right way to raise the back a little

Old April 25th, 2011, 10:23 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dschallock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 47
right way to raise the back a little

Is there a correct way to raise the rear a little? Are coil spring spacers an incorrect way? Should whole new springs be purchased that are longer?
-Dan
dschallock is offline  
Old April 25th, 2011, 10:46 AM
  #2  
Ben
 
RAMBOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,823
stock springs, Good Gas Shocks, and AirLift 1000 bag inserts inside the rear springs.

valve the bags separately, run about 10psi in each back and it will lift your rear about 1/2" which is perfect if you ask me.

They provide great adjustability for hauling a load or extra people w/o stressing your shock mounts the way air shocks do.

I've put them in every GM a-body i've ever owned.
RAMBOW is offline  
Old April 25th, 2011, 11:22 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Rickman48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Shorewood, Il.
Posts: 3,057
I've found the 'overload' springs you can buy seperatly from Auto Zone work pretty well.
$25 - they bolt over your shocks, and are adjustable by compression.
Currently on my S-10 Blazer for the last 40k, oblivious of load!
Rickman48 is offline  
Old April 25th, 2011, 12:49 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
defiant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,003
Originally Posted by dschallock
Is there a correct way to raise the rear a little? Are coil spring spacers an incorrect way? Should whole new springs be purchased that are longer?
-Dan

My original coil springs have 2 spacers on each spring. I am getting new springs, so I will compare the difference in height between the two. I notice rockauto sells the coil spacers as well.

d1
defiant1 is offline  
Old April 25th, 2011, 12:55 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,519
The aluminum and rubber spacers that go above the sping work well. I used station wagon springs gas shocks on the back of mine.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 07:05 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
dave84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern, NJ
Posts: 71
This is the next area I am looking at after brakes, so my question is what would be the best solution to all who have raked out the back end: station wagon springs (maybe even cut down), the air bag solution Rambow gave, spacers. Who has tried what? I've heard from many sources for GM A bodies to use station wagon springs. All I want is about 2" higher in the back, this cutlass needs a new stance. Also down the road I'll be throwing on wider wheels and tires, give it a real mean hot rod look.
dave84 is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 10:25 AM
  #7  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,258
Originally Posted by dschallock
Is there a correct way to raise the rear a little?
Cut 1/2 to 1 coil from the FRONT springs.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 10:33 AM
  #8  
delete
 
droptopron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,807
Spacers aren't great because they put added stress on that isolated area of the spring. Keep in mind that the shocks & springs do different job. Shocks control the ride & springs hold the car up. Any solution thru the shock is asking it do to something it wasn't originally intended to.
droptopron is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 12:34 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
dave84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern, NJ
Posts: 71
So changing the springs only would raise it, keep it rigid still and allow the shocks to work the way they were meant to work? I'm only looking for about 2" up on the back.
dave84 is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 01:49 PM
  #10  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,519
Mostly any mod to springs will likely lead to a shock change. I used station wagon springs and longer shocks.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 03:07 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
You can use longer springs, or you can use stiffer springs. Or you can use the original springs but put a spacer above or below them. Each of these will affect the ride in a different way.

Note that, no matter which of the above methods you use, you will also be changing the geometry of the control arms and the pinion angle. This isn't quite as disasterous for the rear as it is when you raise or lower the front and thus change the front-end geometry, but it will still affect handling and traction. The RIGHT way to raise the rear would involve changing the location of the control arm pivot points. Which brings us to the best way to control ride height: install a 4-link set-up with coil-over shocks.

2" is not a small amount.....
BlackGold is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 05:29 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
roscoep41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barrington,Nova Scotia
Posts: 21
I put 1 inch spacers on top of my springs and raised the rear 3/4 of an inch.
roscoep41 is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 05:35 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
71KUTLASS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: OHIO
Posts: 49
i went with a heavy duty cargo spring. I think they were intended for a station wagon. Anyway did the trick for me and only cost me about 80 bucks
71KUTLASS is offline  
Old May 5th, 2011, 10:21 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Big Blue 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Cut 1/2 to 1 coil from the FRONT springs.
LoL, that is just dropping the front
Big Blue 72 is offline  
Old May 6th, 2011, 06:13 AM
  #15  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,258
Originally Posted by Big Blue 72
LoL, that is just dropping the front
My point exactly. You get the rake that looks good without raising the CG of the car. This way you don't screw up the handling. If you are raising the back just to get wheels and tires to fit, then buy the correct tire size and wheel offset. There is no reason to raise the back.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 6th, 2011, 09:05 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Big Blue 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
My point exactly. You get the rake that looks good without raising the CG of the car. This way you don't screw up the handling. If you are raising the back just to get wheels and tires to fit, then buy the correct tire size and wheel offset. There is no reason to raise the back.
This is true but won't cutting coils mess up the ride quality due to the change in spring rate?
Big Blue 72 is offline  
Old May 6th, 2011, 10:19 AM
  #17  
Ben
 
RAMBOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,823
Originally Posted by Big Blue 72
This is true but won't cutting coils mess up the ride quality due to the change in spring rate?
cutting the coils actually increases the spring rate(which is a good thing for handling purposes). So as long as you don't cut too much off causing it to bottom out all the time, it won't negatively affect handling, actually it would benifit it.
RAMBOW is offline  
Old May 6th, 2011, 04:21 PM
  #18  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,258
Originally Posted by RAMBOW
cutting the coils actually increases the spring rate(which is a good thing for handling purposes). So as long as you don't cut too much off causing it to bottom out all the time, it won't negatively affect handling, actually it would benifit it.
Although, in fairness, "ride quality" is not necessarily the same thing as handling. If a soft ride is desired, cutting the coils will negatively affect the ride quality.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 6th, 2011, 08:57 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Big Blue 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Although, in fairness, "ride quality" is not necessarily the same thing as handling. If a soft ride is desired, cutting the coils will negatively affect the ride quality.
I guess everything is relative , I have seen rides with tons of coils cut and they just bounce all over. Is that pretty common with an increased spring rate?
Big Blue 72 is offline  
Old January 16th, 2014, 12:50 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
e129745's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 41
Originally Posted by Big Blue 72
I guess everything is relative , I have seen rides with tons of coils cut and they just bounce all over. Is that pretty common with an increased spring rate?
The shocks dampen the release of the stored energy. They are to control the rate or velocity the release occurs. Spring rate changes require shock rate changes to keep/get spring oscillation under control and predictable.
(I know, "old thread", just bored)
e129745 is offline  
Old January 16th, 2014, 12:55 PM
  #21  
Hookers under Hood
 
76olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,543
76 station wagon coils and Monroe air shocks in the rear here, run 80 lbs of air, A little high in the rear but I like it.
76olds is offline  
Old January 16th, 2014, 07:36 PM
  #22  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
cargo coils also do the trick pretty cheaply.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old July 28th, 2016, 10:20 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
distributorguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Minneapolis metro
Posts: 255
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
My point exactly. You get the rake that looks good without raising the CG of the car. This way you don't screw up the handling. If you are raising the back just to get wheels and tires to fit, then buy the correct tire size and wheel offset. There is no reason to raise the back.
Reset tow-in angle with a tape measure after lowering, as its all you'll need. I prefer about 1/8" toe-in, which zero's out at speed. An older front-end rebuild you might want to go up to 1/4" toe in.
distributorguy is offline  
Old July 28th, 2016, 10:23 AM
  #24  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,258
Originally Posted by distributorguy
Reset tow-in angle with a tape measure after lowering, as its all you'll need. I prefer about 1/8" toe-in, which zero's out at speed. An older front-end rebuild you might want to go up to 1/4" toe in.
Dredging up a pretty old thread here, but since you brought it up...

Sorry, but there's more to it than that. Changing the rake of the car changes caster angle for the worse.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 29th, 2016, 06:41 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,842
Originally Posted by distributorguy
Reset tow-in angle with a tape measure after lowering, as its all you'll need. I prefer about 1/8" toe-in, which zero's out at speed. An older front-end rebuild you might want to go up to 1/4" toe in.
Camber also changes when the front ride height changes.
oddball is offline  
Old July 29th, 2016, 06:44 AM
  #26  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,258
Originally Posted by oddball
Camber also changes when the front ride height changes.
Yes, but not nearly as much as caster. The bottom line is that whenever you do a wheel alignment, you are supposed to account for rake angle of the vehicle, as this affects the kingpin angle (the line between the ball joints) and thus all alignment adjustments.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old July 29th, 2016, 07:59 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
distributorguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Minneapolis metro
Posts: 255
Personally, I like the handling of a car with low caster. I prefer it. As long as the car still turns out of corners on its own (without having to push the wheel back to center) its all good.
distributorguy is offline  
Old September 15th, 2016, 11:17 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
R&RTrading's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4
I just had this issue. Needed to raise the rear up to clear bigger tires. Air shocks raised it tbit it was too much for it (and more than likely they leaked because they suck) and it would sink back down. Instead of getting sedan or wagon springs, I went to the junkyard and pulled rear coils from a 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. They fit perfect and give the perfect height to clear the wheels. Not too stiff and ride nice. Might be worth a try as it was a $20 fix.
R&RTrading is offline  
Old September 15th, 2016, 01:32 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
RandyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
Originally Posted by R&RTrading
I just had this issue. Needed to raise the rear up to clear bigger tires. Air shocks raised it tbit it was too much for it (and more than likely they leaked because they suck) and it would sink back down. Instead of getting sedan or wagon springs, I went to the junkyard and pulled rear coils from a 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee. They fit perfect and give the perfect height to clear the wheels. Not too stiff and ride nice. Might be worth a try as it was a $20 fix.
What car were these put in?
RandyS is offline  
Old September 15th, 2016, 01:39 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
R&RTrading's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by RandyS
What car were these put in?
1969 Olds Cutlass. Should be similar to others.
R&RTrading is offline  
Old September 15th, 2016, 04:42 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
RandyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
Originally Posted by R&RTrading
1969 Olds Cutlass. Should be similar to others.
Unfortunately, not a 66....... Had my hopes up for a minute.
RandyS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RandyS
Suspension & Handling
16
February 15th, 2015 10:33 AM
zak0331
The Newbie Forum
8
May 5th, 2014 05:29 PM
Leadfoot
The Newbie Forum
5
February 5th, 2014 03:58 PM
Ddbord
Eighty-Eight
46
April 22nd, 2010 07:48 PM
Bobsw32
Small Blocks
2
April 5th, 2009 11:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: right way to raise the back a little



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM.