![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forums | Gallery | Encyclopedia | Tech | Olds Junction | Register | All Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars |
|
| Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile Forum! |
|
|
Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile forum, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Classic Oldsmobile Forum today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 37
|
71 cutlass intake
im thinking of adding a edelbrock performer rpm carb and manifold to my 350 which is stock except for headers. my only concern is the 4bbl carb might use to much gas. right now i have a stock 2bbl. has anyone done this this swap? about how much more gas did you use? i drive the car about 1.5hrs a day and dont want to be at the gas station every night.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
Register your account for free today or log in if already registered to remove this ad! |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 480
|
Use a quadrojet and your milage will be as good as the 2bbl as long as you don't put you foot in it. The Performer RPM is a better manifold but the way it sounds like you drive your car you might be as well off with a stock manifold or an Edelbrock Performer. They are about the same as far as performance but the Performer is lighter and you can find them on ebay pretty reasonable. If you are planning on future mods then the RPM is probably the way to go. That is just my 2 cents. Good luck.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 23
|
Right on! Either intake is good, as mentioned, if you plan future modifications the RPM is the way to go. Please do yourself a big favor though, run a Qjet, as opposed to the Edelbrock carb. For street drivability, fuel economy, and the kind of throttle response that makes ya grin, you will be much happier with a Properly set Rochester.
The Qjet is bullet proof when built by someone with experience. There are also some AC Delco replacement metering rod plunger springs to fine tune. If you need part #'s let me know, I have them written on the wall behind my carb bench,lol. Jeff |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 455 Intake | 1972_442 | Big Blocks | 4 | January 30th, 2008 10:44 AM |
| w-350 Intake or Edelbrock Intake | 71cuttyS | Small Blocks | 5 | October 31st, 2007 05:58 PM |
| 307 Intake | DonFrost | Small Blocks | 4 | December 23rd, 2006 07:57 PM |
| Need intake manifold | SMOKEYMTNKUSTOMS | Parts Wanted | 1 | October 12th, 2006 01:18 PM |
| Sealing Intake | blonzz | Big Blocks | 0 | September 3rd, 2004 11:11 PM |