Factory Published Olds Head Chamber Volume Typically Correct?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 11th, 2020, 04:45 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Stock Olds Head Chamber Volume

EDITED VERSION

Are the chamber volume sizes that are usually quoted, typically correct, or do they normally measure larger or smaller? I know on Pontiac stuff, alot of the time, the chamber volume will actually measure larger than what is normally quoted, but I wasn't sure about Oldsmobile. The heads I have a 1969 "C" heads, and people usually quote them as being 80cc. They are currently at the machine shop, but I will measure them when I get them back to be sure, but in the meantime I was just wondering.

Last edited by Transam461; February 11th, 2020 at 09:04 PM.
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 05:10 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
1970greensupreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Haven CT
Posts: 246
ball park but remember, surfacing them will make chamber vol smaller, valve job could make them larger so better off checking them.
1970greensupreme is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 05:29 PM
  #3  
69 Ol' Blue
 
Doug Carner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 202
Originally Posted by 1970greensupreme
ball park but remember, surfacing them will make chamber vol smaller, valve job could make them larger so better off checking them.
ive heard they range from 80-82cc's. I just got my 69 442 C heads cc'd today and they are 80.
Doug Carner is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 06:28 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,243
Originally Posted by Transam461
Are the Factory Published Chamber Volume size typically correct, or can they vary larger or smaller? I know on Pontiac stuff, alot of the time, the chamber volume will be larger than what was published, but I wasn't sure about Oldsmobile. The heads I have a 1969 "C" heads, and they advertise them as being 80cc. They are currently at the machine shop, but I will measure them when I get them back to be sure, but in the meantime I was just wondering.
Published where ? Who is "they" ? 80 cc's sound about right for "as manufactured" and volume observed by others with original cylinder heads.
OLDSter Ralph is online now  
Old February 11th, 2020, 06:56 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,691
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
Published where ? Who is "they" ?
Exactly what my thoughts were. I have a set of G heads that measured in the 82-85cc range and "supposedly" they are 80cc as-cast.
Fun71 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 07:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
Published where ? Who is "they" ? 80 cc's sound about right for "as manufactured" and volume observed by others with original cylinder heads.
Just about everywhere, doing a quick search on google, most Olds websites list the 67-69 Oldsmobile "C" Head as having an 80cc Chamber, in FACTORY form. Thats what I was refering too...

Last edited by Transam461; February 11th, 2020 at 07:09 PM.
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 08:08 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,243
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
Published where ? Who is "they" ? 80 cc's sound about right for "as manufactured" and volume observed by others with original cylinder heads.
Originally Posted by Transam461
Just about everywhere, doing a quick search on google, most Olds websites list the 67-69 Oldsmobile "C" Head as having an 80cc Chamber, in FACTORY form. Thats what I was refering too...
#1. Your thread specifically says "Factory published". That says to me.......Oldsmobile factory/engineering. Googling "Olds websites" would be excluded.
#2. If you are using web sites as a standard, that would point to a measured "observation". Something posted on the internet isn't always accurate.
#3. What if I told you Oldsmobile published head volume spec's for (455) 1968, 1969 H/O and 1970 W-30 as being 69.75 cc's ? I can just about bet you none ever came from the factory with those numbers.
#4. The 80 cc's you are quoting is merely an observation of heads as manufactured. You only need to remove .005" from a 455 head to change the volume 1 cc.
I hope I helped clear things up.
OLDSter Ralph is online now  
Old February 11th, 2020, 08:26 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
#1. Your thread specifically says "Factory published". That says to me.......Oldsmobile factory/engineering. Googling "Olds websites" would be excluded.
#2. If you are using web sites as a standard, that would point to a measured "observation". Something posted on the internet isn't always accurate.
#3. What if I told you Oldsmobile published head volume spec's for (455) 1968, 1969 H/O and 1970 W-30 as being 69.75 cc's ? I can just about bet you none ever came from the factory with those numbers.
#4. The 80 cc's you are quoting is merely an observation of heads as manufactured. You only need to remove .005" from a 455 head to change the volume 1 cc.
I hope I helped clear things up.
No kidding, I know exactly how all of this stuff works. I guess I shouldn't have said "Factory Published". I was simply asking if the Oldsmobile heads were usually close to the normal 80cc that is "quoted" for the factory "C" head, or if they had a reputation of being either "Larger" or "Smaller" than what is normally "quoted". I am huge into Pontiacs, this is my first Olds, and the normal for Pontiacs, are most head chambers measure "Larger" than what is normally quoted, depending on which head is in question. I didn't realize I would start such a big stink over something so simple. The Olds crowd sure is a lot tougher than the Pontiac crowd Lol.

