455 vs 425

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 28th, 2021, 10:55 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Gerald Nickels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,964
455 vs 425

I just bought a 425 I was looking for just a 455 block but didn't pass on a deal. The guy took it apart all part and was in great condition and put back in one piece. I know the Chevy 454 vs the 427 the 427 is the best and Pontiac a 455 vs a 428 the 428 will out run a 455. Even a olds 455 vs the 425 the 425 will out run a 455 Olds. All cams and intake and carbs being the same. What are the views on a 425 Olds motor ?
Gerald
PS
My brother runs a 425 parts in a 455 block for better cam selection never blows a engine.
Gerald Nickels is offline  
Old March 29th, 2021, 04:22 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,243
Originally Posted by Gerald Nickels
I just bought a 425 I was looking for just a 455 block but didn't pass on a deal. The guy took it apart all part and was in great condition and put back in one piece. I know the Chevy 454 vs the 427 the 427 is the best and Pontiac a 455 vs a 428 the 428 will out run a 455. Even a olds 455 vs the 425 the 425 will out run a 455 Olds. All cams and intake and carbs being the same. What are the views on a 425 Olds motor ?
Gerald
PS My brother runs a 425 parts in a 455 block for better cam selection never blows a engine.
1. I think the 455 block has the 39 degree lifter angle........the 425 can have 45 or 39 degree lifter angle. The 39 degree cams are much more available in any grind.
2. The 425 is a shorter stroke engine but same bore as.455. I would think the 425 will buzz up in RPM's well. The 455 longer stroke has more "swinging mass".
3 The 455 will have more torque.
......Just my two cents worth
OLDSter Ralph is online now  
Old March 29th, 2021, 05:16 AM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,226
Ralph has pretty much nailed it. All 425 cranks are forged. Nearly all 455 cranks are nodular cast. Piston compression height is different, along with rod length. 425 rods are 7.000", 455 rods are 6.700". Other than the lifter bank angle, they are pretty much the same. You can swap the reciprocating assembly from one into the other.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old March 29th, 2021, 10:20 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Ralph has pretty much nailed it. All 425 cranks are forged. Nearly all 455 cranks are nodular cast. Piston compression height is different, along with rod length. 425 rods are 7.000", 455 rods are 6.700". Other than the lifter bank angle, they are pretty much the same. You can swap the reciprocating assembly from one into the other.
Except you both omitted one thing, every 425 block I’ve ever seen had a shorter cylinder length than the 455. Not an issue unless you’re going to stroke it beyond the 455’s 4.25” stroke.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old March 29th, 2021, 10:23 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,226
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Except you both omitted one thing, every 425 block I’ve ever seen had a shorter cylinder length than the 455. Not an issue unless you’re going to stroke it beyond the 455’s 4.25” stroke.
Fair point, Mark. I was thinking of swapping OEM parts, not stroking it even further.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old March 29th, 2021, 11:24 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Fair point, Mark. I was thinking of swapping OEM parts, not stroking it even further.
Oh I know, but just in case anybody was. Cyl is about 3/8” shorter on the 425.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old March 29th, 2021, 10:45 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The Seasonally-Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 660
Heavy cars need the torque more than they need the higher RPM limit.

A longer-stroke engine can be faster/quicker than a shorter-stroke engine depending on weight, gearing, tire size, etc. The shorter-stroke engine is not automatically "better".
Schurkey is offline  
Old March 30th, 2021, 06:33 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,722
On my next Olds engine build I'd like to try a 425 myself.


" Heavy cars need the torque more than they need the higher RPM limit"

I think that depends on what the car is used for, and how the car is setup, An Oldsmobile is aways cylinder head limited, small bore, which demand small valves, combined with small cross sectional port area, IMO the shorter stroke could help, I'd like to find out.

