front should pretty much be. You could do it with the car running and have the gauges screw into the bleeders and have somebody operate the brakes.
1970greensupreme is offline  
Old July 20th, 2017, 06:23 AM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Physics. With the M/C filled and the the cap and rubber seal in place, there is no vent to allow air into the reservoir, so there is no way for fluid to leak out. Same principle as when you put your finger over the end of a straw and pull it out of the glass full of soda - the soda stays in the straw.

Will some fluid dribble out? Yeah, but very little. Certainly plugs in the outlet ports will help.


Now that makes sense. Why is that not told in the bench bleed instructions?!? They tell nothing about capping the reservoir when the bench bleed is done.... Should have figured out myself... feel stupid


Joe, do you happen to know was there a manual brake disk/drum cutlass ever made by factory?
slade69 is offline  
Old July 20th, 2017, 06:43 AM
  #17  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by slade69
Joe, do you happen to know was there a manual brake disk/drum cutlass ever made by factory?
My 70 W-30, for one. This was offered on the 70-72 W-30 and 70 W-31 as part of the W-package. The manual disks were actually introduced in mid-year 1969 on the 69 W-cars.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 20th, 2017, 11:14 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
My 70 W-30, for one. This was offered on the 70-72 W-30 and 70 W-31 as part of the W-package. The manual disks were actually introduced in mid-year 1969 on the 69 W-cars.


I quess factory made them with manual brakes due to low vacuum of the hi-perf engine? Do you happen to know the M/C and front caliper piston sizes? How is the pedal feel and pedal force needed?
slade69 is offline  
Old July 21st, 2017, 03:22 AM
  #19  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by slade69
I quess factory made them with manual brakes due to low vacuum of the hi-perf engine? Do you happen to know the M/C and front caliper piston sizes? How is the pedal feel and pedal force needed?
Yes, exactly due to the 328/328 cam in the manual trans cars. M/C is 1", pistons in the calipers are the same 2.75" as all others. Pedal ratio is obviously different from power brakes. I never had a problem stopping nor did I ever feel the need for power brakes. I am quite happy with those brakes.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 21st, 2017, 05:05 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
joesw31's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,399
Joe,


The 1970 manual disc brake cars used a 1 1/8 master cylinder bore. The books indicate that they used a 1 inch bore, but that is an error on the part of Oldsmobile.
joesw31 is offline  
Old July 22nd, 2017, 08:34 AM
  #21  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by joesw31
Joe,


The 1970 manual disc brake cars used a 1 1/8 master cylinder bore. The books indicate that they used a 1 inch bore, but that is an error on the part of Oldsmobile.
That may be true, but it makes no sense. The larger bore on the MC will increase the required pedal pressure (though reducing pedal travel). I'm pretty sure the MC in my 70 has been replaced. I wonder if it's 1". I'll have to investigate.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 23rd, 2017, 01:21 AM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
This is from 442.com:


1970 - 1972 Master Cylinders


There was some discussion earlier regarding the differences between the 1970-1972 master cylinders. Hopefully the following info will help: 1970 Power disc. All models (1st design. Dual bail) 1.125" bore.
1970 Power disc. All models (2nd design. Single bail) 1.125" bore.
1970 Manual disc (including W-30) dual bail. 1" bore.
1970-1972 Power or manual drums. Single bail. 1" bore.
1971-1972 Power disc. (incl. W-30). 1.125" bore. (Same as '70 2nd type).
1971-1972 Manual disc (W-30). Dual bail. 1" bore.


