Interesting how the term “Stroker” has evolved from a Guys name, into an Internet buzzword.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
........ the 400 crank will drop into a 350 block .........
|
Not a “drop in”. .200” must be removed from the Mains.
Quote:
|
........ There's nothing magic about this displacement ........
|
The “magic” is in the perception. “383 stroker” Doesn't it just sound impressive?
So impressive, that its shortcomings go unnoticed.
Quote:
|
........ These are completely different than the Chevy motors, so Chevy ways of building things don't apply .........
|
The same laws of physics apply to both.
Quote:
|
........ the BBO uses larger bearings than the SBO ........
|
Just as the 400 uses larger bearings than the 350.
Quote:
|
........ theoretically you could have a BBO crank turned down to fit an SBO block ........
|
It's been done, more than once. Solves the “bearing speed” problem, but creates another, with the “poor” rod/stroke ratio. Same problem that was designed into the 400 (so, to the 383) Chev.
Quote:
|
........ easy alternative is to use an Olds diesel block, which already had BBO-sized bearings ........
|
Same main journals, same bearing speed. Same “rod angle problem.
Quote:
|
........ you get into things like custom rods and pistons ........
|
As I said before,
http://classicoldsmobile.com/forums/...html#post16730
it can easily be done with off the self parts.
Quote:
|
........ The better question is, why bother? ........
|
To be different? I don't see a “383” as being different, but the number certainly draws a lot more attention than my 437.
Quote:
|
........ however, swapping a 330 crank into a later 350 or 403 gives you a forged crank ........
|
The term “forged crank” can also impress an audience.
Quote:
|
........ 403 or the 455 (or 425 or 400) swap ........
|
Cheap and easy, with good results.
Norm