ClassicOldsmobile.com  

Go Back   ClassicOldsmobile.com > Vehicle Lineup > Eighty-Eight
Forums Gallery Encyclopedia Tech Olds Junction Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2007, 03:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
tiparosa
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22
Need A New Radiator

Any suggestions where to purchase a new radiator for a 62 Dynamic? I called a couple of local rad shops and they said I need to recore my original but I think I should by new as I dont know much about recore and would not know the diff between repair and recore. The radiator is leaking and looks like its in bad shape.

thanks,
T
tiparosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!
Old 02-04-2007, 07:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
mitsudave
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 54
If the tanks are still good, a good radiator shop can recore it and it will be good as new. A new radiator for your car may not be available, and recoring is a good alternative to new, and usually cheaper.
__________________
Dave Paulison
Palm Bay, Florida
1969 Olds Cutlass Supreme
mitsudave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 01:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
texasred
Super Moderator
 
texasred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsudave View Post
If the tanks are still good, a good radiator shop can recore it and it will be good as new. A new radiator for your car may not be available, and recoring is a good alternative to new, and usually cheaper.
And most of the over-the-counter replacements have fewer rows and smaller tubes.

IMO, Recore!

C.J.
__________________
Home of the 1971 Cutlass Supreme convertible Super Karate Monkey Death Car.

texasred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007, 07:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
tiparosa
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22
Smile RECORE the Radiator

Had the radiator recored and installed it tonight. Cost $350 to recore and the guy added a 4th row/core. Runs without leak. http://www.classicoldsmobile.com/for...cons/icon7.gif
Smile
tiparosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007, 09:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
texasred
Super Moderator
 
texasred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 807
Kewl!
__________________
Home of the 1971 Cutlass Supreme convertible Super Karate Monkey Death Car.

texasred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 12:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Oldsguy
Administrator
 
Oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lees Summit MO
Posts: 3,167
Now here's a twist on this subject to chew on. I read a thread over at ROP a while back and the jist of the argument was how to best cool a big block. One guy was an engineer of some sort and claimed involvement in radiator design and claimed that a radiator/cooling system can move the coolant TOO QUICKLY, he said that the coolant would not have enough time to release it's heat energy to the air as it passes through the radiator. I never knew what to think about that. So, his statemtent was a 4 row radiator might not be better than a 3 row, or a 2 row. He said another thing to consider besides the number of rows, assuming you really DO need to exchange more heat (I guess negating or ignoring his first argument) would be the shape and size of the flat radiating fins sticking out from the cores. Go figure. I never could decide......
__________________
Dan
'77 Cutlass Supreme
'46 2 door
Oldsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 06:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
2blu442
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 935
Radiators

I won't claim to be an expert, but I've got a 1970 442 with a 455 and the 3 core radiator wasn't enough on hot summer days. When I moved to this part of the state I found a lot of summer days in the 90's with a week or two over 100. If I was driving through the city stopping at traffic lights it would overheat. That was with good looking tubes inside the radiator and a 160 degree thermostat. I put in a 4 core and that did the trick, no more overheating. That was my experience. John
__________________
1964 Cutlass Factory 4spd
1965 442 4spd
1967 442 Auto
1967 Cutlass Convertible
1968 442 Auto
1969 442 W30 Auto
1970 442 4spd
1971 Cutlass Flat Top Wagon
1973 Che*vy 3/4 Ton 454/TH400 Tow Vehicle
Only the tow vehicle is finished!
2blu442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2007, 12:13 AM   #8 (permalink)
texasred
Super Moderator
 
texasred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 807
Dan,

I remember that argument...errr...discussion. I'm pretty sure the whole thing centered around running without a thermostat which removes the restiction in the cooling system.

If they didn't need a 4 core radiator for HD cooling, do you think Olds would have wasted the money on it?

JMHO and JMQM (Just my questionable memory).

C.J.
__________________
Home of the 1971 Cutlass Supreme convertible Super Karate Monkey Death Car.

texasred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2007, 06:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
mitsudave
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 54
This one rears its ugly head every once in a while...I believe C.J. is correct about the running without a thermostat being a qualification for the argument. If you have no means of flow control, it may be true (but still sounds far-fetched to me). If you have a functioning thermostat or at least one of those flow restrictors in there, the coolant would have sufficient time to release its heat energy to the air.
__________________
Dave Paulison
Palm Bay, Florida
1969 Olds Cutlass Supreme
mitsudave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
All content Copyright © 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34