Original octane requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 19th, 2018, 05:59 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Original octane requirement

Good morning Oldsmobilers!😀

As I have mentioned several times here on the board, my 72 Cutlass Supreme lived one of it's former lives as a drag car. I'm pretty sure work has been done to the engine, but what's been done, I'm not sure. It has 670 Holley Street Avenger with an Edelbrock Oldsmobile 455 intake, but beyond that remains a mystery to me. I was told by the previous owner that it will not run right on 87 octane unleaded. He recommended 93 premium, and I have been using only Exxon supreme, with no issues.

My question is that if it were stock (and the engine is numbers matching) would it run on 87 regular, or were the original octane ratings for this engine higher? I'm just asking to back up the claim that the engine isn't stock.

I haven't had it dyno'd yet...was gonna do that after I replace the exhaust, (right now there are some leaks and it's been bandaged and gooped) but now I'm thinking I may do it sooner so I can get a baseline and see what difference the new exhaust system will make.

Thanks,
Dave
72455 is online now  
Old August 19th, 2018, 09:44 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
The '72 Cutlass owner's manual says to use 91 or higher octane.


jaunty75 is offline  
Old August 19th, 2018, 03:17 PM
  #3  
Phantom Phixer
 
Charlie Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 4,668
Originally Posted by jaunty75
The '72 Cutlass owner's manual says to use 91 or higher octane.

Jaunty , the number quoted is a research number.
Modern gasoline is rated by the motor plus research divided by two method .
This would equate to about 87 octane in today's gas .

Last edited by Charlie Jones; August 19th, 2018 at 03:20 PM.
Charlie Jones is offline  
Old August 19th, 2018, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by Charlie Jones
Jaunty , the number quoted is a research number.
Modern gasoline is rated by the motor plus research divided by two .
This would equate to about 87 octane in today's gas .
Aha...so the previous owner told me that on 87 octane the engine sounded like it was coming apart...so if it runs like it should on 93, then it probably has had some work done ?
72455 is online now  
Old August 19th, 2018, 04:11 PM
  #5  
Phantom Phixer
 
Charlie Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 4,668
Originally Posted by 72455
Aha...so the previous owner told me that on 87 octane the engine sounded like it was coming apart...so if it runs like it should on 93, then it probably has had some work done ?
Yes , the compression has been increased .
Charlie Jones is offline  
Old August 20th, 2018, 06:37 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
brownbomber77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,467
That 670 is a little small....
brownbomber77 is offline  
Old August 20th, 2018, 10:55 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by brownbomber77
That 670 is a little small....
Hmmm ...the previous owner said the 750 that was on it was too much ...recommendations? I mean, it runs fine with the 670 and the plugs look good.
.
72455 is online now  
Old August 20th, 2018, 11:17 AM
  #8  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
The original carb on the 72 455 was a Quadrajet (7042251) and flowed 750 cfm.
You have stock GA heads IIRC, so in all honesty I don't know why you don't try running some lower octane to see if there's any noticeable performance or running issues.
Allan R is offline  
Old August 20th, 2018, 07:14 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by Allan R
The original carb on the 72 455 was a Quadrajet (7042251) and flowed 750 cfm.
You have stock GA heads IIRC, so in all honesty I don't know why you don't try running some lower octane to see if there's any noticeable performance or running issues.
If I try lower octane, what (if any) damage will happen? Also, how would I know if my carb was too small? Performance, acceleration, fuel mileage...and what else?
72455 is online now  
Old August 21st, 2018, 05:40 AM
  #10  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
If you try lower octane, start with mid grade and only use 1/2 tank or so. If the octane is too low you will notice pinging from the engine. Not dangerous, just a sign that you need to stick with higher octane, so go back to premium fuel. If you hear nothing and performance isn't affected, you can go down to regular fuel using the same process and see what happens.
Allan R is offline  
Old August 21st, 2018, 06:13 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by Allan R
If you try lower octane, start with mid grade and only use 1/2 tank or so. If the octane is too low you will notice pinging from the engine. Not dangerous, just a sign that you need to stick with higher octane, so go back to premium fuel. If you hear nothing and performance isn't affected, you can go down to regular fuel using the same process and see what happens.
Will do...but once this tank is empty I'm gonna drop the tank and look for my biuld sheet. Also, on the carb situation, how do I really know if the 670 is too small?
72455 is online now  
Old August 21st, 2018, 06:27 AM
  #12  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Under normal driving the 670 should be ok. But under heavy acceleration if the engine would likely not perform well and also likely an indicator you have too small a carb. The 670 would be a great carb on a 350 car, but in my opinion it's too small for that 455. There's a reason Olds installed a 7042251 (750 cfm) on your 455 straight out of the factory. I suspect the PO simply put on a smaller spare carb when he decided to sell the car and kept the performance carb that was on it for himself and another build.
Allan R is offline  
Old August 21st, 2018, 06:37 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,221
Originally Posted by Allan R
Under normal driving the 670 should be ok. But under heavy acceleration if the engine would likely not perform well and also likely an indicator you have too small a carb. The 670 would be a great carb on a 350 car, but in my opinion it's too small for that 455. There's a reason Olds installed a 7042251 (750 cfm) on your 455 straight out of the factory. I suspect the PO simply put on a smaller spare carb when he decided to sell the car and kept the performance carb that was on it for himself and another build.
He actually bought the 670 new, and he threw in the 750 as part of the deal when I bought the car. Since it seemed to run fine on the 670 and my plugs looked good, I figured I was good and sold the 750 to a buddy. Would it be worth the money, time and effort to go with a 750? I don't plan on winning any stop light wars...just enjoy cruising and right now I get around 10-12 mpg with the 670.
72455 is online now  
Old August 21st, 2018, 07:15 AM
  #14  
Just an Olds Guy
 
Allan R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
If your buddy still has the carb and wants to swap for the 670 I'd go that way. 10-12 isn't great mileage but it's acceptable. I think the 750 would do better.
Allan R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StarRacer
General Discussion
16
August 25th, 2019 06:06 AM
Christophe2m6
Small Blocks
14
November 19th, 2014 10:52 AM
archeryshooter
Racing and High Performance
26
October 16th, 2012 11:20 AM
russell-t
Small Blocks
10
September 2nd, 2012 07:10 AM
Junkman
General Discussion
7
August 8th, 2011 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: Original octane requirement



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.