Last edited by Transam461; February 11th, 2020 at 08:28 PM.
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 09:02 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
I fixed the Title as well as the description, so that future people don't get confused. Thanks to everyone who has replied.
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 11th, 2020, 09:09 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,243
Originally Posted by Transam461
No kidding, I know exactly how all of this stuff works. I guess I shouldn't have said "Factory Published". I was simply asking if the Oldsmobile heads were usually close to the normal 80cc that is "quoted" for the factory "C" head, or if they had a reputation of being either "Larger" or "Smaller" than what is normally "quoted". I am huge into Pontiacs, this is my first Olds, and the normal for Pontiacs, are most head chambers measure "Larger" than what is normally quoted, depending on which head is in question. I didn't realize I would start such a big stink over something so simple. The Olds crowd sure is a lot tougher than the Pontiac crowd Lol.
I wasn't trying to be harsh. When people come here saying "I heard", "on another website", "on Facebook", etc. they are quoting things that may or may not be accurate. "Quoted" is an observation from someone. A valve job can increase volume as Fun71 pointed out and reduced if the heads are resurfaced (milled). How much variance are you talking about ?
I am sure Pontiac published head cc and other specs that varied from what is observed on parts people have.
OLDSter Ralph is online now  
Old February 11th, 2020, 09:25 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by OLDSter Ralph
I wasn't trying to be harsh. When people come here saying "I heard", "on another website", "on Facebook", etc. they are quoting things that may or may not be accurate. "Quoted" is an observation from someone. A valve job can increase volume as Fun71 pointed out and reduced if the heads are resurfaced (milled). How much variance are you talking about ?
I AM SURE PONTIAC PUBLISHED HEAD CC AND OTHER SPECS THAT VARIED FROM WHAT IS OBSERVED ON PARTS PEOPLE HAVE.
That's ok, it's all good. Emotion is undetectable on forums and text messaging, and sometimes people take things the wrong way, like I did above. Sorry about that. I do understand the valve job can gain a cc or two, and also the rule of losing 1 cc for every .005" of head milling is usually pretty accurate. The last sentence that you included above, is essentially why I ask this question, except I was asking if what Olds Published was accurate, compared to what people actually observed them at, in factory form of course, no milling, no valve job.
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2020, 06:26 AM
  #12  
Gary
 
VC455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Gillespie County Texas
Posts: 2,218
Originally Posted by Transam461
...I was asking if what Olds Published was accurate...
Heads generally have larger volume than published to make sure the compression ratio doesn't exceed rating AFTER the heads (and/or block) are milled during a rebuild. This is not just a Pontiac/Oldsmobile thing.

During the horsepower wars of the 1960s, people milled the heads severely to get to the factory volume in order to improve their quarter-mile times. During teardowns, NHRA checked chamber volume to ensure it wasn't below factory specs.
VC455 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2020, 06:31 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by VC455
Heads generally have larger volume than published to make sure the compression ratio doesn't exceed rating AFTER the heads (and/or block) are milled during a rebuild. This is not just a Pontiac/Oldsmobile thing.

During the horsepower wars of the 1960s, people milled the heads severely to get to the factory volume in order to improve their quarter-mile times. During teardowns, NHRA checked chamber volume to ensure it wasn't below factory specs.
Thank You
Transam461 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2020, 08:26 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,243
Originally Posted by VC455
Heads generally have larger volume than published to make sure the compression ratio doesn't exceed rating AFTER the heads (and/or block) are milled during a rebuild. This is not just a Pontiac/Oldsmobile thing.

