ClassicOldsmobile.com Oldsmobile Enthusiast Community

Go Back   ClassicOldsmobile.com > Repair & Restoration > Engine & Transmission > Small Blocks
Forums Gallery Encyclopedia Tech Olds Junction Register All Albums FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Used Cars


Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile Forum!
Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile forum,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Classic Oldsmobile Forum today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 8th, 2009, 03:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Chumley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 217
350 motor mounts

I'm looking into replacing the motor mounts on my '72 (350) because I suspect the ones on there now are not correct, as the motor sits about 3/4" lower than it should. (Someone cut out the bottom of the fan shroud so the fan would clear.) Question#1: would the tranny mount be affected and have to be changed also? #2: Are the mounts just a direct bolt-in, and what is easiest way to go about this? Thanks, Chumley
Chumley is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Register your account for free today or log in if already registered to remove this ad!
Old February 8th, 2009, 03:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
74 Omega
Registered User
 
74 Omega's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 172
wasn't this covered?
http://classicoldsmobile.com/forums/...50-engine.html
__________________
Dave
1974 Olds Omega S (Who Cares about MPG)
1999 HD Road King Classic (50 MPG)
2001 Monte Carlo SS (25 MPG)
2004 Silverado 2500HD 4x4 Crew Cab (10.5 MPG)
2001 Oldsmobile Intrigue
www.sdcookman.com
74 Omega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2009, 05:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Chumley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 217
I guess I was looking for a more specific answer to these questions than the one I had posted previously. I just wondered if the geometry would be thrown off if I had the correct motor mounts but incorrect tranny mount. To tell you the truth, I can only assume that the existing mounts are incorrect since I have the fan clearance problem. Rather than try to find a smaller fan, I would rather make it "correct" than mickeymouse it any further. Chumley
Chumley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2009, 06:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
joe_padavano
Super Moderator
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumley View Post
I'm looking into replacing the motor mounts on my '72 (350) because I suspect the ones on there now are not correct, as the motor sits about 3/4" lower than it should. (Someone cut out the bottom of the fan shroud so the fan would clear.) Question#1: would the tranny mount be affected and have to be changed also? #2: Are the mounts just a direct bolt-in, and what is easiest way to go about this? Thanks, Chumley
I've heard this a lot, but if the engine were really 3/4" too low, the oil pan would be sitting on the crossmember. There's only about 3/4" of clearance normally. If you can fit a finger between the oil pan and the crossmember, the engine is at normal height. More likely, the trans crossmember is off somehow. My 70 W-30 had been improperly jacked by a previous owner under the open section of the frame rail. This caused the lower leg of the C-channel to be bent upwards, which in turn raised the trans crossmember, causing the nose of the engine to pitch downward. When aligned correctly, the fan should be centered in the shroud.
__________________
Joe Padavano

64 Jetstar 88 Conv
66 442 L-69 Conv
68 W-30
69 H/O
69 442
70 W-30
72 442
84 Custom Cruiser
86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2009, 01:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Chumley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 217
That makes total sense to me Joe, although I haven't crawled under there to check it out it would not surprise me if that is what happened on this car as well. If that's the case, could the cross member be bent back without compromising the strength of the metal? Would this explain why the driveshaft spline seems to stick out of the tailpiece on the tranny more than looks normal? (rear seal also leaks a bit, although this could be due to age of car) Chumley
Chumley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2009, 02:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
joe_padavano
Super Moderator
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumley View Post
That makes total sense to me Joe, although I haven't crawled under there to check it out it would not surprise me if that is what happened on this car as well. If that's the case, could the cross member be bent back without compromising the strength of the metal? Would this explain why the driveshaft spline seems to stick out of the tailpiece on the tranny more than looks normal? (rear seal also leaks a bit, although this could be due to age of car) Chumley
The frame and crossmember are mild steel, not heat treated, so they can be re-bent with no ill effects. Of course, this is easier said than done. I ended up using a very large adjustable wrench over the lower leg of the frame rail and a piece of pipe over the handle of the wrench.
__________________
Joe Padavano

64 Jetstar 88 Conv
66 442 L-69 Conv
68 W-30
69 H/O
69 442
70 W-30
72 442
84 Custom Cruiser
86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)

Last edited by joe_padavano; February 9th, 2009 at 02:44 PM.. Reason: Spelling
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9th, 2009, 03:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
Chumley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 217
Is there a difference in a '72 and '73 TH350 that might cause a proper fit problem? I'm assuming the tranny is a '73, possibly from the same car as the replacement engine. ( '73 Omega) My parts interchange book says a '73 TH350 will fit a '72 Cutlass, so now I'm confused. I crawled under there and doesn't look like anything is bent, although there seems to be space for the tranny to drop another 1"or so where the mount is. Looking at the tranny pan from the side, it looks to be higher off the ground toward the rear than in the front. (see picture) I got a number that was stamped on the tailpiece :6260036. There was another number toward the front I didn't get. The mounting pad seems fairly thick, maybe about 1" or so (rubber part) Is that about right? Maybe I'll just drive the car without the shroud until the weather warms up. Chumley
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TH350 pan.JPG (71.8 KB, 3 views)

Last edited by Chumley; February 11th, 2009 at 08:53 PM..
Chumley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solid Motor Mounts The_Jeremiah Chassis/Body/Frame 12 October 15th, 2008 08:09 AM
need rocket 350 motor case2273 Parts Wanted 0 June 14th, 2008 04:33 PM
engine mounts 303 350 swap tarps3 Small Blocks 3 December 23rd, 2007 03:10 PM
455 motor and 350 tranny seth garrison Big Blocks 3 July 9th, 2006 06:22 PM
Engine Mounts for 73 350 Steed93 Chassis/Body/Frame 4 June 16th, 2006 09:50 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Advertising - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Jobs
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
All content Copyright © 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63