69 442 race car build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 30th, 2014, 04:41 AM
  #81  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Got a little more done. Had to get it back on the ground so I could roll it out of the shop. Getting ready to insulate and heat the shop so I can keep working on it through the winter. We are planning to start the body work in December.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_203336_447.jpg (78.4 KB, 200 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_203359_383.jpg (67.4 KB, 183 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_203419_721.jpg (57.4 KB, 175 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_204003_899.jpg (76.3 KB, 188 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_204706_363.jpg (62.4 KB, 204 views)
chadman is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 04:45 AM
  #82  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
A few more pics. I think I'm going to remake the quick release steering wheel extension. Functionaly it's perfectly fine I just don't like how spindly it looks with the 3/4' tubing. Probably going to use 1-1/2" to make it look a bit beefier.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_203230_440.jpg (54.1 KB, 171 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141029_203442_280.jpg (70.5 KB, 179 views)
chadman is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 08:16 AM
  #83  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,946
its looking good, i need to get back to work on my race car. are those bars to keep the engine from moving fore and aft?
young olds is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 08:27 AM
  #84  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
The car looks awesome. I always seem to appreciate the in progress pictures more than then finished product lol. But I can't wait to see pictures of it when its done.
coppercutlass is online now  
Old October 30th, 2014, 08:43 AM
  #85  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by young olds
are those bars to keep the engine from moving fore and aft?
Yes. Their is one on the drivers side too but it's hidden by the header in the pics. I am using a front and mid plate and no motor mounts. The plates are very good at resisting side to side or twisting motion. Not so good at preventing fore and aft movement. I also took the opportuninty to change the installed angle of the engine in the chassis. From the factory the engine sits at a 4 degree angle in relation to the frame. I changed it to 2.5 degrees.
chadman is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 09:05 AM
  #86  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,946
any reason behind that? im still at the point where i can change the angle but i was just going to put my carb pad at the same angle as my rockers.
young olds is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 10:31 AM
  #87  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
I wanted the car to sit low with a 30" tall rear tire. In order to achieve that you need to tuck the rearend up into the car quite a bit. This raises the pinion at the same time which makes the universal joint angle more extreme. By tipping the engine up in the rear it lessens the angle at the front universal joint. In an ideal world I would have tipped it up even more and pointed it directly at the pinion but unless I wanted raise the trans tunnel and have custom headers made this was the practical limit. Basically the car is as low as I can get it without raising the driveshaft tunnel and still have room for suspension movement. I may be able to drop it a tad more but not much.
chadman is offline  
Old October 30th, 2014, 01:20 PM
  #88  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,946
Ok I see.
young olds is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 06:47 AM
  #89  
Registered User
 
gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Utah
Posts: 400
Nice work Chad, digging the project, I'm currently doing something similar with my '70.


Maybe I missed it but, What steering column are you using? Right now I'm leaning towards the Chassisworks 2"column, kind of pricy though.
gear head is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 07:01 AM
  #90  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
The column is a TRZ and the quick release is by Strange. I did remake the firewall plate for the column. TRZ puts the location where the column passes through the firewall lower than stock for a set back driver position. I wanted the column in the stock location so I made a new plate so the column would pass through in the stock location.
chadman is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 08:38 AM
  #91  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
The Driveshaft Shop has been making driveshafts with CV joints now at the front so you don't have to worry about setting canceling u-joint angles on lowered cars. Most newer RWD GM products are using them. I fought that driveline angle battle for a while on my '83 with .

Not cheap, but it's an option on lowered cars... a friend just got one for his 600 hp LS7 powered A-body.

Bad *** work so far, I like seeing the updates.
83hurstguy is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 09:54 AM
  #92  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Chad
The car is looking awesome
I like how you are getting the rear of the car down and having it sit as low as it can with a large tire.
Car would look good as a H/O and have that wow factor, but as a 442 it will be clean.
Very nice build

Last edited by Bernhard; October 31st, 2014 at 09:58 AM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 10:11 AM
  #93  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
It's funny you mentioned that. When I put it back on the ground I hung that fender on there just to see what the stance was. That was the first time even the slightest thought of doing the H/O paint scheme crossed my mind. It would look pretty cool as an H/O but one thing that really prevents me from doing that is the deck lid wing. I don't know of any other way to say it besides I REALLY HATE THEM! LOL! and I really don't think the H/O scheme would look right without it.
chadman is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 10:13 AM
  #94  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
I'm actually surprised noone has mentioned the front spring cups. I figured that would be the first question after the new pics.
chadman is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 11:29 AM
  #95  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Originally Posted by chadman
It's funny you mentioned that. When I put it back on the ground I hung that fender on there just to see what the stance was. That was the first time even the slightest thought of doing the H/O paint scheme crossed my mind. It would look pretty cool as an H/O but one thing that really prevents me from doing that is the deck lid wing. I don't know of any other way to say it b esides I REALLY HATE THEM! LOL! and I really don't think the H/O scheme would look right without it.


