1/2 Line, Regulator, and Electric Pump Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 19th, 2014, 07:30 AM
  #41  
Engine Builder
 
Smitty275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, ohio
Posts: 552
Just a few general comments. First off the fire wall is a terrible place for the regulator. Not only is it in the path of destruction for a blown fly wheel or flex plate it is a high heat area. Heat and fuel is a bad mix in a performance vehicle. You don't have to be on a drag strip for flex plate or flywheel to disintegrate.
As far as return line size it can be same size, or one size smaller for carburetor applications.
I've not encounter a pump yet that will not draw fuel 8-10" above the fuel level. Once they are primed the fuel in the lines before and after the pump keep it primed so the short lift is really no problem. So don't sweat it. It'll be fine.
Smitty275 is offline  
Old March 19th, 2014, 07:38 AM
  #42  
Engine Builder
 
Smitty275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, ohio
Posts: 552
I used braided fuel line and ran the lines on my car through the frame clear to the front of the cross member just like the factory did. Was a real PIA but it is well protected from damage and heat this way.I put the regulator on the inner fender because it was convenient and then to the carb from there. In the rear of the car I also fed the lines inside the frame rails up and over the rear end and brought them out a hole to go to the gas tank. Once again, it was a pia but it is procted from road debris and what ever else could hit it back there.
When I was doing all of this my car was actually intended to be a street and strip car.
Smitty275 is offline  
Old March 19th, 2014, 08:08 AM
  #43  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Very true and good point on the flexplate/flywheel, and believe NHRA rules state it needs to be protected. BUT, if you look at where the OE lines come out of the framerail from the front of the car, you will see it's exposed just as much if not more than being on the firewall. It's certainly further forward than the firewall, can see the hole on the frame in the first series of pics I posted.

If you really wanted to, you could use rock guard on the fuel lines in the same locations the factory did, rock guard is available from a number of sources, all the brake line repop places offer it.

True to about heat, there again though, if it's under the hood, it's going to heat soak regardless of where you put it, period. I have the same config on the LeMans, regulator on the firewall, and I've used an IR gun to read temps of the regulator, and it's less than the intake, that's for sure. The front fuel bowl gets hotter. And with a return system, it circulating helps keep it cool. (Yes, there is potential for heat soak of fuel in the tank, especially when it's low, but it's still better than deadhead.)

And finally true, on the return line sizes, same or one size smaller is acceptable. If you look at recommendations from the big manufacturers of fuel system hardware, that's their' stance. I should have commented on that when I commented on the pump feed line sizing, thanks for pointing that out.

One thing though, you should run as much hard line as possible, for a number of reasons. One, from a safety standpoint, braided line wears out much faster than hard line, and believe there's even replacement interval info in the NHRA book. Two is weight, that stuff weighs a ton more than aluminum line. It's harder to route, it's much larger in size. Then there's cost.

Everyone keep the comments coming, it's certainly becoming an informative thread!

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old March 19th, 2014, 08:57 AM
  #44  
Engine Builder
 
Smitty275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, ohio
Posts: 552
While braded may weigh a tad more it won't wear through from vibration like aluminum will. On a street car I'd be sure to put a lot of clamps on the line for just that reason.
On my '67 the front frame rails extend well behind the flywheel area. In the front the fuel line exited in front of the K member. I'm surprised that the later cars would be any different and expose the fuel line in that area. My '76 was the same way as the '67 in that respect.
Smitty275 is offline  
Old March 19th, 2014, 04:41 PM
  #45  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by Smitty275
While braded may weigh a tad more it won't wear through from vibration like aluminum will. On a street car I'd be sure to put a lot of clamps on the line for just that reason.
On my '67 the front frame rails extend well behind the flywheel area. In the front the fuel line exited in front of the K member. I'm surprised that the later cars would be any different and expose the fuel line in that area. My '76 was the same way as the '67 in that respect.
Yeah, braided won't wear through from vibration, but it would take a lot of vibration for aluminum to wear through. It is common practice to use aluminum fuel line, and I have street cars with more than 250k miles on them and have yet to wear through one.

For clamps, I used all the factory locations, do we think it's not enough? Think I should use more? I thought it was enough, but am asking since it's been brought up. I was thinking that you don't want the clamps tight on the lines, because as the chassis moves around, it will stress the lines. Am I wrong in thinking so? Now I'm curious.

The attached pic is of the frame rail, and the red circle is where the OE lines enter the frame rail to go forward to the OE mech pump. It's definitely forward of the firewall, and it is in line with the flexplate area. Certainly less would be exposed if it were in the OE location compared with where it's currently mounted, but this car will never see slicks, and never have a high stall converter, so risk for a flexplate explosion is low (I run an SFI in all my cars). At the track, most would run a blanket, and street or strip, I would hope all would run a blowproof for a manual car.

Another thing to keep in mind is if you run lines through the frame rail, it goes right by/next to the coil spring and pocket, so one would have to make sure to secure the lines away from that moving part.

