Thinking about to remove the engine number id's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 12th, 2015, 12:44 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
Thinking about to remove the engine number id's

Delete thread please

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:13 PM. Reason: delete thread please?
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 02:29 AM
  #2  
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
rustyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Margate, England
Posts: 2,513
Is this legal in Norway?.
How does the size of the engine in your car affect you?, bigger vehicle taxes perhaps?

Without knowing a lot more about Norwegian vehicle law I can't give any meaningful advice. But unless you have a compelling reason for this I would leave it alone. I make this statement based on how things are done in the UK, not Norway, more information please!.

Roger.
rustyroger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 03:17 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:13 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 03:57 AM
  #4  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Realistically, is any officer doing a spot-check going to know the difference between a big block and a small block engine?

US automakers did not cast the engine displacement into the block or cylinders the way European automakers were required to, so unless they know the casting numbers for the different blocks, there is no way that they could possibly tell your displacement.

Besides, there were no differences in brakes or suspension between big block and small block cars (except the 442 and the availability of optional packages).

Originally Posted by Oldsragger
i dont know how it is in the U.S about rules about custombuilds,engine swaps and Things like that.
We have no rules about it. You can put any engine into any car at any time without having to ask anyone's permission or file any forms.
In some states, though, like California, if the original engine had emission controls, the new one must have the same emission controls, or newer ones (though even in California cars older than something like 1975 are exempt).

In more than half the US states, there is no safety inspection of any kind, so you never have to worry about this nonsense, and in even more states, there is no safety inspection for antique cars.


My vote: Leave it alone and don't worry about it.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 04:11 AM
  #5  
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
rustyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Margate, England
Posts: 2,513
Originally Posted by MDchanic
US automakers did not cast the engine displacement into the block or cylinders the way European automakers were required to, so unless they know the casting numbers for the different blocks, there is no way that they could possibly tell your displacement.- Eric
Are you sure Eric?. Ford Pinto (European) engines had their sizes cast as raised letters, BMC diesel engines were marked 1.5D and 1.8D, but this was to signify they were diesel blocks.
I can't think of any other engines with any means for its size to be identified by anyone unfamiliar with them, besides in a modern European car it takes some time simply to remove enough covers to even see the engine.

Roger.
rustyroger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 05:06 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:15 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 06:19 AM
  #7  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by rustyroger
Are you sure Eric?. Ford Pinto (European) engines had their sizes cast as raised letters, BMC diesel engines were marked 1.5D and 1.8D, but this was to signify they were diesel blocks.
I didn't say that US companies NEVER indicated displacement, just that it wasn't generally done.

The Pinto motor, if I recall, was a creation of Ford Germany, and was used in European cars far more extensively than in American cars, so I would class it as a European engine that happened to be used on some American cars, and as such, it would have had its displacement indicated.

I would challenge you (okay, Joe, too) to come up with a traditional American engine (straight-6, V-6, or V-8) made before about 1980, that had a legally useful displacement indication (some 1980-ish engines, like the 307 and the 260, come to mind as those WITH an indication).

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 07:12 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
stan 65 cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: duncan bc
Posts: 1,483
ive been considering painting my 425 gold, like the original 330. other than a real olds guy noone would know its a big block
stan 65 cutlass is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 07:21 AM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by MDchanic
I would challenge you (okay, Joe, too) to come up with a traditional American engine (straight-6, V-6, or V-8) made before about 1980, that had a legally useful displacement indication (some 1980-ish engines, like the 307 and the 260, come to mind as those WITH an indication).

- Eric
You know better than to do that...

joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 07:42 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:16 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 07:47 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:17 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 07:50 AM
  #12  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by Oldsragger
is that a 403 block ? what is that block on the engineblock? making sb to bb size?
Yes, that's a 403 (build 1977-1979, thus meeting Eric's pre-1980 cutoff).