The H/O with the rare rear wing delete.
I'm with you on the wing I'm not a fan it takes away from the clean line.
Car would have a wow factor as a H/O
Car would be cleaner as a 442
Wings and Vinyl roofs take away from the clean flowing lines of the 69.
What color are you thinking of if you go 442?
You could have two deck lids one with spoiler one with out.

The engine limiters,upper spring pockets, steering shaft,engine plate all look nice.
I know it is a race car but I think you are right if you can give the steering column/wheel mount more of a factory die mention it would look better.
If you go the 442 route and want a factory race car look there are new reproduction dash heater and radio delete plates that will soon be on the market for the 69.

Last edited by Bernhard; October 31st, 2014 at 11:48 AM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 11:38 AM
  #96  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by Bernhard
What color are you thinking of if you go 442?
This is what I'm thinking.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
69Olds-442-silv-LR.jpg (81.7 KB, 158 views)
chadman is offline  
Old October 31st, 2014, 04:05 PM
  #97  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Platinum silver or silver looks very sharp.

Vinyl roofs you ether love them or hate them.
My friends 69 cutlass S has the vinyl roof he likes it because it breaks up the body line. I used to be in the vinyl roof camp but these days I lean toward the cleaner look of vinyl free roof.

What ever you pick it will be killer
Bernhard is offline  
Old November 4th, 2014, 10:51 AM
  #98  
Registered User
 
69455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DesPlaines IL
Posts: 317
steet / strip

Detroit Speed kit 3
drop spindle
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
2013-01-05 14.56.35.jpg (79.4 KB, 133 views)
File Type: jpg
2013-01-05 15.00.24.jpg (81.0 KB, 142 views)
69455 is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 06:21 AM
  #99  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
OK, I took a break from working on the car for a bit to finish prepping the shop for the body work. Got the insulation done, OSB up on the walls and new compressor wired and black pipe air lines run. Now it's back on the car.


I took the body off of the frame to final weld everything that wasn't accessible with the body in the way. I should have that finished up this week. Then the frame will be powder coated satin black. I will soon have the shell media blasted and hope to start on the body work mid February (per the body guy who is helping me).


BTW, the shock cross member in the pics is just temporary. The actual cross member will be in the trunk as part of the cage and the shocks will come through the trunk floor. This will make for easy shock adjustments without crawling under the car.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_20150124_133307_526.jpg (63.2 KB, 164 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20150124_133204_871.jpg (68.3 KB, 151 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20150124_133132_043.jpg (71.3 KB, 149 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141103_113625_591.jpg (121.3 KB, 150 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_20141103_111911_891.jpg (113.5 KB, 150 views)

Last edited by chadman; January 26th, 2015 at 07:12 AM.
chadman is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 07:08 AM
  #100  
Registered User
 
dc2x4drvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,659
Nice work..
dc2x4drvr is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 08:24 AM
  #101  
Registered User
 
DENT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tillsonburg Ont. Canada.
Posts: 978
Very nice.
DENT is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 08:55 AM
  #102  
11.52 @116
 
jims2000lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 475
Car is coming along nicely.
I have a suggestion for your paint scheme. Vynil top trim but no vynil. Then you can paint the roof a contrasting color.

I painted my car in 01 and would like to again a a year or so to fix the chips and dings from use. It originally had a vynil top but it along with the trim was gone when I bought it. I welded the holes up.
A few years agon I got the trim and installed it cuz I like the stainless trim alot.
I eventually plan to put the wheel well trim back on and possibly a stock 442 hood.
Ive had the car since 97 so i go through phases. Im in the phase now where I want to run 10s and I want to be less racey doing so.

The no vynil paint scheme I suggested gives you slot of options.

Also, I cant get into those wings either. Ive had a few people tell me to add it to mine. No thanks.
jims2000lt is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 09:03 AM
  #103  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Actually as you have suggested I think we may try the two tone paint at first. That was suggested by the body guy as well. His point was that if I didn't like it I could just put a vinyl top over the painted roof and end up with the same result so it would really be a no loss experiment.
chadman is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 09:27 AM
  #104  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
Nice work Chad... chassis looks bad ***. Looks like you already made your mind up on the silver, which is sharp. I think it would still look awesome with the H/O paint scheme and no wing... the '68s used the same scheme with different colors and no wing, though the whole decklid was black.
83hurstguy is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 10:27 AM
  #105  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Nice work Chad

In my opinion single color with black hood stripes time less.
I used to be in the vinyl roof camp but have had a change heart.
If you go single color and you don't like it you can always go with the vinyl roof.
The down side of doing the roof after is drilling in to fresh paint and sealing the holes so no rust starts from the stud screws or pop rivets used to hold the chrome trim on.
I always felt the to-tone painted roof, on a muscle car never looked right just my opinion.