Some braided line manufacturers recommend a 12-18 month replacement interval, and though many 'get away' with running it much longer than that, that's the manufacturer's recommendation, and believe that's what NHRA states, to follow the manufacturer's recommendation for service.

Some may have seen the article in Hot Rod magazine a few years ago:

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...ce_fuel_hoses/

Hard lines statements are to visually inspect and replace as needed.

Aeroquip AQP -08 AN stainless braided line weighs .19 lbs per foot. Aluminum line is a fraction of that. Whole reason they came out with Starlite hose.

.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
RailFeed01.jpg (158.0 KB, 36 views)
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old March 24th, 2014, 10:36 PM
  #46  
wait.... what....
 
oldzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London Ont Canada
Posts: 817
Well I pulled the bracket out of the car, cleaned it up and painted it. Hopefully you will be able to understand how i made it now.















oldzzy is offline  
Old March 25th, 2014, 05:11 AM
  #47  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
That looks great! Nice job!

Yeah, I'm going to have to figure out something, will do so after I get some other stuff done.

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2014, 12:07 PM
  #48  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
3 kinds of fuel pump safety switches, oil psi, tach signal, and inertia. The best ones to use are inertia, and pretty easy to wire. You can junk yard one off a newer car, or buy a new replacement one from an auto parts store.

(examples, can shop for better prices)

Summit Racing/Ford Inertia Switch:

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-890145/overview/

Pigtail connector for Inertia Switch:

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/pco-5756pt/overview/


Oil PSI:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/JEGS-Perform...e1cb88&vxp=mtr

Tach Signal:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/12v-Electric...ad630d&vxp=mtr


Oh, there's a roll over type switch too.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/prf-80160/overview/

.

Last edited by HWYSTR455; April 1st, 2014 at 11:52 AM.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2014, 03:19 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Can I ask what an inertia switch is and how it's used?
380 Racer is offline  
Old March 28th, 2014, 03:38 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
67 Cutlass Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 978
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
Can I ask what an inertia switch is and how it's used?
In the event of an accident the inertia switch woud be tripped and cuts off power to the fuel pump and ignition. This could save your life if you were knocked unconsious in the accident, and fuel was pumping out.
67 Cutlass Freak is offline  
Old March 28th, 2014, 03:52 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Ok.......ic
380 Racer is offline  
Old April 1st, 2014, 11:54 AM
  #52  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
I noticed the links on post #48 for ebay for some of the switches were no longer valid, so I posted links to the switches on Summit Racing. That includes the pigtail/connector for the switch, part numbers, and also a link to the Painless rollover switch.

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old April 18th, 2014, 08:44 AM
  #53  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Got the relay and fuse harness mounted, was a pita, had to run a wire up to the dash for switched power. Could have swore I had a spare wire run, guess I forgot!

.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
PumpRelay01.jpg (95.5 KB, 47 views)
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old April 18th, 2014, 11:33 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
"Keep in mind this is a street car which will be daily driven, and not a show or track car."

I have to ask. Is that a 9" or 10" converter? I have questions.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old April 19th, 2014, 06:45 AM
  #55  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
It's a 10" converter. It's a TCI Street Fighter with an anti-balloon plate, think the number is 242101. Upgraded from the TCI Break-away.

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old June 19th, 2014, 02:24 PM
  #56  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Update:

Well, as someone previously mentioned, there's an issue with the RobbMC pickup, where once you go below a 1/2 a tank, it will suck air. That in fact is the case, I experienced sucking air between 1/4-1/2 a tank. Was a pain on the power tour, having to stop every 160 miles or so and fill up. (4k RPM @ 80+ I got roughly 13mpg)

Before I went on the power tour, I called Tanks, Inc and ordered a fuel injection tank. I was hoping to have it installed before I went on the power tour, but, they seem to be popular, they were backordered by several weeks.

Also ordered a fuel sender and pickup assembly (non-EFI), and though they list the pickups as 3/8 line, they are in fact 1/2" inside diameter (@ .480 to be exact).

Later, if I want, I can go EFI, either port or throttle body, the car is ready for it, especially since I now have the O2 bung installed too. (was using an LM-1 wide band to dial the carb in.)

Today, tank finally came in, they have them in stock again, if any are interested. ($225). Got the sending unit adjusted and mounted, and the pickup & return assembly. Also had to do some brass fittings since the AN adapters were bottoming on the mounting plate before they tightened. Works for me, since the fittings are very close to where the existing fittings are, and the existing lines will mate right up without doctoring them. Nice.

Should have it in by end of day Saturday, will slowly fill and run it, check the sender and see how far down I can go without it sucking air, will report back. But just by the looks of things, problem solved.

(pics attached)

.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
prod_ssh_113_112.jpg (13.8 KB, 38 views)
File Type: jpg
prd_ssh_113_43.jpg (84.6 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg
prd_362.jpg (39.8 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg
TankLines01.jpg (49.2 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg
PGA-Pickup.jpg (67.7 KB, 33 views)
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old June 19th, 2014, 03:59 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
Stevec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southington,Connecticut
Posts: 970
I have the aeromotive version of that tank,it's awesome!
Stevec is offline  
Old June 20th, 2014, 06:33 AM
  #58  
Engine Builder
 
Smitty275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, ohio
Posts: 552
It's hard to see where I went into the frame with these pics but it is well before the converter/flexplate area. Definitely protected from the saw toothed ring gear.