Last edited by VORTECPRO; March 30th, 2021 at 06:40 AM.
VORTECPRO is offline  
Old March 30th, 2021, 04:31 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
IMO the shorter stroke could help, I'd like to find out.
Dude it ain’t rocket science(no pun intended), it’s simple physics. If you have limited induction capability as you mentioned, guess what, a smaller engine will spin higher because it’ll take longer to use up the available air. I’ve pointed that out on here a hundred times.
Example, 30 years ago when NASCAR started with restrictor plates, the teams immediately went from 358ci engines to 331’s in the hopes of keeping the revs up. NASCAR said no-no and made them go back to 358’s.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old March 31st, 2021, 05:13 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Gerald Nickels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,964
I my self and my Brother Ron Nickels race the 425 for years and like it better than a 455. I raced my 70 W-30 455 with a 73 Mopar 440 I out ran him till I reached the 1/4 on the street and ran out of engine then the 440 just keep passing me up after I was done in RPM's. Think out a 427 Chevy and 427 Ford and a 425 Olds don't you think they are better for racing than a 454 Chevy 460 Ford and a 455 Olds or Pontiac ? My Brother runs a .060 over bore 455 Olds block with 425 pistons rods and crank.
Gerald
Gerald Nickels is offline  
Old March 31st, 2021, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,722
Originally Posted by Gerald Nickels
I my self and my Brother Ron Nickels race the 425 for years and like it better than a 455. I raced my 70 W-30 455 with a 73 Mopar 440 I out ran him till I reached the 1/4 on the street and ran out of engine then the 440 just keep passing me up after I was done in RPM's. Think out a 427 Chevy and 427 Ford and a 425 Olds don't you think they are better for racing than a 454 Chevy 460 Ford and a 455 Olds or Pontiac ? My Brother runs a .060 over bore 455 Olds block with 425 pistons rods and crank.
Gerald

A 440 head is similar in flow to a Olds, but heres the difference, a 440 bore is bigger which allows bigger valves, advantage Mopar. A production 440 head worked over can flow around 290 CFM @ 28 inches, same with a production Olds head, but both have a small cross section. Now when you look at a BBC production head worked over now your looking @ 380 CFM, with a much bigger cross section, which will support bigger than 427 cubic inches. When I think about a 425 Olds with a production Olds head I can't see why it wouldn't run similar to a 400 SBC which would run hard with a 290 CFM head. My 71 Buick is a prefect test bed for a engine like that. Always looking for a virgin 425 core.
VORTECPRO is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2021, 09:46 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Mr Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 824
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Oh I know, but just in case anybody was. Cyl is about 3/8” shorter on the 425.
For my own clarification, you are referring to the "depth" of the cylinder wall into the crank area correct? Not the deck height..?
Mr Nick is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2021, 11:09 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by Mr Nick
For my own clarification, you are referring to the "depth" of the cylinder wall into the crank area correct? Not the deck height..?
Correct, all big blocks have the same deck height.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2021, 04:20 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
deadeyejedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: saratoga springs,n.y
Posts: 1,915
Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
A 440 head is similar in flow to a Olds, but heres the difference, a 440 bore is bigger which allows bigger valves, advantage Mopar. A production 440 head worked over can flow around 290 CFM @ 28 inches, same with a production Olds head, but both have a small cross section. Now when you look at a BBC production head worked over now your looking @ 380 CFM, with a much bigger cross section, which will support bigger than 427 cubic inches. When I think about a 425 Olds with a production Olds head I can't see why it wouldn't run similar to a 400 SBC which would run hard with a 290 CFM head. My 71 Buick is a prefect test bed for a engine like that. Always looking for a virgin 425 core.
since you mention chevy head flow .what is the peanut port head referring to?and what type of flow numbers would they give .this may be off topic here and i apologize ,but i know nothing about chevy heads
deadeyejedi is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2021, 05:42 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
VORTECPRO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,722
Originally Posted by deadeyejedi
since you mention chevy head flow .what is the peanut port head referring to?and what type of flow numbers would they give .this may be off topic here and i apologize ,but i know nothing about chevy heads

A BBC peanut port head is a 1974-1989 small port smog head used on trucks, typically they will flow in the 230 CFM @ 28 inches bone stock, many people talk very bad about this head and say never use this head. My ported street peanut port heads flow around 306 @ .550 lift @ 28 inches after porting with a 2.190 intake valve.





Last edited by VORTECPRO; April 2nd, 2021 at 05:45 PM.
VORTECPRO is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2021, 05:59 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
deadeyejedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: saratoga springs,n.y
Posts: 1,915
Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
A BBC peanut port head is a 1974-1989 small port smog head used on trucks, typically they will flow in the 230 CFM @ 28 inches bone stock, many people talk very bad about this head and say never use this head. My ported street peanut port heads flow around 306 @ .550 lift @ 28 inches after porting with a 2.190 intake valve.



Thank you for the info
deadeyejedi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldstoro66
Big Blocks
5
August 31st, 2017 08:28 PM
rcktdoc
Parts For Sale
0
February 29th, 2016 04:29 AM
angelica
Big Blocks
3
December 1st, 2012 05:31 PM
Bernhard
Big Blocks
2
November 11th, 2012 04:00 PM
BerBer5985
Parts Wanted
0
July 9th, 2009 03:58 PM



Quick Reply: 455 vs 425



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:21 AM.