General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

1970 455 Alternator

Old February 1st, 2011, 11:28 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tucsonbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 130
1970 455 Alternator

What is the proper number that should be on a 1970 455 Alternator?
Tucsonbob is offline  
Old February 1st, 2011, 09:50 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
You need to be a bit more specific. What car? Does it have A/C? If it's a 442 it's internally regualted. All others are externally regualted.
svnt442 is offline  
Old February 1st, 2011, 10:16 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
Originally Posted by svnt442
Does it have A/C? If it's a 442 it's internally regualted.
If so its a 1100890, hard to find! and expensive
stevengerard is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 06:09 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tucsonbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 130
It is a 442 with no a/c.
Tucsonbob is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 03:59 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
bobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 307
Tucson,

I'm waiting to hear the answer to this one too. I'm assuing a 70 W30 without AC would use the same alternator as a 442 with no AC.

regards,
bob
bobb is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 04:19 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
bobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 307
Tucson,

I did some digging on this site and came up with the following part numbers for 70 442 applications, both are internally regulated, which is why they are unique to 442s only:

1100880 - 37 amp - used w/o AC, rear defogger, or HD alternator
1100890 - 55 amp - used with AC, Rear Defog, or HD alternator

regards,
bob
bobb is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 07:05 PM
  #7  
Lance
 
ROCKET VAPOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUKON, OK.
Posts: 738
Originally Posted by stevengerard
If so its a 1100890, hard to find! and expensive
Steven, what is the current $$$ range on a 1100890 alt.???
ROCKET VAPOR is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 07:39 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tucsonbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 130
Mine is 1100662 with an internal regulator.
Tucsonbob is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 07:47 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,127
Do you have a camera?? If so, post pics of the front and back of your alternator.
70Post is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 07:57 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tucsonbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 130
I'll get photos tomorrow. Too cold tonight. Very cold for Tucson standards, down near 20 tonight and no higher than 37 in the day. Snowbirds are not liking this although I did see a few with shorts on today.
Tucsonbob is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 09:26 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
Originally Posted by ROCKET VAPOR
Steven, what is the current $$$ range on a 1100890 alt.???

You know how that goes, I have heard of folks paying close to 2k for a rebuilt one for that final detail piece of the numbers matching resto, but really I have typically seen them from $400 - $1,200. Its a big range but typically the lower range is for ones with the wrong back or not stamped. The high end is for date matching all correct.

These were installed on 69 and 70 vettes as well so that ups the anti. I'm sure the numbers are different but the open face front end adds to the uniqueness.
stevengerard is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 10:09 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,127
Tucsonbob---check your pm's. Prices seem to be ALL OVER the place on these. As Stevengerard states, they can be pretty high but that's primarily from the Chevy demand.

Don't pay up much for the fact that one is rebuilt....that's not massive relative to the overall cost to have done as well as any detailing of the parts, etc.

Here's a 6 spoke open face alternator I recently did (When you read all this talk about "open face alternators" on here people are referring to the front case half and how the case is open all the way to the front edge between each spoke).

The second pic shows a "regular" Delco alternator....not an "open face" design.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_2591.JPG (48.2 KB, 130 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_2700.JPG (44.2 KB, 89 views)

Last edited by 70Post; February 2nd, 2011 at 10:12 PM.
70Post is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 10:33 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
wow, looks great Patton. And I agree you can get someone to rebuild it and make it a 63 amp, maybe even higher for around a 100 bucks, so if you can find one for the bottom range or even cheaper snag it. Like all these parts the minute you see one for 350, a month later one goes for 200 then you see one on evilpay go for 800.

Here's a pic of mine. Patton, any idea why mine has two grooves per fan blade and yours as three?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1100890 front openface.jpg (74.0 KB, 116 views)

Last edited by stevengerard; February 2nd, 2011 at 10:40 PM. Reason: added image
stevengerard is offline  
Old February 2nd, 2011, 11:09 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,127
No telling on that. I just checked a few fan blades I have here and I see both styles. Note--on the one I pic'd it's not 3 ridges on every "blade". Don't know if those ridges were put in to stiffen the blades or for something else. Maybe they decided they needed additional stiffening on the wider blades??

So many oddball variations on these parts. I would say that your fan blade is correct for a '70 as it matches one I have here...2 ridges per blade all the way around. I don't state that as being "determinitive" or exclusive...I'm instead confirming that yours matches a known original I have.

Although....upon closer inspection yours appears to have the super rare "prominent trailing edge tab" on the widest blade!!!