IMG_20140620_090235_914_zpssqxy91g2.jpg
IMG_20140620_090343_074_zpslb5qfeoa.jpg

Here is where mine exits in the stock location. Very protected from any direct carnage. Would take an extremely major block failure to get to the fuel lines. But there is no saw toothed ring gear going to cut any of it in half. The balancer doesn't have a straight shot at it either.

IMG_20140620_085814_887_zps13nirwem.jpg
Smitty275 is offline  
Old June 20th, 2014, 07:56 AM
  #59  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455
Update:

Well, as someone previously mentioned, there's an issue with the RobbMC pickup, where once you go below a 1/2 a tank, it will suck air.
Hmmn......interesting. I have the RobbMc pickup in my '65 and routinely drag race it with 1/4-1/2 tank of fuel and have never had that issue.
chadman is offline  
Old June 20th, 2014, 08:13 AM
  #60  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Steve - Yeah, the aeromotive ones are nice, I was looking at those, and they've been out longer than the Tanks, Inc ones. A little pricey, but quality units.

Smitty275 - That works. That would pass tech too. I may actually redo mine, will have to go look at it again, see what my options are.

chadman - Yeah, you don't see it on your install? How far down can you go? If you go back and look at post #8, you will see the comparison between OE and the RobbMC pickups, and that's for the 68-72s. Maybe different years are better? Maybe it's got something to do with the return? Are you running an electric setup with a return?

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2014, 08:30 AM
  #61  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
I should close the loop on this and clarify some stuff.

Installed the new tank, pickup, etc, and am happy with all the parts. The tank is nice, and when testing the draw on the pickup etc I was able to get it down to about a gallon, I think a little less.

Test drive, went for a 3 hours cruise, and, towards the end, same issue, starved for fuel. Topped the tank off, hooked up the fuel psi gauge, and was like 3#. Left the gauge on it, drove for about 30 mins, was getting a lean out, pulled over, popped the hood, and the needle on the gauge fluttered a little at 0. Pump defective, and psi drops over time as it heats up.

Replaced the pump and went for a long drive, issues corrected. Left the gauge hooked up, drove it for hours until it was down to below a 1/4 tank, checked the psi and all is good.

One thing worth noting, the fuel sending unit Tanks have, you can't adjust the thing to where it will read the full range from E - F, and you have to source the sender from Classic Instruments directly, the one with the flat, oval float.

Also, use the cork gaskets, the rubber ones leak no matter what I did!

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2014, 09:06 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455

chadman - Yeah, you don't see it on your install? How far down can you go? If you go back and look at post #8, you will see the comparison between OE and the RobbMC pickups, and that's for the 68-72s. Maybe different years are better? Maybe it's got something to do with the return? Are you running an electric setup with a return?

.
I have never really gone below 1/4 tank so I can't say. That's just a rule I have always gone by that 1/4 tank is time to get fuel. I run a Robb Mc mechanical pump with no return line.
chadman is offline  
Old July 16th, 2014, 10:21 AM
  #63  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by chadman
I have never really gone below 1/4 tank so I can't say. That's just a rule I have always gone by that 1/4 tank is time to get fuel. I run a Robb Mc mechanical pump with no return line.
A lot of guys on the Pontiac forums run these pickups and say you should keep a 1/2 a tank in there so you don't suck air. You would know because your MPH would drop off, and/or at the end of the track it would nose over. May want to run a fuel PSI gauge and watch it once you get past 3/4 of the track. Just a suggestion.

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Old July 16th, 2014, 10:51 AM
  #64  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455
May want to run a fuel PSI gauge and watch it once you get past 3/4 of the track. Just a suggestion.
I used to have a fuel pressure gauge mounted on the cowl for awhile. No fuel pressure problems plus I run a wideband O2 gauge and it is steady the whole pass.
chadman is offline  
Old July 16th, 2014, 11:58 AM
  #65  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HWYSTR455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by chadman
I used to have a fuel pressure gauge mounted on the cowl for awhile. No fuel pressure problems plus I run a wideband O2 gauge and it is steady the whole pass.
Well, that about covers it! I will get more info on the folks who have had issues, see where the limit is. In general, I know they just say 1/2 tank is safe. Might have something to do with the year too. Great info, thanks!

.
HWYSTR455 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gearheads78
General Discussion
5
January 19th, 2014 07:23 PM
Nickthefish
Parts For Sale
0
January 27th, 2013 10:38 AM
1965cutlassragtop
Parts For Sale
0
July 15th, 2012 06:26 PM
davepnola
Chassis/Body/Frame
4
December 2nd, 2010 09:00 PM



Quick Reply: 1/2 Line, Regulator, and Electric Pump Install



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:43 PM.