Educate me on '68 442 Turnpike Cruiser
#1
Educate me on '68 442 Turnpike Cruiser
I have a lead on a 1968 442 convertible with the Turnpike Cruiser option. If my hazy memory serves me right, that was a 2bbl with highway gears. Anything else? Does it help or hurt the value?
As was told to me, the car is white with a black stripe (fender stripe?), and blue interior. Between the TC option and the color scheme, it could be a one-of-one car.
As was told to me, the car is white with a black stripe (fender stripe?), and blue interior. Between the TC option and the color scheme, it could be a one-of-one car.
#2
I don't know how many turnpike cruisers they made in '68 but there were certainly more than just a handful. They usually came with 2.56 gears. I'm pretty sure everything else was the same as a 4-bbl 4-4-2. Value is probably a bit short of a 4-bbl '68 4-4-2 but, it being a convertible helps keep the value up.
Nice color combination with the white/blue interior. What color is the top? If you pursue this further, make sure the stripe is in the correct location. Several people have added the fender stripe to non-stripe cars but they don't look right as the 4-4-2 numbers on the fender for non-stripe cars are located further forward and higher than the numbers for an original stripe car.
Randy C.
Nice color combination with the white/blue interior. What color is the top? If you pursue this further, make sure the stripe is in the correct location. Several people have added the fender stripe to non-stripe cars but they don't look right as the 4-4-2 numbers on the fender for non-stripe cars are located further forward and higher than the numbers for an original stripe car.
Randy C.
#4
#5
There are no records that tell us the different color combinations or how a car was ordered back in that day. About the earliest records of color variations and so forth start for the 1977 model year, as I recall. So there is no way of telling the rarity of this particular car, except that there were 5,142 4-4-2 convertibles, of which 170 had the W-30 option, built for the '68 model year. The rest (4,972) were the standard 4-4-2 model, either 4-bbl or turnpike cruiser.
Randy C.
Randy C.
#6
The Turnpike Cruiser option, L65, got the automatic transmission and the 290 hp, 2-bbl carb engine. Standard equipment on the 442 was the 350 hp, 4-bbl carb 400 with a 3-speed with Hurst shifter.
Given that the Turnpike Cruiser option got you a less-powerful engine with an automatic versus a more powerful engine with a 3-speed Hurst, I would have to guess that a car with this option would have a lower value than a '68 442 with standard equipment.
It looks like the Turnpike Cruiser was targeted to a bit older audience who wanted the look and handling of a 442 but in a car that was a little easier to drive, especially for the wife.
#7
So no gearing change? That's interesting because a recent article in Hemmings had this to say:
A lower 9:1 compression ratio allowed new 400 to run on regular fuel. Though the revisions produced less horsepower at 290 at 4,600 RPM, it not only retained 425-lb.ft. of torque, but it peaked an even lower 2,400 RPM. A 2.56 rear was used in the 4-4-2 and 2.56 or possibly the 2.78 was used in the Vista Cruiser—some factory literature lists one and some the other.
A lower 9:1 compression ratio allowed new 400 to run on regular fuel. Though the revisions produced less horsepower at 290 at 4,600 RPM, it not only retained 425-lb.ft. of torque, but it peaked an even lower 2,400 RPM. A 2.56 rear was used in the 4-4-2 and 2.56 or possibly the 2.78 was used in the Vista Cruiser—some factory literature lists one and some the other.
Last edited by Jon442; December 18th, 2017 at 09:03 PM.
#9
So no gearing change? That's interesting because a recent article in Hemmings had this to say:
A lower 9:1 compression ratio allowed new 400 to run on regular fuel. Though the revisions produced less horsepower at 290 at 4,600 RPM, it not only retained 425-lb.ft. of torque, but it peaked an even lower 2,400 RPM. A 2.56 rear was used in the 4-4-2 and 2.56 or possibly the 2.78 was used in the Vista Cruiser—some factory literature lists one and some the other.
A lower 9:1 compression ratio allowed new 400 to run on regular fuel. Though the revisions produced less horsepower at 290 at 4,600 RPM, it not only retained 425-lb.ft. of torque, but it peaked an even lower 2,400 RPM. A 2.56 rear was used in the 4-4-2 and 2.56 or possibly the 2.78 was used in the Vista Cruiser—some factory literature lists one and some the other.
