Difference in auto & MT intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 3rd, 2009, 05:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
Difference in auto & MT intake?

Planning on converting my 71 442 conv. to a 4spd. down the road. I have been gathering all parts before hand. Is there a difference between intake manifolds for auto and MT cars?
scrappie is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 05:30 AM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by scrappie
Planning on converting my 71 442 conv. to a 4spd. down the road. I have been gathering all parts before hand. Is there a difference between intake manifolds for auto and MT cars?
In 1971, yes there is. The MT cars used an intake with the PCV valve in the manifold behind the coolant crossover. This is the same location as the W-30 intakes, but the MT intake was cast iron, not aluminum. Casting number 407567, code letter R. These are pretty rare. Unless you care about complete correctness, you can use your current intake.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 06:00 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
Thanks Joe, So if I were to find the correct intake what would I do with the PCV valve inlet in the valve cover?
scrappie is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 06:04 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
Now that I think about it That is probably were the PCV valve hose connects instead of carb? right?
scrappie is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 07:09 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by scrappie
Thanks Joe, So if I were to find the correct intake what would I do with the PCV valve inlet in the valve cover?
The MT cars had two breathers, both going to the air cleaner.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 10:32 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
I understand the difference now. Why did Olds design it two different ways? Was it a vacuum thing or performance?

Last edited by scrappie; January 3rd, 2009 at 03:54 PM.
scrappie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ignachuck
General Discussion
0
June 12th, 2015 05:29 PM
svnt442
Parts For Sale
3
July 17th, 2011 04:43 PM
BIGJERR
Parts For Sale
0
June 1st, 2010 08:05 AM
ctrain22
Big Blocks
3
April 26th, 2009 08:19 AM
68Tom
General Discussion
0
April 9th, 2009 07:11 AM



Quick Reply: Difference in auto & MT intake?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:40 AM.