Good luck with the rest of the build

Last edited by Bernhard; January 26th, 2015 at 10:36 AM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 11:22 AM
  #106  
11.52 @116
 
jims2000lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 475
What are you planning for the hood Chad?
jims2000lt is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 11:48 AM
  #107  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by jims2000lt
What are you planning for the hood Chad?

I need to clear a Victor intake with a Dominator on top of it and I'm not a fan of the raised W-25 style hoods so something like this:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
photo 1-1.JPG (142.6 KB, 118 views)
File Type: jpg
photo 2-1.JPG (166.7 KB, 122 views)

Last edited by chadman; January 26th, 2015 at 11:51 AM.
chadman is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 02:23 PM
  #108  
11.52 @116
 
jims2000lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 475
Originally Posted by chadman
I need to clear a Victor intake with a Dominator on top of it and I'm not a fan of the raised W-25 style hoods so something like this:
That will look good. Better suited on a 442 than H/O.
I had a repo w25 hood for year but hated that i couldnt fit an air cleaner so i so it and built up a repo h/o scoop to 4 inches high on my steel 69 hood. it fits better and after all the welding ns lightening it weighs less than the repo w25 hood. Wanted that height incase I someday go to a victor. 7551 with 1" spacer and 5" k&n on a drop base for now. I still have room so it worked out well.
jims2000lt is offline  
Old January 26th, 2015, 03:53 PM
  #109  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Originally Posted by chadman
I need to clear a Victor intake with a Dominator on top of it and I'm not a fan of the raised W-25 style hoods so something like this:


This will be the biggest challenge in my opinion non factory hoods are a looks/line killer.
There are very few cars that look better with a after market hood.
The large W25 hood looks like its on cocaine.


Can you make the H/O hood work if you lower the engine?
Is this a max effort function before looks or is there room to alter the intake such as milling the intake carb pad?

Last edited by Bernhard; January 26th, 2015 at 04:10 PM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 04:21 AM
  #110  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by Bernhard

Can you make the H/O hood work if you lower the engine?
Is this a max effort function before looks or is there room to alter the intake such as milling the intake carb pad?


I can't really lower the engine anymore than it is for a few reasons. One being that with the car being low the oil pan is already too damn close to the ground as it is. Secondly that would require me to get custom headers made and I'd like to avoid that. Not only that but I prefer the cowl induction look over the H/O scoop myself.
chadman is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 05:33 AM
  #111  
Registered User
 
Milan..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 46
Stance looks great Chad , a cowl is fine , the "Nostril Hood" does not work for me..... same goes for the "Wing"....
Milan.. is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 06:34 AM
  #112  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Thanks Milan. I think you and I have similar taste in how we like to see cars done.
chadman is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 08:26 AM
  #113  
Registered User
 
69455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DesPlaines IL
Posts: 317
Nothing says CHEVY more than a cowl hood.


We all need to get it under the hood
Every one has an opinion


Snort
69455 is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 08:35 AM
  #114  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Well it may have a "Chevy hood" but it will not have a Chevy under the hood!
chadman is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 08:52 AM
  #115  
Registered User
 
69455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DesPlaines IL
Posts: 317
Looking foreword to see completed project and time slips.


All in good fun as I take a shot of cocaine and away I run.
69455 is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 09:01 AM
  #116  
Registered User
 
olds3442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,265
Chad,great to see car is making progress, I will vote for cowl hood and no wing also
olds3442 is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 09:10 AM
  #117  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Originally Posted by chadman
I can't really lower the engine anymore than it is for a few reasons. One being that with the car being low the oil pan is already too damn close to the ground as it is. Secondly that would require me to get custom headers made and I'd like to avoid that. Not only that but I prefer the cowl induction look over the H/O scoop myself.
Thanks for the reply Chad
I was not a big fan of the H/O hood but it grows on you I have found.
I agree no wing, the wing kills the lines/flow of the car.
Milan's stage 2 hood scoup works.
Will you be going glass hood, or steel hood?
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 09:25 AM
  #118  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by Bernhard
Will you be going glass hood, or steel hood?

It will be glass. Basically my body guy and I will try to make an exact copy of the hood I posted pictures of above which as you will notice does not have the double bulge at the front as all of the cowl hoods available off the shelf do.
chadman is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 09:34 AM
  #119  
11.52 @116
 
jims2000lt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cedar Lake IN
Posts: 475
That will look really good. I'm a fan off just about all scoops except forward facing pro stock style scoops. Unless its a 6 second pro stock.
jims2000lt is offline  
Old January 27th, 2015, 05:32 PM
  #120  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,790
Hi Chad
I agree
The cutlass supreme style hood lends itself better to a hood scoup or cowl style hood.
The H/O scoup is the only one that I have seen that works with the double bump hood.

Good Luck look forward to progress reports.
Bernhard is offline  


Quick Reply: 69 442 race car build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 PM.