I believe it has originally been 1". Also found a good story of a guy testing different components trying to achieve good manual brakes:


http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/manu...dy-212363.html


According to that, 1" seems to be the best size with 2,75" calipers.... 7/8" does not have enough volume.
slade69 is offline  
Old July 23rd, 2017, 03:03 AM
  #23  
ph_ckstick1
 
midnightleadfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 450
Originally Posted by slade69
All your points are facts. It does not feel like air in the system, pedal is hard, just the pedal-force needed to stop the car is too much. I have to investigatete possibility to use original drum booster with this kit.. And maybe smaller diameter M/C, 1" is what I'm thinking of. The wheel calipers have 71mm (2,75") pistons. I do not understand why almost every conversion kit has smaller than stock booster.
I have never unassembled M/C. Are the pistons for front and rear circuits same or different in size?
The small booster is so those with tall valve covers and/or have to lash valves..


Get a dual diapham 9" booster and call it a day..
And maybe a vacuum pump..
Many use the s-10 booster.. not sure what years..
Low vac. cam I'd have gone hydroboost..
Is the one way check valve in the vacuum system?
What pads came with this kit ? are they street pads or street track pads that need heat in them to get the stopping out of them..
Did you break in the pads correctly?


Stainless steel brake company has been around a long time..
I'd pause and drop the idea of try'n to re engineer their kit.. and find what is wrong..
not bedding in the pads correctly, and lack of vacuum , I'd be looking at.. along with what type pads came with the kit..
I had a kit that didn't stop well at all, but after some heat in it would put you through the windshield if you were not careful..


good luck..
midnightleadfoot is offline  
Old July 23rd, 2017, 05:10 AM
  #24  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by midnightleadfoot
low vac. Cam i'd have gone hydroboost..
^^^this!
joe_padavano is offline  
Old August 1st, 2017, 01:34 AM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
I got the 1" master assembled and 1,125" out. After bleeding the system, I got brakes again. They are not exellent, but good enough for safe driving. Now I just have to use them and get the pads bedded in properly.


In some point I will try manual set up. I have everything similar(dimension-wise) to W-31 manual brakes. Just have to remove the booster , relocate the master and use the upper hole in the pedal.


I really don't want the hassle with hydroboost (expensive) or electric vacuum pump. Sure they are working solutions, but I like to keep things simple as possible.


After all, the original power drums are quite ok, when in good working order. Drum brakes self boosting feature helps a lot, and that is something missing from disk brakes. You need more line pressure with disks, that's for sure.


I think many enthusiast may have too optimistic expectations when converting from drums to disks, at leat I had
slade69 is offline  
Old August 1st, 2017, 01:24 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by midnightleadfoot

Stainless steel brake company has been around a long time..
I'd pause and drop the idea of try'n to re engineer their kit.. and find what is wrong..
not bedding in the pads correctly, and lack of vacuum , I'd be looking at.. along with what type pads came with the kit..
I had a kit that didn't stop well at all, but after some heat in it would put you through the windshield if you were not careful..


good luck..

You are probably right. The kit might work ok with high vacuum (17hg or more) stock engine. It's even told in the instructions that this kit needs 17hg of vacuum pressure. Stupid me I was not doing my homework properly. Kit was not right for my application with 12hg at idle. Smaller M/C was the cure for me. Bigger area booster, for example my stock drum booster, or another 11" one would help even more.
The pads in the kit are probably regular street ones. I'm still in the process of breaking them in. I assume the bite will better when this is done.
The loss of kit's original iron 1,125" M/C is not a big thing, replaced it with much nicer and much lighter Wilwood 1". I'm getting something back by selling the ugly one.
slade69 is offline  
Old August 1st, 2017, 01:27 PM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by midnightleadfoot


Is the one way check valve in the vacuum system?

I belive this is the plastic part in the booster where the manifold vacuum hose connects to? Correct me if I'm wrong?
slade69 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
delmontcrusier
General Discussion
63
May 28th, 2023 07:37 AM
Troys Toy 70
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
2
June 7th, 2012 04:29 PM
69convertible
Ninety-Eight
25
February 5th, 2009 01:43 PM
perro
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
4
September 3rd, 2007 01:30 PM
ncwitte
Ninety-Eight
9
April 12th, 2007 05:03 AM



Quick Reply: Drum to Disk disappointment



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 AM.