'70 442 - Auto Trans Crossmember Insulators or not ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 9th, 2016, 07:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
35olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 402
'70 442 - Auto Trans Crossmember Insulators or not ??

I have a '70 442 W30 Auto and recently stripped down the chassis to restore it. The cross member for the auto trans was bolted directly to the side chassis rails (with no insulators).
I've since seen rubber insulators & brackets lists on various parts suppliers sites like The Parts Place (see photo attached), OPGI and others but I can't see anywhere in the Olds Parts Books or Assembly Manual that shows these.
Can anyone verify for me that these were actually original equipment (a photo would be fantastic).
Thanks so much.
Attached Images
35olds is offline  
Old October 9th, 2016, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
I have never seen any type in insulator on any of the cars I have worked on over the years. That's not to say they weren't there from the factory, but I have never seen them and I have had my hands on quite a few since I was 15 (46 now).

My guess would be that they were not used (at least on the 68 and up cars), but that is just an "educated guess" on my part.
svnt442 is offline  
Old October 9th, 2016, 08:57 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
35olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 402
Originally Posted by svnt442
I have never seen any type in insulator on any of the cars I have worked on over the years. That's not to say they weren't there from the factory, but I have never seen them and I have had my hands on quite a few since I was 15 (46 now).

My guess would be that they were not used (at least on the 68 and up cars), but that is just an "educated guess" on my part.
Thanks Randy. Thats what I'd suspected, particularly when they weren't shown in the parts book.
Cheers
Rohan
35olds is offline  
Old October 10th, 2016, 05:46 AM
  #4  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,525
None of the A body cars I have worked on have had these insulators installed. All xmembers were bolted directly to the frame. Not sure of the convertibles as I have never worked on one.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old October 10th, 2016, 06:28 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,268
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
None of the A body cars I have worked on have had these insulators installed. All xmembers were bolted directly to the frame. Not sure of the convertibles as I have never worked on one.
A-body Oldsmobiles never used isolators. Other brands did. Yet another case of a mis-informed vendor trying to make more money off of parts that aren't correct for an Olds. Kind of like the repro plastic cowl screens for Chevelles that everyone claims fit an Olds.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old October 10th, 2016, 01:18 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
35olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 402
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
A-body Oldsmobiles never used isolators. Other brands did. Yet another case of a mis-informed vendor trying to make more money off of parts that aren't correct for an Olds. Kind of like the repro plastic cowl screens for Chevelles that everyone claims fit an Olds.
Thanks Joe,
I thought that was probably the case when the parts book didn't show them.
Cheers
Rohan
35olds is offline  
Old November 1st, 2016, 06:48 PM
  #7  
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
70sgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 941
Just curious - what would be the harm in using them? I have a new repro pair left over from my prior '72 Skylark that I was planning to install on my '72 CS ragtop when the drivetrain goes back in.
70sgeek is offline  
Old November 1st, 2016, 06:57 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
If they weren't used from the factory, why would you add them?
svnt442 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2016, 08:18 PM
  #9  
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
70sgeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 941
Presumably for the same reason they were used in other A-bodies - to provide a little more road shock insulation for the crossmember. Unless they somehow change the crossmember/transmission mounting geometry in manner not shared with the other A-frames, I wouldn't see any downside for normal driving use.
70sgeek is offline  
Old November 1st, 2016, 08:22 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
66luvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ironton Ohio 45638
Posts: 863
FWIW, These were used on Buicks, and the rubber pieces are still available from GM, part number1385001. Do not know what years Buick used them but they were on a 67 Skylark I owned.
66luvr is offline  
Old November 1st, 2016, 08:30 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
For me it's just another point of failure. They were not installed from the factory and to my mind they are not necessary. You can do what you like of course, it's your car.
svnt442 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
442dale
Cutlass
0
April 15th, 2013 04:51 PM
KZ442
Parts Wanted
0
March 26th, 2011 06:36 AM
Big Blue 72
Suspension & Handling
11
March 11th, 2009 12:20 AM
esisson
General Discussion
2
December 8th, 2008 06:18 PM
Bill
Chassis/Body/Frame
0
February 11th, 2004 04:29 PM



Quick Reply: '70 442 - Auto Trans Crossmember Insulators or not ??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 AM.