Main Bearing Clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old December 15th, 2017, 08:40 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Main Bearing Clearance

One .0035
Two .0037
Three .0046
Four .0039
Five .0038

Rotating assembly is stock with main studs, ARP rod bolts, and .060 cast pistons. Max RPM 5,500.

Are these clearances appropriate?
VinMichael is offline  
Old December 15th, 2017, 12:38 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Was it align honed with studs etc?
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 15th, 2017, 12:41 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Was it align honed with studs etc?
yes it was align honed with the studs torqued to 110 with ARP lube.
VinMichael is offline  
Old December 15th, 2017, 02:50 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
So your variance is most likely in the crank then. However the rear main typically has almost a full .001 more clearance than the rest, apples to apples, because the rear shells are just a bit thinner. Hmmmm....
Either way it'll work, you'll just need to use a good 20W-50 oil for the film strength.

Hope this helps.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 15th, 2017, 02:59 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
GOSFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by VinMichael
One .0035
Two .0037
Three .0046
Four .0039
Five .0038

Rotating assembly is stock with main studs, ARP rod bolts, and .060 cast pistons. Max RPM 5,500.

Are these clearances appropriate?
Almost every one of those dimensions is at the high limit! This will affect your oil pressure while idling, not really that good!

There is a "cheap" fix but you'd need some accurate measuring tools!

Without accurately knowing all your numbers it appears when they did the align-hone they went well over the high limit! Just guessing here!

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. You don't say what size the crank is now but if it's "standard" you might try to get some .001" under mains, it will definitely help.
GOSFAST is offline  
Old December 15th, 2017, 03:29 PM
  #6  
Hookers under Hood
 
76olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,543
I have had to hone out many bushings for punches over the years and could hold within .0001 with ease over 4" if I tried.
Now having said that, I've never honed an engine block and wouldn't know how, but, I'm surprised an automotive honing machine can be .0011 out from the figures you posted.
Machining and holding .0011 I can see it, but honing I'm shocked.
I hope your build will be Ok.
Eric
76olds is offline  
Old December 15th, 2017, 03:47 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
The crank is .010 under. I’m measuring with an outside mic and a Mitutoyo .0001 dial bore gauge. The dial bore gauge isn’t digging into the bearings.
VinMichael is offline  
Old December 15th, 2017, 03:52 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by VinMichael
The crank is .010 under. I’m measuring with an outside mic and a Mitutoyo .0001 dial bore gauge. The dial bore gauge isn’t digging into the bearings.
It doesn’t take much to dig into the bearings.
Use the dial bore on the tunnel, then use a ball mike to mike the bearing shells. Then mike the crank and do the math from there.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 16th, 2017, 08:26 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,841
For your build, I'd prefer .0025, not over .003" measured in the vertical direction.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 12:30 PM
  #10  
Restorer
 
425HP409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Frisco Texas
Posts: 134
I personally like to use Plastigauge to check clearances, been doing it for over 50 years with no problems.
425HP409 is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 01:32 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dover, Ohio
Posts: 1,204
for an E-block 400 you are flirting with danger and asking for trouble with those loose clearances. 10-1 bet your crank grinder ground your crank to the "low side" just like he does for dem "Chebbies".Its my experience that if you do not instruct the crank grinder to put it right on the "nuts" - it will come back to you ground to the low side.

Actually i was being nice above --- the real truth is that that motor will NOT live with .0046 on the center main! None of them should be over .003. You will have low oil pressure and will soon lose a bearing. Im gonna assume that you will also find your rod bearing clearances way over .002 also. another ticket to disaster.
I only lost 8 of these motors until i became a believer in running stock factory bearing clearances! My current race motor carries 85psi cold and 60 psi hot and i do NOT use oil passage restictors either!!
Do what you want, but you asked for advice, and i volunteered mine. If it were me , i would get the crank taken to .020 (exact) - ( if it is .010 now?) and make it right. if it is already .020 -- get another crank unless you want to get the crank nitrided (tufftride).
MOO'
Tweed

Last edited by Chesrown 67 OAI; December 26th, 2017 at 01:34 PM.
Chesrown 67 OAI is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 04:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,004
I didn't think tufftriding was a building process, more of a surface hardening process. Does anyone chrome the cranks anymore ? A different crank might be better at this point.


