A "Different" '68 Cutlass Hood Hinge Question
#1
A "Different" '68 Cutlass Hood Hinge Question
I've been a member on here for a long time but never got around to posting before......
I already know there have been a thousand questions asked about the difference between '68 and all other year hinges....I understand the difference....but my question is different.
My '68 Cutlass Supreme has what I "believe" to be the original hood, both hinges and both fenders still on it. My driver's hinge only has two mounting holes to mount the hood to the hinge and my passenger side has three. (Again, to mount the hood to the hinge, not the hinge to the fender.)
I have found a picture on here where the original poster's pic is the exact opposite of mine, this all came to my attention when I acquired another hood off a '68 Cutlass where both sides had three bolts to mount the hood.
I also have no spacers between the two so I'm pretty sure it's been apart before.
Not particularly important I guess since I could probably jam a spacer in the non drilled hinge, but it's more a curiosity for me....has anyone else noticed the difference in the '68 only hinges?
I already know there have been a thousand questions asked about the difference between '68 and all other year hinges....I understand the difference....but my question is different.
My '68 Cutlass Supreme has what I "believe" to be the original hood, both hinges and both fenders still on it. My driver's hinge only has two mounting holes to mount the hood to the hinge and my passenger side has three. (Again, to mount the hood to the hinge, not the hinge to the fender.)
I have found a picture on here where the original poster's pic is the exact opposite of mine, this all came to my attention when I acquired another hood off a '68 Cutlass where both sides had three bolts to mount the hood.
I also have no spacers between the two so I'm pretty sure it's been apart before.
Not particularly important I guess since I could probably jam a spacer in the non drilled hinge, but it's more a curiosity for me....has anyone else noticed the difference in the '68 only hinges?
#2
I've been a member on here for a long time but never got around to posting before......
I already know there have been a thousand questions asked about the difference between '68 and all other year hinges....I understand the difference....but my question is different.
My '68 Cutlass Supreme has what I "believe" to be the original hood, both hinges and both fenders still on it. My driver's hinge only has two mounting holes to mount the hood to the hinge and my passenger side has three. (Again, to mount the hood to the hinge, not the hinge to the fender.)
I have found a picture on here where the original poster's pic is the exact opposite of mine, this all came to my attention when I acquired another hood off a '68 Cutlass where both sides had three bolts to mount the hood.
I also have no spacers between the two so I'm pretty sure it's been apart before.
Not particularly important I guess since I could probably jam a spacer in the non drilled hinge, but it's more a curiosity for me....has anyone else noticed the difference in the '68 only hinges?
I already know there have been a thousand questions asked about the difference between '68 and all other year hinges....I understand the difference....but my question is different.
My '68 Cutlass Supreme has what I "believe" to be the original hood, both hinges and both fenders still on it. My driver's hinge only has two mounting holes to mount the hood to the hinge and my passenger side has three. (Again, to mount the hood to the hinge, not the hinge to the fender.)
I have found a picture on here where the original poster's pic is the exact opposite of mine, this all came to my attention when I acquired another hood off a '68 Cutlass where both sides had three bolts to mount the hood.
I also have no spacers between the two so I'm pretty sure it's been apart before.
Not particularly important I guess since I could probably jam a spacer in the non drilled hinge, but it's more a curiosity for me....has anyone else noticed the difference in the '68 only hinges?
There was an early assembly manual change dated 9/25/67 that went from two bolts to three. Your car must have gotten one of each
Last edited by allyolds68; October 9th, 2017 at 02:02 PM.
#3
I do know it's an early build car based off the sequence number in the VIN but I haven't fully researched it all yet. That makes sense though, thank you so much for the information.
#4
You can check the trim tag on your driver side cowl (just under the hood) to determine the build date of your car. There should be something like a two digit number, followed by a letter. The first two digits tell the month and the letter gives the week of that month. For instance, if the time build code on your trim tag said 09C, the build date of your car would be September (09), the third week of that month (C), 1967 (the '68 production year started in mid-August 1967).
Randy C.
Randy C.
#5
You can check the trim tag on your driver side cowl (just under the hood) to determine the build date of your car. There should be something like a two digit number, followed by a letter. The first two digits tell the month and the letter gives the week of that month. For instance, if the time build code on your trim tag said 09C, the build date of your car would be September (09), the third week of that month (C), 1967 (the '68 production year started in mid-August 1967).
Randy C.
Randy C.
I wish I could decode it but unfortunately the original trim tag has been pried off the cowl for some reason and I didn't get it with the car. It sure would answer a lot of questions though. Other than approximating using the sequence number, is there another way to possibly determine a build date range?
Brian
#7
My sequence number is 102613, built in Fremont. If anyone happens to have a close number and know the build date of their car, I would definitely be interested in knowing about when mine was built.
I don't remember right off hand what the cast date of my motor is but I do know it doesn't necessarily always correlate. However mine might be early enough that it does.....
#8
For instance, if the time build code on your trim tag said 09C, the build date of your car would be September (09), the third week of that month (C), 1967 (the '68 production year started in mid-August 1967).
There was an early assembly manual change dated 9/25/67 that went from two bolts to three.
#9
Like Lansing, BOP plants followed the assembly manual. I've heard that it took a little longer to make changes at the BOP plants but don't really have any hard evidence or timeline as to how much longer that was.
For reference, the 7028253 carb for the 68 442 4 speed was added by assembly manual revision dated 4/29/68. The first known casting date for a 7028253 carb is 6/1/68 so it's doubtful that they started using this carb until early June of 1968
#10
Like Lansing, BOP plants followed the assembly manual. I've heard that it took a little longer to make changes at the BOP plants but don't really have any hard evidence or timeline as to how much longer that was.
For reference, the 7028253 carb for the 68 442 4 speed was added by assembly manual revision dated 4/29/68. The first known casting date for a 7028253 carb is 6/1/68 so it's doubtful that they started using this carb until early June of 1968
For reference, the 7028253 carb for the 68 442 4 speed was added by assembly manual revision dated 4/29/68. The first known casting date for a 7028253 carb is 6/1/68 so it's doubtful that they started using this carb until early June of 1968
I don't have shoulder belts either, and for what it's worth since I don't have my trim tag, I DO have the original motor and the block was cast Sep 28, 1967. So.....mine was built between presumably Oct 1ish to Dec 31 1967....a little more evidence of a possible delay in following production changes?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RetroRanger
Parts For Sale
11
December 15th, 2018 05:28 AM
shamusj
Body work
3
May 6th, 2018 06:03 PM
olds70supreme
General Discussion
1
June 2nd, 2017 10:45 AM
shaks 442 clone
Chassis/Body/Frame
6
August 4th, 2007 09:56 PM