Factory 455 's
#1
Factory 455 's
So..if a person wanted to replicate a W30 engine like the factory produced (i.e. -360hp,370hp,) ,and with todays technology ,knowledge and quality of parts;pistons ,camshafts et al ,can these HP numbers be matched and improved with just a stock type but quality rebuild ?AND using iron heads but an aluminum intake ,HEI and Q-Jet. Is a target of a streetable 400-450 hp possible ?
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
So..if a person wanted to replicate a W30 engine like the factory produced (i.e. -360hp,370hp,) ,and with todays technology ,knowledge and quality of parts;pistons ,camshafts et al ,can these HP numbers be matched and improved with just a stock type but quality rebuild ?AND using iron heads but an aluminum intake ,HEI and Q-Jet. Is a target of a streetable 400-450 hp possible ?
#4
I definitely think you could exceed factory power numbers using the parts you mentioned and a quality build. I've got a pretty solid motor right now, but eventually I'll be trying to do the same thing you're talking about, 455, Performer, Quadrajet, HEI, iron heads, an honest 400+ horsepower. The main difference for me, which you didn't mention one way or the other, is I always use headers. They only help, IMO. I'd be shooting for just under 10:1 CR, and would have the heads done by someone who knows Olds. I haven't needed the service, so I haven't looked into it yet and don't know who's good. It will be interesting to see your results, Vortecpro.
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado/Thousand Oaks Ca
Posts: 1,719
#9
I definitely think you could exceed factory power numbers using the parts you mentioned and a quality build. I've got a pretty solid motor right now, but eventually I'll be trying to do the same thing you're talking about, 455, Performer, Quadrajet, HEI, iron heads, an honest 400+ horsepower. The main difference for me, which you didn't mention one way or the other, is I always use headers. They only help, IMO. I'd be shooting for just under 10:1 CR, and would have the heads done by someone who knows Olds. I haven't needed the service, so I haven't looked into it yet and don't know who's good. It will be interesting to see your results, Vortecpro.
#11
The number one reason why today's engines produce more HP per cubic inch as compared to the 1960s is cylinder head design. Number two is computer controlled EFI that very accurately meters fuel. Unless you come up with a brand new head design that mimics an LS-family head and convert to port EFI, you will not get the same combination of power, driveability, and mileage as new motors get.
#12
Yes I can see why the growing trend of LS motors are gaining in popularity however I also think that an Oldsmobile vehicle should have an Oldsmobile motor.Popping the hood on an 70's muscle car and seeing a modern motor is a let down for me always, BUT i think that that the newer models of easy EFI may be a good alternative for us guys that like our Olds
motors.I think it would be more of a challenge to get your 70's car toward the 20+ mpg level than to just drop in an LS motor ,BUT thats IMO . I can also drop in an overdrive transmission ,use Synthetic oils and fluids to increase our mileage .BUT if your really worried about saving gas drive your 4 banger
motors.I think it would be more of a challenge to get your 70's car toward the 20+ mpg level than to just drop in an LS motor ,BUT thats IMO . I can also drop in an overdrive transmission ,use Synthetic oils and fluids to increase our mileage .BUT if your really worried about saving gas drive your 4 banger
#13
Easy EFI is still a throttle body system. You don't get the benefits of properly designed sequential port injection. And while the items you've listed will help, the reality is that the cylinder head improvements far outweigh any of the other changes. I'm waiting for someone to replicate the LS head design for an Olds motor. THAT will make a difference.
#14
For the sake of curiosity, what are the differences between 60s and LS heads? If you don't mind. Over head cam?
Port EFI should be doable, that's a matter of drilling the intake for port injection, yes?
Port EFI should be doable, that's a matter of drilling the intake for port injection, yes?
#15
LS motors are the current generation of Chebby motors (you don't need to say SBC anymore, because BBC production stopped about two years ago). They are still pushrod motors. The heads have very carefully designed ports and chambers that optimize valve position and shape to promote flow and atomization. Please be aware that the engine design is a complete system. All parts need to be matched - cylinder head design, manifold runner length and shape, injector position in the port, cam profile, ignition timing, etc. You can get small gains by implementing parts of the design, but you won't come close to the total output without using a systems approach. This is a flaw in most engine builds - people throw parts together without ensuring that they are matched as a system.
#16
Ah, I see. Guess that's where the "40 years of development" become more than just a matter of the price of bolt-on parts. :P
So I'd get more out of my HEI if I got port EFI and higher compression to mimic a newer engine? Makes sense. The engine will only perform as well as its most shoddy part allows it to.
Mark/cutlassefi has a port efi'd smallblock, as far as I know. So it's doable.
So I'd get more out of my HEI if I got port EFI and higher compression to mimic a newer engine? Makes sense. The engine will only perform as well as its most shoddy part allows it to.
Mark/cutlassefi has a port efi'd smallblock, as far as I know. So it's doable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
76cutlass455
Cars For Sale
12
March 9th, 2012 03:27 PM
81 regency
Parts For Sale
3
March 1st, 2012 11:23 PM