The plate on the block is called a deck plate. It's used when boring a block to mimic the distortion that the block undergoes when the heads are torqued. If you don't use a deck plate (and most machine shops do not) the cylinders will be round in the unstressed state, but once you torque the heads into place, the bores will no longer be round, potentially causing ring sealing problems.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 08:25 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
TGroth.jpg (150.1 KB, 41 views)

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:18 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 09:19 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
I have made a 403 look like a 307 by removing the "4A" from the heads and putting "5A" there. One can disguise a 425 as a 350 so that the car would appear to have an original type engine. Just removing the casting ID is probably enough, but you could add "350" in an obvious spot or the actual casting number of a 350 or whatever you want. As long as it doesn't cause legal difficulties. I'd venture to say in your area if it looks stock like a 350 gas in place of a 350 diesel, an inspector would be hard pressed to tell that it is not stock. If the VIN indicates diesel and there is no injection pump.... that might get spotted.
Octania is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 09:38 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
m371961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sistersville, WV
Posts: 2,163
Chrysler had displacement cast in engine blocks pre-1980.
m371961 is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 10:59 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Seff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by Oldsragger
sorry if bad explain.. norway is a **** country about car rules,
We still have you beat for ****-ness on that front. :P
Seff is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 11:50 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:19 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 11:52 AM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:19 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 11:54 AM
  #19  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The plate on the block is called a deck plate. It's used when boring a block to mimic the distortion that the block undergoes when the heads are torqued. If you don't use a deck plate (and most machine shops do not) the cylinders will be round in the unstressed state, but once you torque the heads into place, the bores will no longer be round, potentially causing ring sealing problems.
That's good info. Do you know why most machine shops don't do that? IMO a best practice would also create less returns and more satisfied customers/business reputation.

Correct me for my ignorance, but isn't the reason the heads get torqued in a pattern to avoid stressing the block in an abnormal pattern? I just find it hard to understand how torquing a head onto a heavy cast block will cause distortion.
Allan R is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 12:54 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Ranch Ca.
Posts: 7,714
Originally Posted by MDchanic
I didn't say that US companies NEVER indicated displacement, just that it wasn't generally done.

The Pinto motor, if I recall, was a creation of Ford Germany, and was used in European cars far more extensively than in American cars, so I would class it as a European engine that happened to be used on some American cars, and as such, it would have had its displacement indicated.

I would challenge you (okay, Joe, too) to come up with a traditional American engine (straight-6, V-6, or V-8) made before about 1980, that had a legally useful displacement indication (some 1980-ish engines, like the 307 and the 260, come to mind as those WITH an indication).

- Eric
1953 Hudson Hornet straight 6 with 308 cast in the aluminum head. Probably earlier and later years also of the same make....Tedd
Tedd Thompson is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 12:56 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Seff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by Oldsragger
Hehe is it strict in denmark too?
If you register a car as a classic/veteran vehicle, no changes can be made from original. Then the 2-year safety control is postponed to every 8th year. If you drive it like mine, non-veteran, then you can change parts - but never more than 20% increase in power without a new registration and documentation that the chassis, drivetrain and brakes can hold up to the added power. Vehicles newer than 85 (or whenever they started with TÜV certificates) can't be altered without a new TÜV certificate.

Last edited by Seff; January 12th, 2015 at 12:58 PM.
Seff is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 01:08 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:19 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 01:08 PM
  #23  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by Allan R
That's good info. Do you know why most machine shops don't do that? IMO a best practice would also create less returns and more satisfied customers/business reputation.

Correct me for my ignorance, but isn't the reason the heads get torqued in a pattern to avoid stressing the block in an abnormal pattern? I just find it hard to understand how torquing a head onto a heavy cast block will cause distortion.
Machine shops don't do it because 1) a unique head plate is required for each block family, 2) it takes time and thus adds labor cost to boring a block, and 3) not doing it is good enough for most stock engines. Any decent performance engine is bored using block plates and yes, the cylinder walls absolutely move when you torque the heads. We're talking a thousandth of an inch or so out of round, but when you are building a performance motor, that makes a difference on cylinder sealing effectiveness. Keep in mind that any piece of metal is a spring and deflects under load. The complex internal shapes inside a block make this deflection harder to predict. This is even more critical on WMW blocks like the 403 in the photo I posted.