Cutlassefi has the best approach to measuring. I precision ground dowel pin can work to measure the curved bearing shells if kept clean and straight in the bearing shell. Be sure to measure the dowel pin.
Ralph
OLDSter Ralph is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 05:13 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
Cutlassefi has the best approach to measuring. I precision ground dowel pin can work to measure the curved bearing shells if kept clean and straight in the bearing shell. Be sure to measure the dowel pin.
Ralph
Imo it’s the only way to do it. I’ve seen plastigage be off by almost a full .001 before and most dial bore gauges will dig into the bearing more than you think.The only clearance that concerns me is the thrust. .0046 seems excessive when compared to the rest.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 26th, 2017, 05:41 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,004
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Imo it’s the only way to do it. I’ve seen plastigage be off by almost a full .001 before and most dial bore gauges will dig into the bearing more than you think.The only clearance that concerns me is the thrust. .0046 seems excessive when compared to the rest.[/left]

I think your way is more time consuming, but also the most accurate. There is no way to know if the bearings are conforming to the bore in a perfectly round shape for measuring purposes.
Dial bore gages vary due to the "centering feet" and measuring probe diameter/radius and pressure. Bearings are soft and can be gouged. "Snap gauges" (telescoping gauges) are less accurate than a dial bore gauge.
As a general reference......... blonde and redhead hairs are generally .003", and brunettes are .004". Bearing clearance tolerances area lot less.
...........just my two cents worth on the topic.
OLDSter Ralph is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 08:12 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Main bores
1. 3.1886” 2. 3.1886” 3. 3.1890” 4. 3.1892” 5. 3.1892”

Main journals
1. 2.9883” 2. 2.9886” 3. 2.9885” 4. 2.9887” 5. 2.989”

Upper Main Bearings Shells
1. .0982” 2. .0984 3. 0983” 4. .0984” 5. .0977”

Lower Main Bearing Shells
1. .0985” 2. .0983” 3. .0982” 4. .0985” 5. .0978”

Clearance
1. .0036” 2. .0033” 3. .004” 4. .0036” 5. .0047”

Last edited by VinMichael; December 26th, 2017 at 09:53 PM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old December 26th, 2017, 08:18 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
I measured the main bores, ball miked the bearing shells, then miked the main jouranals.

I typo’d the #5 clearance in the OP by around .001. And it turns out the bore gauge may have been digging into the bearings after all.


Sorry, I didn’t mention, this is a 455. I forgot there are other varieties of BBOs

Last edited by VinMichael; December 26th, 2017 at 08:28 PM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old December 27th, 2017, 05:08 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by VinMichael
I measured the main bores, ball miked the bearing shells, then miked the main jouranals.

I typo’d the #5 clearance in the OP by around .001. And it turns out the bore gauge may have been digging into the bearings after all.


Sorry, I didn’t mention, this is a 455. I forgot there are other varieties of BBOs
Run it you’re fine. Just use a good 20W-50.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 21st, 2018, 01:42 PM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Happy Sunday. I got around to measuring my rod clearances. They seem to be on the tighter side.

Just wondering if this will work, or if I need to take some material off the backs of the shells to get closer to .002”

Thank you

1. Rod bore 2.6243” upper bearing .0668” lower .0666” Rod journal 2.4891” clearance .0018”

2. Rod bore 2.6245” upper bearing .0668” lower .0668” Rod journal 2.4891” clearance .0018”

3. Rod bore 2.6240” upper bearing .0666” lower .0667” Rod journal 2.4893” clearance .0015”

4. Rod bore 2.6240” upper bearing .0666” lower .0666” Rod journal 2.4893” clearance .0015”

5. Rod bore 2.6242” upper bearing .0667” lower .0667” Rod journal 2.4891” clearance .0017”

6. Rod bore 2.6243” upper bearing .0667” lower .0667” Rod journal 2.4891” clearance .0018”

7. Rod bore 2.6241” upper bearing .0666” lower .0666” Rod journal 2.4893” clearance .0016”

8. Rod bore 2.6244” upper bearing .0668” lower .0667” Rod journal 2.4893” clearance .0016”

Last edited by VinMichael; January 21st, 2018 at 01:44 PM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old January 21st, 2018, 02:05 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Rod bore should be 2.6245-2.625. Your rods are small. Open them up to the max and you’ll be fine.
And you NEVER touch the bearings for extra clearance.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 21st, 2018, 02:16 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Rod bore should be 2.6245-2.625. Your rods are small. Open them up to the max and you’ll be fine.
And you NEVER touch the bearings for extra clearance.
Thanks Mark. Easy fix. I appreciate it
VinMichael is offline  
Old January 21st, 2018, 03:09 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dover, Ohio
Posts: 1,204
Re-size your rods

