Oil pressure operated switches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 21st, 2017, 01:46 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Oil pressure operated switches

I have learned that there are oil pressure operated switches, that are used for:
- To control electric choke and oil pressure warning light. Here one of the pins works like normal one post oil pressure light sensor (grounds the pin when oil pressure is on), and other two are normally open and closes when oil pressure is on (this pair controls choke).
- As a safety switch for electric fuel pump. Here you have one normally closed and one normally open contact, if I get it right.


Are those two really different switches or is it the same type of switch used to both purposes? If they are different components, are the P/N #:s available from someone?
slade69 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2017, 04:01 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,525
Here you go
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ke-wiring.html
oldcutlass is online now  
Old March 21st, 2017, 04:40 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by oldcutlass

Yes, I'm aware of that. There is explained how PS127 switch is used to control choke.


And here:
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...r-starter.html


The same Joe P. clearly explains how to use PS64 switch to control electric fuel pump. Thanks to him for sharing his great knowledge.


Only thing confusing for me is, are those mentioned PS127 and PS64 different to each other in function, or are they just old and new P/N?
slade69 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2017, 07:22 AM
  #4  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,267
Originally Posted by slade69
Only thing confusing for me is, are those mentioned PS127 and PS64 different to each other in function, or are they just old and new P/N?
They are different in function. PS127 has two separate SPST switches internally, one that connects the center terminal (for the OIL light) to ground when pressure is below 4 psi and a separate switch that connects the two outboard terminals to each other above 7 psi.

PS64 has a one SPDT switch internally. One terminal (the P terminal) that connects to the pump. This is connected to the center terminal when there is no oil pressure. The center terminal is connected to the S wire on the starter to power the pump during cranking (before there is oil pressure) to "prime" the carb. Once oil pressure exceeds about 7psi, the P terminal is switched to the other outside terminal, which is connected to a +12v source that is hot in the RUN position. This keeps the pump operating so long as there is oil pressure.

joe_padavano is online now  
Old March 21st, 2017, 01:21 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
They are different in function. PS127 has two separate SPST switches internally, one that connects the center terminal (for the OIL light) to ground when pressure is below 4 psi and a separate switch that connects the two outboard terminals to each other above 7 psi.

PS64 has a one SPDT switch internally. One terminal (the P terminal) that connects to the pump. This is connected to the center terminal when there is no oil pressure. The center terminal is connected to the S wire on the starter to power the pump during cranking (before there is oil pressure) to "prime" the carb. Once oil pressure exceeds about 7psi, the P terminal is switched to the other outside terminal, which is connected to a +12v source that is hot in the RUN position. This keeps the pump operating so long as there is oil pressure.

Many thanks, Joe! This must also mean that cars originally equipped with PS64 controlling the fuel pump, must have had separate sensor for oil light.
slade69 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2017, 04:12 PM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,267
Originally Posted by slade69
Many thanks, Joe! This must also mean that cars originally equipped with PS64 controlling the fuel pump, must have had separate sensor for oil light.
The original application for the PS64 was the fuel pump on the Vega. I know the 1972 Vega I owned (take it easy... I put a 215 in it ) had gauges, but it was a GT model.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old March 22nd, 2017, 06:54 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The original application for the PS64 was the fuel pump on the Vega. I know the 1972 Vega I owned (take it easy... I put a 215 in it ) had gauges, but it was a GT model.
Vega GT with Olds aluminium V8 sounds good to me even today! What trans did you use? I have seen couple of Vegas here in Finland equipped with Gen1 sbo.
Funny thing, 215 Olds/Buick alum. v8 engine is better known here in Europe as Rover engine. It has been a popular engine to swap in earlier years to many cars here, Volvo's, 240Z:s and so on. Light weight and small dimensions. Sorry, went a bit siderails/off-topic
slade69 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2017, 07:15 AM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,267
Originally Posted by slade69
Vega GT with Olds aluminium V8 sounds good to me even today! What trans did you use? I have seen couple of Vegas here in Finland equipped with Gen1 sbo.
Funny thing, 215 Olds/Buick alum. v8 engine is better known here in Europe as Rover engine. It has been a popular engine to swap in earlier years to many cars here, Volvo's, 240Z:s and so on. Light weight and small dimensions. Sorry, went a bit siderails/off-topic
This was back in the 1980s. I used the D&D kit with motor mounts and an adapter plate to the stock Vega TH250. The kit also included a custom oil pan and pickup. The fully dressed 215 weighed 20 lbs more than the Vega four cylinder motor (about 320 lbs total vs. 300 for the four banger).

While the BOPR aluminum motor is sort of the "small block Chevy" of the UK, GM actually built more of them in three years of production than Rover did in nearly four decades. Kind of gives you an idea of the differences in production scale between GM and Rover. And I do now have a 4.6 liter short block to go into my 62 F-85. Amazingly, Rover fixed many of the shortcomings of the original 215 design, including the block casting porosity and the addition of cross bolted main caps.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old March 23rd, 2017, 12:08 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
slade69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
This was back in the 1980s. I used the D&D kit with motor mounts and an adapter plate to the stock Vega TH250. The kit also included a custom oil pan and pickup. The fully dressed 215 weighed 20 lbs more than the Vega four cylinder motor (about 320 lbs total vs. 300 for the four banger).

While the BOPR aluminum motor is sort of the "small block Chevy" of the UK, GM actually built more of them in three years of production than Rover did in nearly four decades. Kind of gives you an idea of the differences in production scale between GM and Rover. And I do now have a 4.6 liter short block to go into my 62 F-85. Amazingly, Rover fixed many of the shortcomings of the original 215 design, including the block casting porosity and the addition of cross bolted main caps.
That sounds like an interesting Project. Does the U.K.4.6 still have the motor mounts similar to original 215? And how about the bellhousing bolt pattern? Are you planning to keep it fuel injected?
slade69 is offline  
Old March 23rd, 2017, 08:14 AM
  #10  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,267
Originally Posted by slade69
That sounds like an interesting Project. Does the U.K.4.6 still have the motor mounts similar to original 215? And how about the bellhousing bolt pattern? Are you planning to keep it fuel injected?
Yes, the Rover motors are pretty much bolt-in replacements. The biggest external difference is the front cover. The serpentine motors have a different water pump cavity for the reverse rotation. I believe it is also higher up. The DIS motors eliminated the distributor provision from the front cover, and with that the oil pump moved to a crank-driven gearrotor design. You can retrofit the early cover onto the later motors to retain a distributor and conventional oil pump (though you need to fit a distributor drive gear to the front of the cam).

I'm undecided on the EFI yet. I do have the complete GEMS style intake setup. Frankly, I'd rather find an old Hilborn injection system (that didn't cost a small fortune) and convert that to EFI. Might also go with a TBI system to retain the stock air cleaner for optical reasons.
joe_padavano is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tbirdman
442
14
March 7th, 2014 12:43 PM
foreverolds
Big Blocks
29
December 1st, 2012 07:07 PM
Railguy
Tech Editor's Desk
0
July 25th, 2010 02:36 PM
StickW31
Parts For Sale
0
February 23rd, 2010 08:15 AM



Quick Reply: Oil pressure operated switches



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 AM.