I realize that the '68 was a different animal with its G-motor, but in a way the G-motor itself was the culmination of the philosophy first expressed in the release of the TC option -- long stroke for maximum torque combined with numerically low gearing to put the powerband in the sweet spot for high speed interstate cruising. Efficiency was the name of the game.
If you're interested in checking out the article, I'm pretty sure it can still be found on www.oldsmobility.com .
Last edited by BangScreech4-4-2; December 19th, 2017 at 01:29 AM.
#11
Below is the 442 page from the '68 Dealer Specs Book.
The Turnpike Cruiser option, L65, got the automatic transmission and the 290 hp, 2-bbl carb engine. Standard equipment on the 442 was the 350 hp, 4-bbl carb 400 with a 3-speed with Hurst shifter.
Given that the Turnpike Cruiser option got you a less-powerful engine with an automatic versus a more powerful engine with a 3-speed Hurst, I would have to guess that a car with this option would have a lower value than a '68 442 with standard equipment.
It looks like the Turnpike Cruiser was targeted to a bit older audience who wanted the look and handling of a 442 but in a car that was a little easier to drive, especially for the wife.
The Turnpike Cruiser option, L65, got the automatic transmission and the 290 hp, 2-bbl carb engine. Standard equipment on the 442 was the 350 hp, 4-bbl carb 400 with a 3-speed with Hurst shifter.
Given that the Turnpike Cruiser option got you a less-powerful engine with an automatic versus a more powerful engine with a 3-speed Hurst, I would have to guess that a car with this option would have a lower value than a '68 442 with standard equipment.
It looks like the Turnpike Cruiser was targeted to a bit older audience who wanted the look and handling of a 442 but in a car that was a little easier to drive, especially for the wife.
Very interesting. If I hadn't read the sheet, I never would have believed it. I would have thought the TC was only available on the Cutlass models.
You guys are the best, I learn something every day. Thanks
Ralph
#14
#15
From the powertrains pages of the 1968 SPECS booklet:
Standard axle for the Turnpike Cruiser option was 2.56. Optional ratios were 2.78 and 3.08 (2.73 and 3.07 for Canadian-built cars with the Chevy 12 bolt).
As for value, this is a classic example of how "rare" does not mean "valuable". Why would a car with significantly LESS performance than other 442s be worth MORE?
Standard axle for the Turnpike Cruiser option was 2.56. Optional ratios were 2.78 and 3.08 (2.73 and 3.07 for Canadian-built cars with the Chevy 12 bolt).
As for value, this is a classic example of how "rare" does not mean "valuable". Why would a car with significantly LESS performance than other 442s be worth MORE?
#16
Interesting it shows an L65 for both the Cutlass and the 442 but one is a 350 and the other 400 cubes.
I'm a huge fan of the muscle car era and I really love all the details on available options and combinations you could order back then before "packaged" cars.
I'm a huge fan of the muscle car era and I really love all the details on available options and combinations you could order back then before "packaged" cars.
#17
#18
I think it would have more cache if they marketed it as the 422.
#19
I agree. I think it’s cool they made them but wouldn’t want one. I would consider a 3-speed 442 though
#20
Turnpike Cruiser
It had a very large square air cleaner that pre heated the air before the engine could breathe it. Warm air vaporized the fuel for better atomization and thus fuel economy. This would also promote pinging but in '68 fuel was a lot better. The air cleaners are very difficult to find and expensive. Many car were converted to 4 bbls by subsequent owners
#21
It had a very large square air cleaner that pre heated the air before the engine could breathe it. Warm air vaporized the fuel for better atomization and thus fuel economy. This would also promote pinging but in '68 fuel was a lot better. The air cleaners are very difficult to find and expensive. Many car were converted to 4 bbls by subsequent owners
You're probably thinking of the 67 air cleaner used for California emissions.
#22
#23
Hemmings article
#24
Designed for turnpike
I read that this car was engineered for folks who did a lot of driving on turnpikes where speeds were higher and maintained for a longer distance. I suppose people who often found themselves travelling turnpikes (toll roads) liked it for the 442 label and performance...all while being fuel efficient. I just happened to find an old '68 TC with a Hurst paint job...cool look but had obviously been repainted...I'm going to change it to fender stripes. Truth be told... I would love to have been able to afford a '70 W-30...or a true 442 with a 455.
Last edited by Aztec; August 18th, 2018 at 04:46 PM.
#25
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Proper W36 stripe position
Incorrect W36 Stripe position - you can see the obvious difference
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post