Can one use a stock 350 piston pin height in a 3.50 stroker build?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 12th, 2013, 04:40 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Can one use a stock 350 piston pin height in a 3.50 stroker build?

Stroker 350 build?
I have seen a list of off the shelf pistons for chevys that others have posted that would work in a stroker build.
If you stroke a 350 crank to 3.50 in, that is .115 increase.
Can one still deck the block and not have the piston stick out past the deck.
If you do not deck the block will it still stick out past the deck?



Sorry for the noob questsions I have never built or looked into a stroker build.

Thanks
Bernhard
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 12th, 2013, 05:12 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
It is basic math. 1/2 the stroke + the rod length + the pin height must equal the deck. In the case of a SBO that is 9.330" So no, if you add stroke. By my calculations the piston sticks out .030 on a virgin deck.
captjim is offline  
Old January 12th, 2013, 06:40 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ihengineer76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 251
When you stroke a motor, you have two options. The first is to use shorter rods, or get a piston with a shorter pin height.
ihengineer76 is offline  
Old January 12th, 2013, 08:02 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
How many times are you going to ask the same question?
You have a distance between the deck and the main saddles. If you change the stroke, up or down, then something has to give. That will either be a change in piston height and/or rod length, ok?

Hope this helps.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old January 12th, 2013, 08:47 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by captjim
It is basic math. 1/2 the stroke + the rod length + the pin height must equal the deck. In the case of a SBO that is 9.330" So no, if you add stroke. By my calculations the piston sticks out .030 on a virgin deck.

This helps Thanks
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 12th, 2013, 11:09 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by captjim
It is basic math. 1/2 the stroke + the rod length + the pin height must equal the deck. In the case of a SBO that is 9.330" So no, if you add stroke. By my calculations the piston sticks out .030 on a virgin deck.

So the max stroke with a 350 olds piston would be 3.42 if the deck cleans up with a few thou and you would end up with 0 deck.

3.385 + .040 = 3.425

3.425 1/2 = 1.7125 + piston pin height 1.615 + 6 in rod = 9.32753

359 cu sbo with a .030 over bore



Hope I did the math right.


What does it take to clean up the deck on a good block?

Last edited by Bernhard; January 12th, 2013 at 11:48 PM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 09:57 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
ihengineer76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 251
Seems like a lot of work to get only 9 extra cubes. Boring it to 4.125 and using sbc 400 pistons gives you 362 and its is quite a bit easier and cheaper. Just my .02.
ihengineer76 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 10:04 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Bernhard
So the max stroke with a 350 olds piston would be 3.42 if the deck cleans up with a few thou and you would end up with 0 deck.

3.385 + .040 = 3.425

3.425 1/2 = 1.7125 + piston pin height 1.615 + 6 in rod = 9.32753

359 cu sbo with a .030 over bore



Hope I did the math right.


What does it take to clean up the deck on a good block?
The math looks OK, but is it worth all that for tiny bit of stroke? Also, align hone and decking with change the numbers.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:10 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by ihengineer76
Seems like a lot of work to get only 9 extra cubes. Boring it to 4.125 and using sbc 400 pistons gives you 362 and its is quite a bit easier and cheaper. Just my .02.

It is a lot of work for 9 cubes, now I understand why they did not stroke the HP TV build. It's not the piston cost I was looking at it was more the large over bore of .080 that I have my concerns over. I know others have gone that large with no problem. The cp pistons are only $638 and I think that is with rings? I would rather see them in a .060 or .040 over bore size. Could just be that I'm to conservative, I like to have another over bore left just incase. Also over heating and strength concerns over a .080 over bore on a street engine.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:30 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by captjim
The math looks OK, but is it worth all that for tiny bit of stroke? Also, align hone and decking with change the numbers.

Thanks for the reply Jim and education on engine stroker math.

I take it that you will have less 9.330 to play with after the align hone,I got the deck hight will change the numbers but did not think about the align hone.One would have to deck and align hone before max stroke with zero deck could be determined. As well as rod lenth and piston pin hight confirmed for +/- tolerance.What are the +/- tolerances one would find in a Crank stroke,China made after market rod, and quality piston? Would +/- tolerances be a concern?
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:30 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
We always left .010 deck clearance for future "just in cases".
380 Racer is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Bernhard
As well as rod lenth and piston pin hight confirmed for +/- tolerance.What are the +/- tolerances one would find in a Crank stroke,China made after market rod, and quality piston? Would +/- tolerances be a concern?
I don't understand that post. Also, there are no SBO aftermarket rods, so if you are using SBC stuff, that hasd been covered a gazillion times already. A thousanth or two is not going to matter. I'm with Nick, the less cut the better, saves you money, saves the block in case it needs done again. Have the piston down .010-.015 and use a .028 gasket.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 02:35 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,788
Originally Posted by captjim
I don't understand that post. Also, there are no SBO aftermarket rods, so if you are using SBC stuff, that hasd been covered a gazillion times already. A thousanth or two is not going to matter. I'm with Nick, the less cut the better, saves you money, saves the block in case it needs done again. Have the piston down .010-.015 and use a .028 gasket.

Thanks Nick and Jim for your replys.

I know there is no Olds small block rod on the market. What I was trying to say is do you know what one might expect in the +/- of a china made small block chevy rod,quality piston and a well ground crank.So that I could have a better understanding what role manufacturing tolerances would play in the final stroke.After Nicks specs as well as yours that it is good to be .010 to .015 down in the hole. I have finally got it that it is piontless to stroke a crank if you are using stock piston to pin height.That the small gain that one would get by stroking the crank and using stock piston should be left to the stock and supper stock or class specific racer.

Thanks again to all that have posted a reply
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 05:06 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
ihengineer76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 251
Originally Posted by Bernhard
It is a lot of work for 9 cubes, now I understand why they did not stroke the HP TV build. It's not the piston cost I was looking at it was more the large over bore of .080 that I have my concerns over. I know others have gone that large with no problem. The cp pistons are only $638 and I think that is with rings? I would rather see them in a .060 or .040 over bore size. Could just be that I'm to conservative, I like to have another over bore left just incase. Also over heating and strength concerns over a .080 over bore on a street engine.
It is a lot of material to take out of the block. I went that route only because I got a really good deal on a block and rotating ***'y that had already been set up for that. I did get the block sonic tested to check for core shift in the casting. It was just fine, but there is no room for another overbore. I haven't had any issues with overheating yet, though on a pretty stout build.
ihengineer76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bernhard
Small Blocks
5
January 12th, 2013 04:42 PM
Nunyadam Biz
General Discussion
7
December 3rd, 2012 09:25 AM
cutlassefi
Small Blocks
47
July 9th, 2012 09:34 PM
import extermination
Small Blocks
3
October 17th, 2011 07:16 PM
RAMBOW
Big Blocks
11
December 29th, 2010 01:06 PM



Quick Reply: Can one use a stock 350 piston pin height in a 3.50 stroker build?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:28 PM.