During the horsepower wars of the 1960s, people milled the heads severely to get to the factory volume in order to improve their quarter-mile times. During teardowns, NHRA checked chamber volume to ensure it wasn't below factory specs.
Excellent information.
OLDSter Ralph is online now  
Old February 13th, 2020, 05:15 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,407
My D heads CC'd at 82cc even though Olds published the volume at 69.75.
83hurstguy is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2020, 07:25 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
64Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Union City Calif.94587
Posts: 2,384
pretty much all the heads i have dealt with , they all measured 84 to 85 CC's. Of course i did not do any "D" or "F" heads. But B's, C's, E's, G's and Ga head were all at least 84 CC's.
I just machined .025 off a set of "E"'s and they are now 80CC's
I'm sure there are exceptions, but that is what I have found.

Gene
64Rocket is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2020, 07:30 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by 64Rocket
pretty much all the heads i have dealt with , they all measured 84 to 85 CC's. Of course i did not do any "D" or "F" heads. But B's, C's, E's, G's and Ga head were all at least 84 CC's.
I just machined .025 off a set of "E"'s and they are now 80CC's
I'm sure there are exceptions, but that is what I have found.

Gene
Thanks. I just got my 1968 "C" heads back from the machine shop, and measured them with my CC kit. They previously had ".020" stamped in the deck of each head(before taking them to the machine shop). I had the machine shop do a valve job on them and resurface them to clean them up to make sure they were flat. I measured them and they now come in at 76.5 CC. I'm not sure how much the machine shop took off them, but I know it was just enough to clean them up, so not much.
Transam461 is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2020, 07:40 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,691
Originally Posted by Transam461
I measured them and they now come in at 76.5 CC.
I would be very happy with those numbers.
Fun71 is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2020, 07:45 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Transam461's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by Fun71
I would be very happy with those numbers.
Most definitely happy. They will have right at 10.0-1 on the 455 we are building with the 18cc Speed Pro piston, block Zero Decked, and the .039" Felpro gasket. The heads have mild pocket porting, and will be running the Erson TQ50 camshaft and matching Springs that I bought from Mark, so it should make some decent power on pump gas Im hoping
Transam461 is offline  
Old April 3rd, 2020, 02:15 AM
  #20  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,225
This comes up a lot. First, the chamber volume for mass produced heads will vary, typically by 2-4 cc, just due to manufacturing tolerances. Second, the numbers published in the NHRA blueprint specs are the minimum allowed chamber volumes for stock-class cars based on submitted manufacturer's design data. These numbers, which are the ones typically quoted in books and other resources, are not as-cast, and are definitely not what you would have seen had you pulled the heads from a brand new motor and checked them. These are the minimum volume you were allowed to mill the head to and still qualify as "stock". Olds heads as delivered were nearly always larger than the blueprint numbers. This was done intentionally - in a mass production environment you want to be sure that a part made at the extremes of the allowable tolerances would still function. Heads with larger than blueprint chambers would work just fine on a production car, but if the heads were too small, the engine would be subject to pinging and thus warranty repair work. Also, after half a century, you have no idea if one head that you have in your hands has ever been worked on. Has it been milled? Have the valves ever been cut? Unless you took delivery of that car from the factory, you don't know what was done to it. Any post-delivery engine work could have changed the chamber volumes somehow.
joe_padavano is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
73aussie455
Big Blocks
6
August 9th, 2019 04:40 PM
Raffi
General Discussion
27
August 18th, 2018 07:00 PM
330jetstar
Small Blocks
2
April 26th, 2017 06:41 AM
alex.1979
Small Blocks
5
July 5th, 2015 07:10 PM
f85 rocket
Racing and High Performance
4
November 21st, 2014 11:01 AM



Quick Reply: Factory Published Olds Head Chamber Volume Typically Correct?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 AM.