Obviously, Chevy and Ford block plates are more common that those for less popular engine families. I managed to score a set of Olds plates from a seller on H.A.M.B. a few years ago.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 01:11 PM
  #24  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by Seff
If you register a car as a classic/veteran vehicle, no changes can be made from original. Then the 2-year safety control is postponed to every 8th year. If you drive it like mine, non-veteran, then you can change parts - but never more than 20% increase in power without a new registration and documentation that the chassis, drivetrain and brakes can hold up to the added power. Vehicles newer than 85 (or whenever they started with TÜV certificates) can't be altered without a new TÜV certificate.
That's actually a pretty reasonable position. I've seen some pretty scary modified cars here in the U.S. that I would rather not be allowed on the roads I drive on. People who put a 500 HP motor in a car and retain the stock 9.5" drum brakes all the way around, for example.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 03:09 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
oldspackrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,846
I believe some late '60s to early '70s Buicks had the CID on the intake or back of the block?? Don't remember which.
oldspackrat is online now  
Old January 12th, 2015, 03:25 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
m371961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sistersville, WV
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Machine shops don't do it because 1) a unique head plate is required for each block family, 2) it takes time and thus adds labor cost to boring a block, and 3) not doing it is good enough for most stock engines. Any decent performance engine is bored using block plates and yes, the cylinder walls absolutely move when you torque the heads. We're talking a thousandth of an inch or so out of round, but when you are building a performance motor, that makes a difference on cylinder sealing effectiveness. Keep in mind that any piece of metal is a spring and deflects under load. The complex internal shapes inside a block make this deflection harder to predict. This is even more critical on WMW blocks like the 403 in the photo I posted.

Obviously, Chevy and Ford block plates are more common that those for less popular engine families. I managed to score a set of Olds plates from a seller on H.A.M.B. a few years ago.
WMW= Windowed Main Webs ?
m371961 is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 03:36 PM
  #27  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
.......not doing it is good enough for most stock engines.
Likely then the engine build for most GM engines weren't special enough to warrant this.....maybe unless they were W30, W31 or W32 engines??
Allan R is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 05:33 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
Originally Posted by MDchanic
I would challenge you (okay, Joe, too) to come up with a traditional American engine (straight-6, V-6, or V-8) made before about 1980, that had a legally useful displacement indication (some 1980-ish engines, like the 307 and the 260, come to mind as those WITH an indication).
Heck, you don't even have to wait for the 403 to meet this challenge. The 1970 W-30 and W-31 had the displacement cast right on the intake manifold for all to see. Yeah, it's not the block, but what does that matter?
BlackGold is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 08:01 PM
  #29  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
You know better than to do that...
True, but it got you going...

And, actually, since I explicitly listed the contemporary 260 and 307, you can see that I would have mentioned the 403 as well, had it not fallen out of my brain.


Originally Posted by m371961
Chrysler had displacement cast in engine blocks pre-1980.
I did not know that. It would be interesting to see photos or read more specifics.


Originally Posted by Tedd Thompson
1953 Hudson Hornet straight 6 with 308 cast in the aluminum head. Probably earlier and later years also of the same make....
I did not know that either. Very interesting.


Originally Posted by oldspackrat
I believe some late '60s to early '70s Buicks had the CID on the intake or back of the block?? Don't remember which.
Really? Even though I owned a Skylark once, I never noticed that.
Any idea of the years and the exact locations?
All I've ever seen are the air cleaner plates with the torque numbers on them.


Originally Posted by BlackGold
The 1970 W-30 and W-31 had the displacement cast right on the intake manifold for all to see. Yeah, it's not the block, but what does that matter?
It matters in a legal sense.
In Europe, manufacturers are required to indicate the displacement on the part of the engine that contains the actual cylinders (ie: the engine block of a water cooled engine, or the cylinders of an air cooled engine), not a bolt-on part, so that the owner cannot fake an engine of a different displacement, because in many countries registrations fees are based on engine size, and there is a steep upward curve.

It's true, though - those intakes do say 455.

Thanks, so far, guys!

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 08:58 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
oldspackrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,846
Eric,
Here is one screen shot. The displacement is on the rear of the engine. Not sure what years it is applicable to though.
https://images.search.yahoo.com/imag...arch.yahoo.com
oldspackrat is online now  
Old January 12th, 2015, 09:53 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Seff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
That's actually a pretty reasonable position. I've seen some pretty scary modified cars here in the U.S. that I would rather not be allowed on the roads I drive on. People who put a 500 HP motor in a car and retain the stock 9.5" drum brakes all the way around, for example.
It makes all kinds of sense, but it's not much fun for car enthusiasts. Keeps the worst Bubba work off the streets and leaves the smart tuners and mostly stylers.