Last edited by 70Post; February 2nd, 2011 at 11:12 PM.
70Post is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 10:34 AM
  #15  
Lance
 
ROCKET VAPOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUKON, OK.
Posts: 738
Originally Posted by stevengerard
You know how that goes, I have heard of folks paying close to 2k for a rebuilt one for that final detail piece of the numbers matching resto, but really I have typically seen them from $400 - $1,200. Its a big range but typically the lower range is for ones with the wrong back or not stamped. The high end is for date matching all correct.

These were installed on 69 and 70 vettes as well so that ups the anti. I'm sure the numbers are different but the open face front end adds to the uniqueness.
Thanks Steven, it looks like I will have to take out a second loan on my house just to get one

I'll start keeping an eye out for one though
ROCKET VAPOR is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 01:32 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
yep, glad I kept that and the master brake cylinder, though I did let my original radiator go - so I have been keeping an eye out for that and the ever elusive 66-70 cruise control stalk - that's the fun of this game always something to look for, fix or tweak.
stevengerard is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 03:52 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
bobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 307
Hi Guys,

Rocket......when you go to buy one of these open faced alternators make sure you check the BACK of the alternator. I've seen a number of these on Ebay that have an incorrect back half casting. The correct one has raised heat sinks over the regulator, not just slot holes in the casting. For the price people are asking for these alternators you should get an entirely correct one, not just a correct open faced front.

later,
bob
bobb is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 04:42 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
here is what mine looks like for reference
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1100890 back openface.jpg (48.0 KB, 121 views)
stevengerard is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 05:10 PM
  #19  
Lance
 
ROCKET VAPOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YUKON, OK.
Posts: 738
Thanks for the info Steven and Bob.

I'll save these photos for furture referance.
ROCKET VAPOR is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 08:11 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,127
Another shot of the back....larger for more detail:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1792.JPG (73.5 KB, 100 views)
70Post is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 08:36 PM
  #21  
Moderator
 
2blu442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 13,681
I was recently talking with Steven about these alternators. Here's pictures of the one I've stashed away until I'm ready to use it. The mounting hole on the back is closer to the 6:00 O'clock position than the one you guys have. For those of you who know much more about this than me, any ideas why this would be in a different location? John

P1010107-1.jpg

P1010110-1.jpg

P1010108-2.jpg
2blu442 is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 09:01 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Tucsonbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 130
So, what do I have here?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Alternator 006.jpg (69.8 KB, 76 views)
File Type: jpg
Alternator 003.jpg (58.7 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg
Alternator 004.jpg (73.1 KB, 72 views)
File Type: jpg
Alternator 005.jpg (70.5 KB, 64 views)
Tucsonbob is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 09:26 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
bobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 307
Tucson,

I can't make out the 6th digit, but if it's a "9" as in "1100696" then it was stock on 66 Vettes with 327 and 427 engines rated at 350,390 and 425 hp when ordered with the K66 transistorized ignition. That's the good news. The less good news is it was also stock on Novas, Chevelles, and other Chevys that year.

Now.....you know how much we frown on people putting Vette parts on their 442s.....so please sell that alternator to some Vette nut for a ridiculous amount of $$$$ and get the right one for your car. Sheeeesh....the nerve of some people.

Have a great night,
bob
bobb is offline  
Old February 3rd, 2011, 10:42 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,127
Originally Posted by 2blu442
I was recently talking with Steven about these alternators. Here's pictures of the one I've stashed away until I'm ready to use it. The mounting hole on the back is closer to the 6:00 O'clock position than the one you guys have. For those of you who know much more about this than me, any ideas why this would be in a different location? John





Must be one of the '69 versions...they had the slight differences in the finned back half. August 26, 1969 date code but that could have landed on a '70 car I would guess....who knows for sure?? The alternator I posted the pic of the back of above is also 1100890 55A and has a date code of "9L5"....so it's a bit later build....November 5, 1969.

I'll volunteer since nobody seems to want to take on this heavy responsibility......Why don't all of you with these open face alternators, finned-back alternators, etc send them to me and I'll sort this whole mess out for everyone.

Last edited by 70Post; February 3rd, 2011 at 10:55 PM.
70Post is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
442mark
Parts For Sale
7
September 30th, 2017 01:06 PM
charlierogers
General Discussion
14
October 14th, 2011 09:44 AM
esisson
Parts Wanted
8
November 24th, 2009 03:10 AM
marzgtp1
Parts Wanted
1
August 31st, 2009 08:19 AM
marzgtp1
Parts Wanted
7
August 21st, 2009 01:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1970 455 Alternator



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.