Re-size your rods a bit larger.
Chesrown 67 OAI is offline  
Old January 21st, 2018, 06:41 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
Lets say I've got a main housing bore that should be finished honed to 2.937-2.938, I finish the bore to 2.9375 measured with a calibrated Sunnen dial bore gauge tenth reader, I measure the crank journal, then measure bearing housing bore and come up with .0025 clearance and I want .0027, I'am going to sand the back of the bearings halves to get to .0027. It seems the OP has a big variance in his housing bores.
VORTECPRO is offline  
Old March 24th, 2018, 12:06 PM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Circling back, I’m listing below the clearances I ended up with. My last question how to setup my M22F pump. OE or the purple spring? I’m going to run a small bead with a MIG welder on the pickup once the angle is determined. Oil pan is stock capacity. Non-Torandado pan

Running 20w-50

Mains
1. .0036” 2. .0033” 3. .004” 4. .0036” 5. .0047”
Rods
1. .0021” 2. .0022” 3. .0020” 4. .0020” 5. .0021” 6. .0021” 7. .0021” 8. .0021”
Rod side clearance
1-2. .015” 3-4. .013” 5-6. .009” 7-8. .009”
Thrust
.009”

Thanks as always for all of your opinions

Last edited by VinMichael; March 24th, 2018 at 12:28 PM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old March 24th, 2018, 12:11 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dover, Ohio
Posts: 1,204
Clearances

With those clearances you better run the stiff oil pump spring if you want to have a decent psi at warm idle
Chesrown 67 OAI is offline  
Old March 24th, 2018, 01:32 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Thrust is a little high but I’d open up the side clearance on 5-8. I always shoot for .014-.016.
jmo
cutlassefi is online now  
Old March 24th, 2018, 03:29 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
OK I will open up the side clearance on the tighter ones.


Is there anything I can do about the thrust?
VinMichael is offline  
Old March 24th, 2018, 04:05 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Firewalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 719
.008-.012 is what Bill recommends on steel rods in BBO
Firewalker is offline  
Old March 24th, 2018, 06:17 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by Firewalker
.008-.012 is what Bill recommends on steel rods in BBO
Well then, if Bill recommends that then it must be bible😉
cutlassefi is online now  
Old March 24th, 2018, 08:04 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Firewalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 719
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/real...t2325-s20.html

If you do go with what Trovato says in his book, be sure you also use his recommended rod side clearance. He runs loose bearing clearances and tight side clearances for a reason.
Firewalker is offline  
Old March 25th, 2018, 04:59 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by Firewalker
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/real...t2325-s20.html

If you do go with what Trovato says in his book, be sure you also use his recommended rod side clearance. He runs loose bearing clearances and tight side clearances for a reason.
Correct. But his reason for the tight side clearances is BECAUSE of his loose bearing clearances. HOWEVER it’s been proven inconsequential as there are lots of guys running top guided pistons with as much as .125 side clearance. I asked him about that and of course no response.
For the record some here have contended that I have it out for Bill, I don’t. But what I’ve said from the start is go to any track on any given weekend and you’ll see lots of guys making great power and being competitive. You dont NEED to be or follow Bill Travato to do that.

Last edited by cutlassefi; March 25th, 2018 at 05:06 AM.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old March 28th, 2018, 12:44 PM
  #31  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Retorqued the mains to spec and am now getting 7.5 - 8 thou of thrust. Thrust bearing seemed to grow a little after retorquing.

Cool, that’s a little better.
VinMichael is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Delmont 88 PA
Transmission
12
June 10th, 2016 03:29 PM
jensenracing77
Big Blocks
0
November 26th, 2013 12:54 PM
hawks70
Small Blocks
2
October 4th, 2012 07:12 AM
442 Guatemala
Big Blocks
0
March 28th, 2009 02:07 PM
macf85
Small Blocks
2
November 14th, 2008 09:10 PM



Quick Reply: Main Bearing Clearance



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 AM.