Still a major annoyance that I need to document the strength of my chassis if I want to swap a 380 into the car.
Seff is offline  
Old January 12th, 2015, 10:05 PM
  #32  
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,468
Honestly, I'm all for it. Grind it all off, and make new numbers with JB weld. What is an inspector going to do? Sit here on our website and learn all there is to know about our engines, or just google the number he sees? It's not like you're defacing a rare art piece in your situation. Keep their noses out of your business.
I'm sure pride in old American Iron, Isn't nearly as avid in your country as it is over here in the U.S. AND..... Even over here, that 4 door disco mobile of yours Doesn't get any respect from our homeland enthusiasts.
J-(Chicago) is offline  
Old January 13th, 2015, 01:54 AM
  #33  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldsragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 566
.

Last edited by Oldsragger; February 20th, 2016 at 03:20 PM.
Oldsragger is offline  
Old January 13th, 2015, 04:02 AM
  #34  
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
rustyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Margate, England
Posts: 2,513
Originally Posted by MDchanic
It matters in a legal sense.
In Europe, manufacturers are required to indicate the displacement on the part of the engine that contains the actual cylinders (ie: the engine block of a water cooled engine, or the cylinders of an air cooled engine), not a bolt-on part, so that the owner cannot fake an engine of a different displacement, because in many countries registrations fees are based on engine size, and there is a steep upward curve.
I'm by no means an expert in EU law, when did this come into force?. Just as in the USA, externally identical blocks may have a variety of displacements. Some internally identical blocks could be a number of displacements simply by changing the the crankshaft, rods, and pistons.

Modern cars mostly have engines that will outlast the rest of the car, and if the engine blows up it isn't worth fixing. As i said earlier, it's very hard to even see the engine on many modern cars, never mind determine the engines size.

Roger.
rustyroger is offline  
Old January 13th, 2015, 05:56 AM
  #35  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by oldspackrat
Eric,
Here is one screen shot. The displacement is on the rear of the engine. Not sure what years it is applicable to though.

Cool. Thanks! I'll remember that location.


Originally Posted by rustyroger
I'm by no means an expert in EU law, when did this come into force?
I'm not even kind of an expert in EU law, but I know what I've observed while living in Italy and while working on a variety of Italian and German vehicles over the years, and I know that in Italy, and in many other countries, at least in the past, automotive taxation was linked either directly to displacement, or indirectly to displacement (as in France) through a primitive horsepower formula, and that if you look at the block or cylinder casting of most of these engines, there will be a clear indication of displacement, such as a cast-in "9" at the base of motorcycle cylinders of 900cc engines. I was always under the impression that manufacturers were required to include some kind of clear, hard-to-change indication of displacement in order to make the jobs of the taxation departments easier, but I could be mistaken, and it could all just be voluntary and sporadic.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 13th, 2015, 06:59 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
m371961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sistersville, WV
Posts: 2,163
Eric, here is a 340 TA casting mark. All La series I have fooled with have similar marks. Not sure of A, B, or RB.
If you guys ever see a TA 340, the AAR people pay big bucks to save these.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
340ta.jpg (7.1 KB, 37 views)
m371961 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2015, 12:20 PM
  #37  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Originally Posted by BlackGold
Heck, you don't even have to wait for the 403 to meet this challenge. The 1970 W-30 and W-31 had the displacement cast right on the intake manifold for all to see. Yeah, it's not the block, but what does that matter?
Well, it matters because I can bolt one of those manifolds onto a 400, or a 307.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 14th, 2015, 02:22 AM
  #38  
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
rustyroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Margate, England
Posts: 2,513
The authorities might not know how to identify the engine size of your engine, but they surely would require the engine serial number to match the registration paperwork.

Roger.
rustyroger is offline  
Old January 14th, 2015, 03:56 AM
  #39  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by rustyroger
The authorities might not know how to identify the engine size of your engine, but they surely would require the engine serial number to match the registration paperwork.
Really? Is this common over there? Do they have a separate spot on your registration form for the engine number?
It's unheard of over here, as far as I know.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 14th, 2015, 02:03 PM
  #40  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Originally Posted by rustyroger
The authorities might not know how to identify the engine size of your engine, but they surely would require the engine serial number to match the registration paperwork.
Why? What on earth would they do if the engine had been replaced under warranty or been swapped out previously? Sorry but I don't hold any truth to your statement. The only thing that's absolutely required to match is the vehicles VIN to its title and insurance paperwork.
Allan R is offline  


Quick Reply: Thinking about to remove the engine number id's



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 PM.